2 Procedure

2.1 Procedure

Titel: Contract for Purchase of the Platform for Streaming and Related Services

Beskrivelse: DR’s vision is to purchase a platform for streaming and related services. The Platform\n should support and enhance the existing DRTV applications for streaming but also upholds\n the unwavering DR’s public service commitment. DR aims to significantly bolster our\n competitive stance in the rapidly expanding landscape of TV and streaming services.\n DR seeks a Platform that not only fosters exceptional user experiences, but also offers\n a well proven and solid framework for personalization and content management. DR’s\n platform of choice must facilitate effortless configuration of design, navigation,\n and content based on audience behaviour as well as empowering DR’s editorial teams\n to tailor an exceptional DRTV-experience, to all types of End-Users, from children,\n youngsters, teens, adults to seniors. DR’s success metrics revolve around effectively\n attracting and retaining the users. To achieve this, the Platform must support best\n of breed in user engagement and focus on minimizing churn. It is DR’s vision to achieve\n greater flexibility, market adaptability, get enhanced decision-making capabilities,\n and heightened competitiveness. DR aims to strike for the perfect and harmonious balance\n between standardization and bespoke development. The goal is to have a Platform that\n provides a framework to create a personalized streaming product making the time worth\n spend on DRTV. This should be supported by the integration to external recommendation\n engines as well as orchestrating and manually curation of content. DR aims to utilize\n the Platform to empower the editorial teams, with tools to customize a tailored digital\n experience. DR wants a flexible Platform which makes it easy to configure design,\n navigation, layout and ingest content behaviour to increase engagement and decrease\n churn, within the Platform. The Platform needs to integrate easily via well-documented\n APIs with other systems as it will be part of our existing tech- and eco-environment\n stack. The Platform serves as a central hub for planning, ingesting, managing, and\n showcasing/distributing videos and content to the End-user. Thus, the Platform serves\n as a control center for the Platform-workflow, and it is DR's ambition to create a\n well-founded Platform to ensure better integration, flexibility, and adaptability\n of DR’s apps.The main services (A-C) under the Contract are:A. Delivery of a Platform:\n A complete delivery of the Platform (as described above), including the necessary\n functionality, API and integrations B. Implementation of the Platform; a complete\n implementation of the Platform with the underlying implementation activities, including\n complying with the time schedule, establishment of the cooperation and test of the\n Platform C. Continuing services: Delivery of Operation, Maintenance and Support of\n the Platform while complying with service levels and processes. Furthermore, the Supplier\n shall – if ordered by DR – deliver Ordered Services under the Contract, including\n Adaptions and Consultancy Services.

Identifikator for proceduren: 5c9894cc-e885-4777-8e6a-8767bbdeaed8

Tidligere bekendtgørelse: 3bcd2e03-434e-4b4d-a716-c49f3ec8a725-01

Intern identifikator: 4811

Udbudsprocedure: Udbud med forhandling/indkaldelse af tilbud med forudgående offentliggørelse

Proceduren er en hasteprocedure: nej

Hovedpunkterne i proceduren: Description of the procedure (Danish)The shortlisting of candidates invited to tender\n will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented the most relevant\n supplies, in relation to the main services put up for tender, see the description\n in description of procurement. The relevance assessment will be made on the basis\n of the extent to which the references, combined, document experience in the provision\n of services that are comparable to the main services put up for tender. In the evaluation\n of which candidates have documented the most relevant supplies, the contracting entity\n will award points to the candidates on a scale from 1-5 for each main service, based\n on the extent to which the references, combined, document relevant experience in providing\n the main services. On this basis, the candidate will be awarded a total score calculated\n as the average number of points awarded for the main services.

