2 Procedure

2.1 Procedure

Titel: EU-procurement - Competitive procedure with negotiation – Tender for new thermal oil\n bundles for Renseanlæg Avedøre, Denmark Teknisk afdeling - EU-udbud

Beskrivelse: The Thermal Oil Bundles at Renseanlæg Avedøre, is nearing its end-of-life status,\n and the Contracting Authority is therefore in need of a supplier to supply a new set\n of Thermal Oil Bundles, including decommissioning of the old bundles, delivery of\n the new bundles and installation of these. The current bundles have been in service\n for approximately 25 years, and are an integrated part of the economizer part of the\n sludge incineration plant at Avedøre Wastewater Treatment PlantThis procurement is\n for: Design and build contract regarding replacement of the thermal oil bundles in\n the economizer part of the sludge incineration plant at Avedøre Wastewater Treatment\n Plant, including decommissioning of the current bundles. (the \"Contract\").The tasks\n are described in more detail in “Appendix 5 – Technical Specification for Replacement\n of Thermal Oil Bundles”, including sub-appendix.One (1) contract will be entered into\n with one (1) Contractor.The Contracting Authority has decided not to divide the contract\n into lots. This decision is based on the complexity of the works, for which a single\n contractual arrangement is considered necessary to ensure effective project management\n and clear allocation of responsibility. Furthermore, the Contracting Authority considers\n that a single contract will represent a more attractive commercial opportunity and\n generate economies of scale, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving a sufficient\n level of market interest and competition to ensure the best possible outcome for the\n procurement.Moreover, a single contract will reduce the number of interfaces between\n contractors and minimize the risks associated with coordination, integration and overall\n project delivery.

Identifikator for proceduren: 5a682369-9005-4e2e-8e85-8179f8a315d8

Intern ID: 287746288

Udbudsprocedure: Udbud med forhandling/indkaldelse af tilbud med forudgående offentliggørelse

Proceduren er en hasteprocedure: nej

Hovedpunkterne i proceduren: The procurement will be carried out as a competitive procedure with negotiation in\n accordance with the Danish Public Procurement Act (Consolidated Act no. 10/ 2023,\n as amended) (Udbudsloven), cf. § 61(1)(c) as the contract cannot be awarded without\n prior negotiation due to special circumstances with regard to its complexity, including\n legal, financial and technical conditions and risks in connection with the contract.The\n competitive procedure with negotiation means that the process - in general - contains\n the following activities:On the basis of the Contract Notice, companies can apply\n for pre-qualification (\"open round\").On the basis of the prequalification applications\n received, 3 companies are prequalified.Only pre-qualified companies can submit tenders\n (\"closed round\").After the tender deadline has expired, the Contracting Authority\n may choose to award the contract on the basis of the initial tenders without negotiation.\n Alternatively, the Contracting Authority may decide to initiate negotiations.After\n the tender deadline has expired (and after a possible negotiation process, the Contracting\n Authority awards the contract to the Tenderer who has submitted the most economically\n advantageous tender.

2.1.1 Formål

Kontraktens hovedformål: Varer

Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser

Primær klassifikation (cpv): 42511100 Varmevekslere

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 42160000 Kedelinstallationer

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 45351000 Maskintekniske installationsarbejder

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71320000 Ingeniørmæssig projektering

2.1.2 Udførelsessted

Postadresse: Kanalholmen 28

By: Hvidovre

Postnummer: 2650

Landsdel (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Land: Danmark

2.1.4 Generelle oplysninger

Yderligere oplysninger: The Contracting Authority has decided not to divide the contract into lots. This decision\n is based on the complexity of the works, for which a single contractual arrangement\n is considered necessary to ensure effective project management and clear allocation\n of responsibility. Furthermore, the Contracting Authority considers that a single\n contract will represent a more attractive commercial opportunity and generate economies\n of scale, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving a sufficient level of market\n interest and competition to ensure the best possible outcome for the procurement.
Moreover,\n a single contract will reduce the number of interfaces between contractors and minimize\n the risks associated with coordination, integration and overall project delivery

Is\n the economic operator established in a country that is included on the EU list of\n non-cooperative tax jurisdictions and has not acceded to the WTO Government Procurement\n Agreement or other trade agreements obliging Denmark to open the public procurement\n market to tenderers established in that country
The contracting authority shall\n also exclude economic operators that are subject to EU sanctions under Article 5k\n of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, as amended, concerning restrictive measures\n in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine.