2.1.1 Formål

Kontraktens art: Tjenesteydelser

Primær klassificering (cpv): 72000000 It-tjenester: rådgivning, programmeludvikling, internet og support

Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 72210000 Programmeringsservice i forbindelse med programmelpakker

Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 72220000 Konsulentvirksomhed i forbindelse med systemer og teknik

Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 72310000 Databehandling

Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 72320000 Databasevirksomhed

2.1.2 Udførelsessted

Hvor som helst inden for EØS

2.1.3 Værdi

Anslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 48.000.000 Dansk krone

2.1.4 Generelle oplysninger

Indkaldelse af tilbud er afsluttet

Yderligere oplysninger: An information meeting will be held at May the 7th 2024 at the address Emil Holms\n Kanal 20. For practical reasons, operators interested in participating in the meeting\n are asked to sign up via the electronic tendering system not later than 3 days before\n the meeting with indication of name of business and number of participants. The contracting\n entity may reduce the number of par-ticipants per business. The contracting entity\n will draw up brief minutes of the information meeting which will be announced to all\n tenderers participating in the tender procedure via the electronic tendering system.\n DR has assessed that the Platform and Related Services is connected services that\n aren’t suitable for division. The Platform is a single backend solution, and the Related\n Services is directly related to ensuring the operation and performance of the Platform.\n The contract is not divided into lots due to the objective of having a clear and unambiguous\n contractual relationship, where the overall responsibility for the Platform and the\n Services is placed with one supplier in order to ensure the highest possible quality,\n including efficient management, at the lowest possible price. Given that the Platform\n in ques-tion is relatively complex, DR believes that this objective would not be met\n by offering the services into lots. Instead, it is necessary to tender out the delivery\n and implementation of the Platform and the associated operation, maintenance, etc.,\n to the same supplier. This approach, in the contracting authority’s assessment, ensures\n the most effective implementation and overall operation of the Platform. The contract\n has incorporated the corporate social responsibility considerations, as appropriate,\n as laid down in the conventions on the basis of which the principles of the UN Global\n Compact are worded and as laid down in the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.\n The contract furthermore lays down requirements pursuant to ILO Convention no. 94\n on labour clauses in public contracts and Circular no. 9471 of 30 June 2014. The contract\n lays down requirements on compliance with the law on processing of personal data.\n If the contract is awarded to a group of operators (such as a consortium), the participants\n of the group must undertake joint and several liability and appoint a joint representative.\n Participation in the tender procedure may only take place by electronic means via\n the electronic tendering system used by the contracting entity. For access to the\n tender documents, the tenderer must be registered or register as a user. If the tender\n contains several versions of the same document, the latest uploaded version will apply.\n All communication in connection with the tender procedure, including questions and\n answers, must take place through the electronic tendering system. Questions must be\n submitted not later than the 22nd of May 2024. Questions asked after this date will\n be answered if they are received in time for the contracting entity to provide the\n information required and communicate the answers not later than six days before expiry\n of the application dead-line. Questions received later than six days before expiry\n of the deadline cannot expect to be answered unless the deadline is also postponed.\n Before the award decision is made, the tenderer to whom the contracting entity intends\n to award the contract must provide documentation of the information submitted in the\n ESPD pursuant to sections 151-152, cf. section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act. As an alternative to the documentation mentioned in sections 153-155, 157 and\n 158 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, the applicant and tenderer may submit to\n the contract-ing entity a certificate of registration in an official list of approved\n economic operators, see section 156 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, issued by\n the competent authority. The contracting entity only accepts certifi-cates of registration\n in an official list from applicants and tenderers established in the country holding\n the official list. The candidate must as its application submit an ESPD as preliminary\n documentation of the circumstances set out in section 148(1), paras 1-3 of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act (udbudsloven), and section 137(1) para 2 of the Danish Public\n Procurement Act. It is not necessary for the tenderer to sign the ESPD document. For\n groups of operators (e.g., a consortium), a separate ESPD must be submitted for each\n participating operator. Where the tenderer is a group of operators, the ESPD document\n of each participant in the group must be signed by the participant in question. The\n tenderer heading the group and submitting the tender is not re-quired to sign its\n ESPD document. If the tenderer relies on the capacities of other entities, an ESPD\n must be submitted for and signed by each of the entities on which the tenderer relies.\n In this procedure, the candidate may rely on the technical and/or financial capacity\n of other operators to fulfil the suitability requirements, including for the purpose\n of selection. The operator(s) making its/their technical and/or financial capacity\n available to the candidate must sign a letter of commitment, see further in the tender\n specifi-cations. The form is enclosed as an attachment to the tender specifications.\n The candidate must also submit a letter of commitment in which the entity/entities\n on which the candidate relies has/have undertaken joint and several liability with\n the candidate if the candidate is awarded the contract. The form is enclosed as an\n attachment to the tender specifications. The candidate will be excluded from participation\n in the tender procedure if the candidate is subject to the compulsory grounds for\n exclusion set out in sections 134 a, 135 and 136 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, and the exclusion grounds stated in the Danish Public Procurement Act, section\n 137(1), para 2, unless the candidate has submitted sufficient documentation of its\n reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. The\n voluntary grounds for exclusion are applied while complying with the principle of\n proportionality. Hence, trivial matters cannot result in the exclusion of the candidate.\n Several matters which, individually, are less seri-ous in nature may, however, give\n rise to exclusion of the candidate. -o0o- It should be noted that the estimated contract\n value stated in this notice is an estimate of the expected contract price for the\n entire term of the contract. The estimate is based on the knowledge obtained during\n the market analysis and a following calculation of the needed services, including\n the knowledge from the existing contact. The contracting entity may use the procedure\n of section 159(5) of the Danish Public Procurement Act in the event that applications\n or tenders do not comply with the formal requirements of the procurement documents.The\n contracting entity expects the negotiations to be concerning, the Contract, the Platform,\n The Services cost-drivers and cooperation, it is expected that there will be one negotiation\n meeting per tenderer and one negotiation round. For further information on the process\n of the negotiations, reference is made to the tender specifica-tions and the related\n Annexes B and C. The duration of the contract is 84 months from the Acceptance Date,\n cf. the Contract. In addition to the indicated duration of contract, an expiry phase\n that is flexible in time will be required when the contract is at an end in order\n to ensure an undisturbed continuation of the Platform in connection with a possible\n re-tender. -o0o- Due to an error in the contract notice DR chooses to cancel the procurement\n procedure, DR intents publish a new procedure within days.