6.1 Questions

All\n questions must be submitted via the e-Procurement Portal.

Applicants are\n encouraged to submit any questions as soon as possible and no later than on
the\n date set out in section 5.

All questions (including questions received after\n the above \"deadline\") will be answered, to the extent that it is possible to come\n up with an answer no later than 6 calendar days before the deadline for request to\n participate.

Applicants are encouraged to use the “Template for submitting\n questions” provided with the tender documents.

The completed form may include\n one or more questions, but applicants are not allowed to add further questions once\n the form has been submitted to the Contracting Authority. Any
further questions\n may be submitted subsequently using a new template for submitting questions.

Questions\n and answers, as well as any amendment sheets, will be published to all applicants,\n in anonymized form, on the e-Procurement Portal.

Means of proof: The tenderer\n in line to be awarded the Contract shall, upon request (not as part of the request\n for participation), submit a Certificate of Service (for Danish companies) or equivalent\n documentation (for foreign companies) as evidence that the Tenderer is not subject\n to any of the exclusion grounds referred to above.

The Contracting Authority\n will accept Certificates of Service and equivalents issued no later than 6 months\n prior to the deadline for submission of final tenders.

The reference list,\n which must be included in the ESPD as mentioned above, is considered by the Contracting\n Authority to be the final documentation of the Applicant's technical and professional\n ability.

For applicants relying on the capacity of other entities to meet\n the minimum requirements, it is also a requirement that the Applicant, as part of\n the documentation, must submit a Declaration of support (Appendix D) or equivalent\n documentation demonstrating that the respective entity is legally bound to the Applicant.

Retsgrundlag:

Direktiv 2014/24/EU

2.1.6 Udelukkelsesgrunde

Kilder til grundlag for udelukkelse: Bekendtgørelse

Korruption: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for bestikkelse\n ved en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden, eller hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat\n direkte i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse? Som defineret i artikel 3 i konventionen\n om bekæmpelse af bestikkelse, som involverer tjenestemænd ved De Europæiske Fællesskaber\n eller i Den Europæiske Unions medlemsstater (EFT C 195 af 25.6.1997, s. 1), og i artikel\n 2, stk. 1, i Rådets rammeafgørelse 2003/568/RIA af 22. juli 2003 om bekæmpelse af\n bestikkelse i den private sektor (EUT L 192 af 31.7.2003, s. 54). Denne udelukkelsesgrund\n omfatter også bestikkelse som defineret i den nationale ret gældende for den ordregivende\n myndighed (den ordregivende enhed) eller den økonomiske aktør.

Svig: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for svig ved\n en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden, eller hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte\n i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse? Som omhandlet i artikel 1 i konventionen om beskyttelse\n af De Europæiske Fællesskabers finansielle interesser (EFT C 316 af 27.11.1995, s.\n 48).

Hvidvaskning af penge eller finansiering af terrorisme: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for hvidvaskning\n af penge eller finansiering af terrorisme ved en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden,\n eller hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse?\n Som defineret i artikel 1 i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2005/60/EF af 26.\n oktober 2005 om forebyggende foranstaltninger mod anvendelse af det finansielle system\n til hvidvaskning af penge og finansiering af terrorisme (EUT L 309 af 25.11.2005,\n s. 15).

Deltagelse i en kriminel organisation: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for deltagelse\n i en kriminel organisation ved en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden, eller hvori en\n udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse? Som defineret\n i artikel 2 i Rådets rammeafgørelse 2008/841/RIA af 24. oktober 2008 om bekæmpelse\n af organiseret kriminalitet (EUT L 300 af 11.11.2008, s. 42).