Retsgrundlag:

Direktiv 2014/24/EU

5 Delkontrakt

5.1 Teknisk ID for partiet: LOT-0000

Titel: Contract for Purchase of the Platform for Streaming and Related Services

Intern identifikator: 4811

5.1.1 Formål

Kontraktens art: Tjenesteydelser

Primær klassificering (cpv): 72000000 It-tjenester: rådgivning, programmeludvikling, internet og support

Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 72210000 Programmeringsservice i forbindelse med programmelpakker

Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 72220000 Konsulentvirksomhed i forbindelse med systemer og teknik

Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 72310000 Databehandling

Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 72320000 Databasevirksomhed

5.1.2 Udførelsessted

Hvor som helst inden for EØS

Yderligere oplysninger:

5.1.3 Anslået varighed

Varighed: 84 Måned

5.1.5 Værdi

Anslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 48.000.000 Dansk krone

5.1.6 Generelle oplysninger

Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler

Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja

5.1.10 Tildelingskriterier

Kriterium:

Type: Kvalitet

Navn: Platform

Beskrivelse: Is evaluated on the basis of an overall assessment of the offered Platform. When conducting\n the assessment, DR will put emphasis on: • To which extent the offered Platform and\n the architecture of the Platform is stable, scalable and flexible, see Appendix 3,\n evaluation requirement ER-4 • To which extent the offered API in the Platform is effective\n and supports seamlessly integra-tion with other services and applications, see Appendix\n 3, evaluation requirement no. ER-16 • To which extent the offered Platform supports\n an effective, dynamic and intuitive content management, see Appendix 3, evaluation\n requirement no. ER-76, ER-79, ER-80 and ER-81 • To which extent the Platform supports\n a secure and efficient and personalized content delivery to End-User applications,\n see Appendix 3, evaluation requirement no. ER-77, ER-78 and ER-82

Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 40

Kriterium:

Type: Kvalitet

Navn: Time schedule, test and operation

Beskrivelse: Is evaluated on the basis of an overall assessment of the offered time schedule, test\n and Operation. When conducting the assessment, DR will put emphasis on: • To which\n extent the offered time schedule is realistic and robust, see Appendix 1, evalua-tion\n requirement no. ER-13 and ER-14. • To which extent the offered test setup and test\n plans ensure that the Platform is tested ef-fectively and ensures a robust delivery\n of the Platform, see Appendix 6, evaluation re-quirement no. ER-16. • To which extent\n the offered methods and processes for Operation are efficient and ensures a secure\n and stable Operation of the Platform, see Appendix 7, evaluation requirements no.\n ER-14.

Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 15

Kriterium:

Type: Kvalitet

Navn: Support and cooperation

Beskrivelse: Is evaluated on the basis of an overall assessment of the offered support and cooperation\n . When con-ducting the assessment, DR will put emphasis on: • To which extent the\n Supplier’ ensures that DR can access information easily, see Appendix 9, evaluation\n requirement no. ER-3. • To which extent the offered cooperation organisation is efficient\n and consistent in the delivery of the Services, see Appendix 11, evaluation requirements,\n no. ER-1. • To which extent the offered collaboration with DR and DR’s other suppliers\n is effective, see Ap-pendix 11, evaluation requirements no ER-2.

Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 15

Kriterium:

Type: Pris

Navn: Price

Beskrivelse: Is evaluated on the basis of the total technical evaluation price, see Appendix 12\n – Prices, payment schedule and other prices.

Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 30

5.1.12 Udbudsvilkår

Oplysninger om undersøgelsesfrister: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, etc. (lov\n om Klagenævnet for Udbud m.v.) (the Act is available (in Danish) at www.retsinformation.dk),\n the following deadlines apply to the lodging of complaints: Complaints for not having\n been selected must be submitted to the Danish Complaints Board for Public Pro-curement\n before the expiry of 20 calendar days, see section 7(1) of the Act, from the day after\n submission of notification to the candidates concerned of the identity of the successful\n tenderer where the notification is ac-companied by an explanation of the grounds for\n the decision in accordance with section 2(1), para (1) of the Act and section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act. In other situations, complaints of award procedures,\n see section 7(2) of the Act, must be lodged with the Danish Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement before the expiry of: 1) 45 calendar days after the contracting entity\n has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union that the contracting\n entity has entered into a contract. The deadline is calculated from the day after\n the day when the notice was published. 2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day\n after the day when the contracting entity has notified the candidates concerned that\n a contract based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic\n pur-chasing system has been entered into where the notification has included an explanation\n of the relevant grounds for the decision. 3) 6 months after the contracting entity\n entered into a framework agreement calculated from the day after the day when the\n contracting entity notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, see section 2(2)\n of the Act and section 171(4) of the Danish Public Procurement Act. 4) 20 calendar\n days calculated from the day after the contracting entity has submitted notification\n of its deci-sion, see section 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.Not later\n than at the time of lodging a complaint with the Danish Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement, the complainant must notify the contracting entity in writing that a\n complaint has been lodged with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n and whether the appeal was lodged during the standstill period, see section 6(4) of\n the Act. In cases where the complaint was not lodged within the standstill period,\n the complainant must furthermore indicate whether a suspensory effect of the complaint\n has been requested, see section 12(1) of the Act.The e-mail address of the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement is set out in this notice. The Complaints Board’s own\n complaints procedure is available at https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/vejledning/