Terrorhandlinger eller strafbare handlinger med forbindelse til terroraktivitet: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for terrorhandlinger\n eller strafbare handlinger med forbindelse til terroraktivitet ved en dom afsagt for\n højst fem år siden, eller hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte i dommen fortsat\n finder anvendelse? Som defineret i henholdsvis artikel 1 og 3 i Rådets rammeafgørelse\n 2002/475/RIA af 13. juni 2002 om bekæmpelse af terrorisme (EFT L 164 af 22.6.2002,\n s. 3). Denne udelukkelsesgrund omfatter også anstiftelse, medvirken og forsøg på at\n begå sådanne handlinger som omhandlet i nævnte rammeafgørelses artikel 4.

Børnearbejde og andre former for menneskehandel: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for børnearbejde\n og andre former for menneskehandel ved en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden, eller\n hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse? Som\n defineret i artikel 2 i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2011/36/EU af 5. april\n 2011 om forebyggelse og bekæmpelse af menneskehandel og beskyttelse af ofrene herfor,\n og om erstatning af Rådets rammeafgørelse 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 af 15.4.2011, s.\n 1).

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser på miljølovgivningsområdet: Er den økonomiske aktør bekendt med at have tilsidesat sine forpligtelser på miljølovgivningsområdet?\n Således som de i forbindelse med dette udbud fremgår af national ret, den relevante\n meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne eller artikel 18, stk. 2, i direktiv 2014/24/EU.

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser på det arbejdsretlige område: Er den økonomiske aktør bekendt med at have tilsidesat sine forpligtelser på det arbejdsretlige\n område? Således som de i forbindelse med dette udbud fremgår af national ret, den\n relevante meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne eller artikel 18, stk. 2, i direktiv\n 2014/24/EU.

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser på sociallovgivningsområdet: Er den økonomiske aktør bekendt med at have tilsidesat sine forpligtelser på sociallovgivningsområdet?\n Således som de i forbindelse med dette udbud fremgår af national ret, den relevante\n meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne eller artikel 18, stk. 2, i direktiv 2014/24/EU.

Aftaler med andre økonomiske aktører med henblik på konkurrencefordrejning: Har den økonomiske aktør indgået aftaler med andre økonomiske aktører med henblik\n på konkurrencefordrejning?

Alvorlige forsømmelser i forbindelse med udøvelsen af erhvervet: Har den økonomiske aktør i forbindelse med udøvelsen af erhvervet gjort sig skyldig\n i alvorlige forsømmelser? Hvis det er relevant, se definitioner i national ret, den\n relevante meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne.

Afgivelse af urigtige oplysninger, tilbageholdelse af oplysninger, ude af stand til at fremlægge de dokumenter, der anmodes om, eller indhentede fortrolige oplysninger i forbindelse med denne procedure: Har den økonomiske aktør befundet sig i en af følgende situationer:a) Denne har afgivet\n groft urigtige oplysninger ved meddelelsen af de oplysninger, der kræves til verifikation\n af, at der ikke er grundlag for udelukkelse, eller af at udvælgelseskriterierne er\n opfyldt,b) Denne har tilbageholdt sådanne oplysninger,c) Denne har været ude af stand\n til straks at fremsende den supplerende dokumentation, som en ordregivende myndighed\n eller en ordregivende enhed anmoder om, ogd) Denne har uretmæssigt påvirket den ordregivende\n myndigheds eller den ordregivende enheds beslutningsproces, indhentet fortrolige oplysninger,\n der kan give denne uretmæssige fordele i forbindelse med udbudsproceduren, eller uagtsomt\n givet vildledende oplysninger, der kan have væsentlig indflydelse på beslutninger\n vedrørende udelukkelse, udvælgelse eller tildeling?

Interessekonflikt som følge af deltagelse i udbudsproceduren: Er den økonomiske aktør opmærksom på en interessekonflikt, jf. national ret, den relevante\n meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne, som følge af sin deltagelse i udbudsproceduren?