5.1.15 Teknikker

Rammeaftale:

Ingen rammeaftale

Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:

Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem

5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgang

Organisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for udbud

Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA

2 Procedure

2.1 Procedure

Title: Contract for Purchase of the Platform for Streaming and Related Services

Description: DR’s vision is to purchase a platform for streaming and related services. The Platform\n should support and enhance the existing DRTV applications for streaming but also upholds\n the unwavering DR’s public service commitment. DR aims to significantly bolster our\n competitive stance in the rapidly expanding landscape of TV and streaming services.\n DR seeks a Platform that not only fosters exceptional user experiences, but also offers\n a well proven and solid framework for personalization and content management. DR’s\n platform of choice must facilitate effortless configuration of design, navigation,\n and content based on audience behaviour as well as empowering DR’s editorial teams\n to tailor an exceptional DRTV-experience, to all types of End-Users, from children,\n youngsters, teens, adults to seniors. DR’s success metrics revolve around effectively\n attracting and retaining the users. To achieve this, the Platform must support best\n of breed in user engagement and focus on minimizing churn. It is DR’s vision to achieve\n greater flexibility, market adaptability, get enhanced decision-making capabilities,\n and heightened competitiveness. DR aims to strike for the perfect and harmonious balance\n between standardization and bespoke development. The goal is to have a Platform that\n provides a framework to create a personalized streaming product making the time worth\n spend on DRTV. This should be supported by the integration to external recommendation\n engines as well as orchestrating and manually curation of content. DR aims to utilize\n the Platform to empower the editorial teams, with tools to customize a tailored digital\n experience. DR wants a flexible Platform which makes it easy to configure design,\n navigation, layout and ingest content behaviour to increase engagement and decrease\n churn, within the Platform. The Platform needs to integrate easily via well-documented\n APIs with other systems as it will be part of our existing tech- and eco-environment\n stack. The Platform serves as a central hub for planning, ingesting, managing, and\n showcasing/distributing videos and content to the End-user. Thus, the Platform serves\n as a control center for the Platform-workflow, and it is DR's ambition to create a\n well-founded Platform to ensure better integration, flexibility, and adaptability\n of DR’s apps.The main services (A-C) under the Contract are:A. Delivery of a Platform:\n A complete delivery of the Platform (as described above), including the necessary\n functionality, API and integrations B. Implementation of the Platform; a complete\n implementation of the Platform with the underlying implementation activities, including\n complying with the time schedule, establishment of the cooperation and test of the\n Platform C. Continuing services: Delivery of Operation, Maintenance and Support of\n the Platform while complying with service levels and processes. Furthermore, the Supplier\n shall – if ordered by DR – deliver Ordered Services under the Contract, including\n Adaptions and Consultancy Services.

Procedure identifier: 5c9894cc-e885-4777-8e6a-8767bbdeaed8

Previous notice: 3bcd2e03-434e-4b4d-a716-c49f3ec8a725-01

Internal identifier: 4811

Type of procedure: Negotiated with prior publication of a call for competition / competitive with negotiation

The procedure is accelerated: no

Main features of the procedure: Description of the procedure (Danish)The shortlisting of candidates invited to tender\n will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented the most relevant\n supplies, in relation to the main services put up for tender, see the description\n in description of procurement. The relevance assessment will be made on the basis\n of the extent to which the references, combined, document experience in the provision\n of services that are comparable to the main services put up for tender. In the evaluation\n of which candidates have documented the most relevant supplies, the contracting entity\n will award points to the candidates on a scale from 1-5 for each main service, based\n on the extent to which the references, combined, document relevant experience in providing\n the main services. On this basis, the candidate will be awarded a total score calculated\n as the average number of points awarded for the main services.

2.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract: Services

Main classification (cpv): 72000000 IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

Additional classification (cpv): 72210000 Programming services of packaged software products

Additional classification (cpv): 72220000 Systems and technical consultancy services

Additional classification (cpv): 72310000 Data-processing services

Additional classification (cpv): 72320000 Database services

2.1.2 Place of performance

Anywhere in the European Economic Area

2.1.3 Value

Estimated value excluding VAT: 48.000.000 Danish krone

2.1.4 General information

Call for competition is terminated

Additional information: An information meeting will be held at May the 7th 2024 at the address Emil Holms\n Kanal 20. For practical reasons, operators interested in participating in the meeting\n are asked to sign up via the electronic tendering system not later than 3 days before\n the meeting with indication of name of business and number of participants. The contracting\n entity may reduce the number of par-ticipants per business. The contracting entity\n will draw up brief minutes of the information meeting which will be announced to all\n tenderers participating in the tender procedure via the electronic tendering system.\n DR has assessed that the Platform and Related Services is connected services that\n aren’t suitable for division. The Platform is a single backend solution, and the Related\n Services is directly related to ensuring the operation and performance of the Platform.\n The contract is not divided into lots due to the objective of having a clear and unambiguous\n contractual relationship, where the overall responsibility for the Platform and the\n Services is placed with one supplier in order to ensure the highest possible quality,\n including efficient management, at the lowest possible price. Given that the Platform\n in ques-tion is relatively complex, DR believes that this objective would not be met\n by offering the services into lots. Instead, it is necessary to tender out the delivery\n and implementation of the Platform and the associated operation, maintenance, etc.,\n to the same supplier. This approach, in the contracting authority’s assessment, ensures\n the most effective implementation and overall operation of the Platform. The contract\n has incorporated the corporate social responsibility considerations, as appropriate,\n as laid down in the conventions on the basis of which the principles of the UN Global\n Compact are worded and as laid down in the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.\n The contract furthermore lays down requirements pursuant to ILO Convention no. 94\n on labour clauses in public contracts and Circular no. 9471 of 30 June 2014. The contract\n lays down requirements on compliance with the law on processing of personal data.\n If the contract is awarded to a group of operators (such as a consortium), the participants\n of the group must undertake joint and several liability and appoint a joint representative.\n Participation in the tender procedure may only take place by electronic means via\n the electronic tendering system used by the contracting entity. For access to the\n tender documents, the tenderer must be registered or register as a user. If the tender\n contains several versions of the same document, the latest uploaded version will apply.\n All communication in connection with the tender procedure, including questions and\n answers, must take place through the electronic tendering system. Questions must be\n submitted not later than the 22nd of May 2024. Questions asked after this date will\n be answered if they are received in time for the contracting entity to provide the\n information required and communicate the answers not later than six days before expiry\n of the application dead-line. Questions received later than six days before expiry\n of the deadline cannot expect to be answered unless the deadline is also postponed.\n Before the award decision is made, the tenderer to whom the contracting entity intends\n to award the contract must provide documentation of the information submitted in the\n ESPD pursuant to sections 151-152, cf. section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act. As an alternative to the documentation mentioned in sections 153-155, 157 and\n 158 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, the applicant and tenderer may submit to\n the contract-ing entity a certificate of registration in an official list of approved\n economic operators, see section 156 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, issued by\n the competent authority. The contracting entity only accepts certifi-cates of registration\n in an official list from applicants and tenderers established in the country holding\n the official list. The candidate must as its application submit an ESPD as preliminary\n documentation of the circumstances set out in section 148(1), paras 1-3 of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act (udbudsloven), and section 137(1) para 2 of the Danish Public\n Procurement Act. It is not necessary for the tenderer to sign the ESPD document. For\n groups of operators (e.g., a consortium), a separate ESPD must be submitted for each\n participating operator. Where the tenderer is a group of operators, the ESPD document\n of each participant in the group must be signed by the participant in question. The\n tenderer heading the group and submitting the tender is not re-quired to sign its\n ESPD document. If the tenderer relies on the capacities of other entities, an ESPD\n must be submitted for and signed by each of the entities on which the tenderer relies.\n In this procedure, the candidate may rely on the technical and/or financial capacity\n of other operators to fulfil the suitability requirements, including for the purpose\n of selection. The operator(s) making its/their technical and/or financial capacity\n available to the candidate must sign a letter of commitment, see further in the tender\n specifi-cations. The form is enclosed as an attachment to the tender specifications.\n The candidate must also submit a letter of commitment in which the entity/entities\n on which the candidate relies has/have undertaken joint and several liability with\n the candidate if the candidate is awarded the contract. The form is enclosed as an\n attachment to the tender specifications. The candidate will be excluded from participation\n in the tender procedure if the candidate is subject to the compulsory grounds for\n exclusion set out in sections 134 a, 135 and 136 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, and the exclusion grounds stated in the Danish Public Procurement Act, section\n 137(1), para 2, unless the candidate has submitted sufficient documentation of its\n reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. The\n voluntary grounds for exclusion are applied while complying with the principle of\n proportionality. Hence, trivial matters cannot result in the exclusion of the candidate.\n Several matters which, individually, are less seri-ous in nature may, however, give\n rise to exclusion of the candidate. -o0o- It should be noted that the estimated contract\n value stated in this notice is an estimate of the expected contract price for the\n entire term of the contract. The estimate is based on the knowledge obtained during\n the market analysis and a following calculation of the needed services, including\n the knowledge from the existing contact. The contracting entity may use the procedure\n of section 159(5) of the Danish Public Procurement Act in the event that applications\n or tenders do not comply with the formal requirements of the procurement documents.The\n contracting entity expects the negotiations to be concerning, the Contract, the Platform,\n The Services cost-drivers and cooperation, it is expected that there will be one negotiation\n meeting per tenderer and one negotiation round. For further information on the process\n of the negotiations, reference is made to the tender specifica-tions and the related\n Annexes B and C. The duration of the contract is 84 months from the Acceptance Date,\n cf. the Contract. In addition to the indicated duration of contract, an expiry phase\n that is flexible in time will be required when the contract is at an end in order\n to ensure an undisturbed continuation of the Platform in connection with a possible\n re-tender. -o0o- Due to an error in the contract notice DR chooses to cancel the procurement\n procedure, DR intents publish a new procedure within days.