Direkte eller indirekte involvering i forberedelsen af denne udbudsprocedure: Har den økonomiske aktør eller en virksomhed, der er knyttet til den økonomiske aktør,\n rådgivet den ordregivende myndighed eller den ordregivende enhed eller på anden måde\n været involveret i forberedelsen af udbudsproceduren?

Ophævelse eller en lignende sanktion: Har den økonomiske aktør væsentligt misligholdt en tidligere offentlig kontrakt, en\n tidligere kontrakt med en ordregivende enhed eller en tidligere koncessionskontrakt,\n hvor misligholdelsen har medført den pågældende kontrakts ophævelse eller en lignende\n sanktion?

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser i henhold til rent nationale udelukkelsesgrunde: Andre udelukkelsesgrunde, der måtte være fastsat i den ordregivende myndigheds eller\n den ordregivende enheds medlemsstats lovgivning. Finder de rent nationale udelukkelsesgrunde,\n der er anført i den relevante meddelelse eller i udbudsdokumenterne, anvendelse?

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af bidrag til sociale sikringsordninger: Har den økonomiske aktør tilsidesat sine forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af bidrag\n til sociale sikringsordninger både i det land, hvor den økonomiske aktør er etableret,\n og i den ordregivende myndigheds eller den ordregivende enheds medlemsstat, hvis denne\n er en anden end etableringslandet?

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af skatter og afgifter: Har den økonomiske aktør tilsidesat sine forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af skatter\n og afgifter både i det land, hvor den økonomiske aktør er etableret, og i den ordregivende\n myndigheds eller den ordregivende enheds medlemsstat, hvis denne er en anden end etableringslandet?

Erhvervsvirksomheden er indstillet: Er den økonomiske aktørs erhvervsvirksomhed blevet indstillet?

Konkurs: Er den økonomiske aktør gået konkurs?

Tvangsakkord uden for konkurs: Er den økonomiske aktør under tvangsakkord uden for konkurs?

Insolvens: Er den økonomiske aktør under insolvens- eller likvidationsbehandling?

Aktiver, der administreres af en kurator: Administreres den økonomiske aktørs aktiver af en kurator eller af retten?

En situation, der svarer til konkurs i henhold til national ret: Er den økonomiske aktør i en situation, som svarer til konkurs i henhold til en tilsvarende\n procedure, der er fastsat i national ret?

5 Delkontrakt

5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0000

Titel: EU-procurement - Competitive procedure with negotiation – Tender for new thermal oil\n bundles for Renseanlæg Avedøre, Denmark Teknisk afdeling - EU-udbud

Intern ID: 287746288

5.1.1 Formål

Kontraktens hovedformål: Varer

Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser

Primær klassifikation (cpv): 42511100 Varmevekslere

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 42160000 Kedelinstallationer

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 45351000 Maskintekniske installationsarbejder

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71320000 Ingeniørmæssig projektering

Valgmuligheder:

Beskrivelse af optioner: The tender includes the following Options:
-
Shielding of first row of tubes\n in the top bundle, to protect against erosion.
The Options are described in more\n detail in Appendix 4 – Technical Specification for Replacement of Thermal Oil Bundles.

5.1.2 Udførelsessted

Postadresse: Kanalholmen 28

By: Hvidovre

Postnummer: 2650

Landsdel (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Land: Danmark

Yderligere oplysninger:

5.1.3 Anslået varighed

Startdato: 10-01-2027

Varigheds slutdato: 31-12-2027

5.1.6 Generelle oplysninger

Reserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.

Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler

Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): nej

5.1.7 Strategiske udbud

5.1.9 Udvælgelseskriterier

Kilder til udvælgelseskriterier: code|name|document-used-in-public-procurement.epo-sub-espd

Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:

Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 3

Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 3

Køberen forbeholder sig retten til at tildele kontrakten på grundlag af de indledende tilbud uden yderligere forhandlinger

5.1.10 Tildelingskriterier

Kriterium:

Type: Pris

Navn: Price

Beskrivelse: Evaluation of the sub-criterion “price”:
The sub-criterion ‘price’ will be assessed\n on the basis of the answers provided by the Tenderer when filling in Appendix 5 –\n Tender List. The evaluation will be based on the Tenderer’s stated prices, exclusive\n of VAT, but inclusive of all other costs.
The total evaluation price is automatically\n added up in Appendix 5 – Tender List.
The evaluation model used for the sub-criterion\n ‘Price’ is described below.
Primary evaluation model
The total evaluation\n prices will be evaluated relatively and based on a linear score model from 0 – 10\n points. The ‘lowest total evaluation price’ among the compliant tenders cf. Prequalification\n and Tender conditions section 7.6, is awarded 10 points. A total evaluation price\n equal to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus X % or above will be awarded 0 points,\n however, subject to the use of the below secondary and tertiary evaluation models\n if the conditions for this have been met.
Other total evaluation prices are awarded\n points based on the following formula:
=( ℎ − )/ ℎ = − ∗ where X is thus set\n at 50 %
If the following secondary or tertiary evaluation model is used, the above\n formula is adjusted accordingly.
The awarded points will be multiplied by the\n weighting of the price sub-criterion in the overall evaluation.
Secondary evaluation\n model
If it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of half or more of\n the compliant tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 50 %,\n X is fixed at 75 %. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation\n price’ plus 75 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points.
Tertiary evaluation model
If\n it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of half or more of the compliant\n tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 75 %, X is fixed at\n 100 %. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’\n plus 100 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points.

Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)

Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 35

Kriterium:

Type: Kvalitet

Navn: Timeline

Beskrivelse: Consist of:
o Production time off site - 25 %
o Installation time on site\n - 75 %

- Sub-criterion “Production time off site”

Evaluation of\n the qualitative subfactor ‘production time off site’:
This sub-criterion will\n be evaluated on the basis of the responses provided by the Tenderers in Appendix 6\n – Tender response, where the Tenderers are requested to address the following matters:
•\n A timetable with milestones for the period from contract conclusion until delivery\n on site at the Contracting Authority. Insert concrete dates.
• Clear identification\n of responsibility for the milestones.
• Who is to provide which inputs, information,\n etc. in connection with each individual item.

The Contracting Authority will\n regard it as positive if:
• The timetable is assessed as realistic and robust\n and includes:
o clear indications of responsibility
o which resources of the\n Contracting Authority the Tenderer intends to use, including the expected scope thereof,\n and that such use is proportionate and appropriate
o which information the Contracting\n Authority is to provide, and that such information is proportionate and appropriate
•\n A shorter time period from contract conclusion until delivery on site is better than\n a longer time period.

Points are awarded based on:
• Tenders are evaluated\n in accordance with an absolute model, cf. the points scale in Prequalification and\n Tender Conditions section 8.5.
• The Contracting Authority must make an overall\n assessment of the sub-criterion/each part criterion in the tender.
• The Contracting\n Authority will assess whether the answer appears well documented.
• The Contracting\n Authority will assess the extent to which the Tenderer can render probable the Tenderer’s\n capacity to comply with the items listed, for example supported by experience and\n documentation.

- Sub-criterion “Installation time on site”
Evaluation\n of the qualitative subfactor ‘installation time on site’:
This sub-criterion will\n be evaluated on the basis of the responses provided by the Tenderers in Appendix 6\n – Tender response, where the Tenderers are requested to address the following matters:
•\n A timetable with milestones for the period from delivery on site at the Contracting\n Authority until final takeover of the Plant. Insert number of days, each part of the\n timetable requires
• Clear identification of responsibility for the milestones.
•\n Who is to provide which inputs, information, etc. in connection with each individual\n item.
• Clear identification on which activities incl. time is needed with the\n oven out of service (downtime)

The Contracting Authority will regard it as\n positive if:
• The timetable is assessed as realistic and robust and includes:
o\n clear indications of responsibility
o which resources of the Contracting Authority\n the Tenderer intends to use, including the expected scope thereof, and that such use\n is proportionate and appropriate
o which information the Contracting Authority\n is to provide, and that such information is proportionate and appropriate
• A\n shorter time period from delivery on site until final takeover of the Plant is better\n than a longer time period.
• A shorter time period where the oven is out of service\n (downtime).
o It is better to have a longer time in total with a shorter time\n when the oven is out of service (downtime).