Legal basis:

Directive 2014/24/EU

5 Lot

5.1 Lot technical ID: LOT-0000

Title: Contract for Purchase of the Platform for Streaming and Related Services

Internal identifier: 4811

5.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract: Services

Main classification (cpv): 72000000 IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

Additional classification (cpv): 72210000 Programming services of packaged software products

Additional classification (cpv): 72220000 Systems and technical consultancy services

Additional classification (cpv): 72310000 Data-processing services

Additional classification (cpv): 72320000 Database services

5.1.2 Place of performance

Anywhere in the European Economic Area

Additional information:

5.1.3 Estimated duration

Duration: 84 Month

5.1.5 Value

Estimated value excluding VAT: 48.000.000 Danish krone

5.1.6 General information

Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.

The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes

5.1.10 Award criteria

Criterion:

Type: Quality

Name: Platform

Description: Is evaluated on the basis of an overall assessment of the offered Platform. When conducting\n the assessment, DR will put emphasis on: • To which extent the offered Platform and\n the architecture of the Platform is stable, scalable and flexible, see Appendix 3,\n evaluation requirement ER-4 • To which extent the offered API in the Platform is effective\n and supports seamlessly integra-tion with other services and applications, see Appendix\n 3, evaluation requirement no. ER-16 • To which extent the offered Platform supports\n an effective, dynamic and intuitive content management, see Appendix 3, evaluation\n requirement no. ER-76, ER-79, ER-80 and ER-81 • To which extent the Platform supports\n a secure and efficient and personalized content delivery to End-User applications,\n see Appendix 3, evaluation requirement no. ER-77, ER-78 and ER-82