Points are awarded based on:
•\n Tenders are evaluated in accordance with an absolute model, cf. the points scale in\n Prequalification and Tender Conditions section 8.5.
• The Contracting Authority\n must make an overall assessment of the sub-criterion/each part criterion in the tender.
•\n The Contracting Authority will assess whether the answer appears well documented.
•\n The Contracting Authority will assess the extent to which the Tenderer can render\n probable the Tenderer’s capacity to comply with the items listed, for example supported\n by experience and documentation.

Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)

Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 40

Kriterium:

Type: Kvalitet

Navn: Method statement for installation and dismantling

Beskrivelse: Evaluation of the qualitative subfactor ‘method statement for installation and dismantling’:
This\n sub-criterion will be evaluated on the basis of the responses provided by the Tenderers\n in Appendix 6 – Tender response, where the Tenderers are requested to address the\n following matters:
• Describe the proposed methodology for dismantling, removal\n and disposal of the existing thermal oil bundles, including lifting operations, waste\n management and environmental considerations.
• Describe the proposed methodology\n for fabrication, delivery, installation and commissioning of the new thermal oil bundles,\n including quality assurance and testing activities.
• Describe the Tenderer's\n health, safety and environmental (HSE) management approach for carrying out the works

The\n Contracting Authority will regard it as positive if:
• The proposed methodology\n is detailed, realistic and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the technical\n and practical challenges associated with the assignment.
• The proposed methodology\n includes well-documented measures to ensure a safe execution of the works and minimize\n risks to personnel, facilities and the environment.
• The Tenderer demonstrates\n a robust quality management approach, including inspection, testing and documentation\n procedures for the manufactured bundles.
• The Tenderer demonstrates an effective\n approach to planning and execution that minimizes downtime and ensures timely completion\n of the works.

The Tenderer supports the proposed methodology with relevant\n references, lessons learned from similar projects and clear evidence of previous experience.
Points\n are awarded based on:
• Tenders are evaluated in accordance with an absolute model,\n cf. the points scale in Prequalification and Tender Conditions section 8.5.
•\n The Contracting Authority must make an overall assessment of the sub-criterion/each\n part criterion in the tender.
• The Contracting Authority will assess whether\n the methodology is specific, coherent and sufficiently documented.
• The Contracting\n Authority will assess the extent to which the Tenderer can render probable the Tenderer’s\n capacity to comply with the items listed, for example supported by experience and\n documentation.
• The item concerning the project execution plan and measures to\n minimize downtime weighs more heavily than the other items.

Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)

Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 25

5.1.11 Tilbudsdokumenter

Sprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk

Frist for anmodning om yderligere oplysninger: 11-08-2026 21:55 +00:00

Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://permalink.mercell.com/287746288.aspx

5.1.12 Tilbudsvilkår

Vilkår for proceduren:

Den påtænkte dato for afsendelse af opfordringerne til at afgive tilbud: 28-08-2026

Vilkår for indgivelse:

Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet

Indgivelsesadresse: https://permalink.mercell.com/287746288.aspx

Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk

Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt

Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt

Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt

Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 18-08-2026 10:00 +00:00

Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:

Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej

Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The contract contains social clauses and labour clauses.

Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet

Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej

Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja

5.1.15 Teknikker

Rammeaftale:

Ingen rammeaftale

Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:

Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem

5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgang

Organisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for Udbud - Nævnenes Hus

Oplysninger om klagefrister: I henhold til LBK nr. 448 af 8.5.2024 om Klagenævnet for Udbud (med senere ændringer)\n gælder følgende frister for indgivelse af klage:

Klage over udbud\n eller beslutninger omfattet af udbudslovens afsnit II eller III eller forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet,\n som ikke er omfattet af særlige bestemmelser om prækvalifikation, skal være indgivet\n til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden:

45 kalenderdage efter, at ordregiveren har\n offentliggjort en bekendtgørelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende om, at ordregiveren\n har indgået en kontrakt. Fristen regnes fra dagen efter den dag, hvor bekendtgørelsen\n er blevet offentliggjort.

Klage over indgåelse af en kontrakt\n baseret på en rammeaftale med genåbning af konkurrencen eller et dynamisk indkøbssystem\n omfattet af udbudslovens afsnit II eller III eller forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet\n skal være indgivet til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden;

30 kalenderdage regnet\n fra dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har underrettet de berørte tilbudsgivere\n om, at kontrakten er indgået, forudsat at underretningen har indeholdt en begrundelse\n for beslutningen.

Klage over indgåelse af rammeaftaler efter udbudslovens\n afsnit II, III og §§ 191 og 192, efter tilbudsloven eller forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet\n skal være indgivet til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden:

6 måneder regnet fra\n dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har underrettet de berørte ansøgere og tilbudsgivere\n om tildelingsbeslutningen. naevneneshus.dk

Klage over en ordregivers\n beslutning om at videreføre en kontrakt, jf. udbudslovens § 185, stk. 2, skal være\n indgivet til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden:

20 kalenderdage regnet fra dagen\n efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har meddelt sin beslutning.

Har\n en ordregiver fulgt proceduren i lovens § 4 for at sikre, at en kontrakt ikke erklæres\n for uden virkning, skal en klage over, at ordregiveren i strid med udbudsdirektivet\n eller forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet har indgået en kontrakt uden forudgående offentliggørelse\n af en udbudsbekendtgørelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende, være indgivet til Klagenævnet\n for Udbud inden

30 kalenderdage regnet fra dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren\n har offentliggjort en sådan bekendtgørelse, forudsat at bekendtgørelsen med henblik\n på frivillig forudgående gennemsigtighed indeholder begrundelsen for ordregiverens\n beslutning.

Senest samtidig med, at en klage indgives til Klagenævnet\n for Udbud, skal klageren skriftligt underrette ordregiveren om, at klage indgives\n til Klagenævnet for Udbud, og om, hvorvidt klagen er indgivet i standstill-perioden\n efter lovens § 3, stk. 1 eller 2, eller i den periode på 10 kalenderdage, som er fastsat\n i § 4, stk. 1, nr. 2. Hvis klagen ikke er indgivet i disse perioder, skal klageren\n tillige angive, om der begæres opsættende virkning, jf. lovens § 12, stk. 1.

Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

Organisation, der modtager ansøgninger om deltagelse: BIOFOS A/S

Organisation, der behandler tilbud: BIOFOS A/S

2 Procedure

2.1 Procedure

Title: EU-procurement - Competitive procedure with negotiation – Tender for new thermal oil\n bundles for Renseanlæg Avedøre, Denmark Teknisk afdeling - EU-udbud

Description: The Thermal Oil Bundles at Renseanlæg Avedøre, is nearing its end-of-life status,\n and the Contracting Authority is therefore in need of a supplier to supply a new set\n of Thermal Oil Bundles, including decommissioning of the old bundles, delivery of\n the new bundles and installation of these. The current bundles have been in service\n for approximately 25 years, and are an integrated part of the economizer part of the\n sludge incineration plant at Avedøre Wastewater Treatment PlantThis procurement is\n for: Design and build contract regarding replacement of the thermal oil bundles in\n the economizer part of the sludge incineration plant at Avedøre Wastewater Treatment\n Plant, including decommissioning of the current bundles. (the \"Contract\").The tasks\n are described in more detail in “Appendix 5 – Technical Specification for Replacement\n of Thermal Oil Bundles”, including sub-appendix.One (1) contract will be entered into\n with one (1) Contractor.The Contracting Authority has decided not to divide the contract\n into lots. This decision is based on the complexity of the works, for which a single\n contractual arrangement is considered necessary to ensure effective project management\n and clear allocation of responsibility. Furthermore, the Contracting Authority considers\n that a single contract will represent a more attractive commercial opportunity and\n generate economies of scale, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving a sufficient\n level of market interest and competition to ensure the best possible outcome for the\n procurement.Moreover, a single contract will reduce the number of interfaces between\n contractors and minimize the risks associated with coordination, integration and overall\n project delivery.

Procedure identifier: 5a682369-9005-4e2e-8e85-8179f8a315d8

Internal identifier: 287746288

Type of procedure: Negotiated with prior publication of a call for competition / competitive with negotiation

The procedure is accelerated: no

Main features of the procedure: The procurement will be carried out as a competitive procedure with negotiation in\n accordance with the Danish Public Procurement Act (Consolidated Act no. 10/ 2023,\n as amended) (Udbudsloven), cf. § 61(1)(c) as the contract cannot be awarded without\n prior negotiation due to special circumstances with regard to its complexity, including\n legal, financial and technical conditions and risks in connection with the contract.The\n competitive procedure with negotiation means that the process - in general - contains\n the following activities:On the basis of the Contract Notice, companies can apply\n for pre-qualification (\"open round\").On the basis of the prequalification applications\n received, 3 companies are prequalified.Only pre-qualified companies can submit tenders\n (\"closed round\").After the tender deadline has expired, the Contracting Authority\n may choose to award the contract on the basis of the initial tenders without negotiation.\n Alternatively, the Contracting Authority may decide to initiate negotiations.After\n the tender deadline has expired (and after a possible negotiation process, the Contracting\n Authority awards the contract to the Tenderer who has submitted the most economically\n advantageous tender.

2.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract: Supplies

Additional nature of the contract: Services

Main classification (cpv): 42511100 Heat-exchange units

Additional classification (cpv): 42160000 Boiler installations

Additional classification (cpv): 45351000 Mechanical engineering installation works

Additional classification (cpv): 71320000 Engineering design services

2.1.2 Place of performance

Postal address: Kanalholmen 28

Town: Hvidovre

Postcode: 2650

Country subdivision (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Country: Denmark

2.1.4 General information

Additional information: The Contracting Authority has decided not to divide the contract into lots. This decision\n is based on the complexity of the works, for which a single contractual arrangement\n is considered necessary to ensure effective project management and clear allocation\n of responsibility. Furthermore, the Contracting Authority considers that a single\n contract will represent a more attractive commercial opportunity and generate economies\n of scale, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving a sufficient level of market\n interest and competition to ensure the best possible outcome for the procurement.
Moreover,\n a single contract will reduce the number of interfaces between contractors and minimize\n the risks associated with coordination, integration and overall project delivery

Is\n the economic operator established in a country that is included on the EU list of\n non-cooperative tax jurisdictions and has not acceded to the WTO Government Procurement\n Agreement or other trade agreements obliging Denmark to open the public procurement\n market to tenderers established in that country
The contracting authority shall\n also exclude economic operators that are subject to EU sanctions under Article 5k\n of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, as amended, concerning restrictive measures\n in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine.

6.1 Questions

All\n questions must be submitted via the e-Procurement Portal.

Applicants are\n encouraged to submit any questions as soon as possible and no later than on
the\n date set out in section 5.

All questions (including questions received after\n the above \"deadline\") will be answered, to the extent that it is possible to come\n up with an answer no later than 6 calendar days before the deadline for request to\n participate.

Applicants are encouraged to use the “Template for submitting\n questions” provided with the tender documents.

The completed form may include\n one or more questions, but applicants are not allowed to add further questions once\n the form has been submitted to the Contracting Authority. Any
further questions\n may be submitted subsequently using a new template for submitting questions.

Questions\n and answers, as well as any amendment sheets, will be published to all applicants,\n in anonymized form, on the e-Procurement Portal.

Means of proof: The tenderer\n in line to be awarded the Contract shall, upon request (not as part of the request\n for participation), submit a Certificate of Service (for Danish companies) or equivalent\n documentation (for foreign companies) as evidence that the Tenderer is not subject\n to any of the exclusion grounds referred to above.

The Contracting Authority\n will accept Certificates of Service and equivalents issued no later than 6 months\n prior to the deadline for submission of final tenders.

The reference list,\n which must be included in the ESPD as mentioned above, is considered by the Contracting\n Authority to be the final documentation of the Applicant's technical and professional\n ability.

For applicants relying on the capacity of other