Weight (percentage, exact): 40

Criterion:

Type: Quality

Name: Time schedule, test and operation

Description: Is evaluated on the basis of an overall assessment of the offered time schedule, test\n and Operation. When conducting the assessment, DR will put emphasis on: • To which\n extent the offered time schedule is realistic and robust, see Appendix 1, evalua-tion\n requirement no. ER-13 and ER-14. • To which extent the offered test setup and test\n plans ensure that the Platform is tested ef-fectively and ensures a robust delivery\n of the Platform, see Appendix 6, evaluation re-quirement no. ER-16. • To which extent\n the offered methods and processes for Operation are efficient and ensures a secure\n and stable Operation of the Platform, see Appendix 7, evaluation requirements no.\n ER-14.

Weight (percentage, exact): 15

Criterion:

Type: Quality

Name: Support and cooperation

Description: Is evaluated on the basis of an overall assessment of the offered support and cooperation\n . When con-ducting the assessment, DR will put emphasis on: • To which extent the\n Supplier’ ensures that DR can access information easily, see Appendix 9, evaluation\n requirement no. ER-3. • To which extent the offered cooperation organisation is efficient\n and consistent in the delivery of the Services, see Appendix 11, evaluation requirements,\n no. ER-1. • To which extent the offered collaboration with DR and DR’s other suppliers\n is effective, see Ap-pendix 11, evaluation requirements no ER-2.

Weight (percentage, exact): 15

Criterion:

Type: Price

Name: Price

Description: Is evaluated on the basis of the total technical evaluation price, see Appendix 12\n – Prices, payment schedule and other prices.

Weight (percentage, exact): 30

5.1.12 Terms of procurement

Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, etc. (lov\n om Klagenævnet for Udbud m.v.) (the Act is available (in Danish) at www.retsinformation.dk),\n the following deadlines apply to the lodging of complaints: Complaints for not having\n been selected must be submitted to the Danish Complaints Board for Public Pro-curement\n before the expiry of 20 calendar days, see section 7(1) of the Act, from the day after\n submission of notification to the candidates concerned of the identity of the successful\n tenderer where the notification is ac-companied by an explanation of the grounds for\n the decision in accordance with section 2(1), para (1) of the Act and section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act. In other situations, complaints of award procedures,\n see section 7(2) of the Act, must be lodged with the Danish Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement before the expiry of: 1) 45 calendar days after the contracting entity\n has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union that the contracting\n entity has entered into a contract. The deadline is calculated from the day after\n the day when the notice was published. 2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day\n after the day when the contracting entity has notified the candidates concerned that\n a contract based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic\n pur-chasing system has been entered into where the notification has included an explanation\n of the relevant grounds for the decision. 3) 6 months after the contracting entity\n entered into a framework agreement calculated from the day after the day when the\n contracting entity notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, see section 2(2)\n of the Act and section 171(4) of the Danish Public Procurement Act. 4) 20 calendar\n days calculated from the day after the contracting entity has submitted notification\n of its deci-sion, see section 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.Not later\n than at the time of lodging a complaint with the Danish Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement, the complainant must notify the contracting entity in writing that a\n complaint has been lodged with the Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n and whether the appeal was lodged during the standstill period, see section 6(4) of\n the Act. In cases where the complaint was not lodged within the standstill period,\n the complainant must furthermore indicate whether a suspensory effect of the complaint\n has been requested, see section 12(1) of the Act.The e-mail address of the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement is set out in this notice. The Complaints Board’s own\n complaints procedure is available at https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/vejledning/

5.1.15 Techniques

Framework agreement:

No framework agreement

Information about the dynamic purchasing system:

No dynamic purchase system

5.1.16 Further information, mediation and review

Review organisation: Klagenævnet for udbud

Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA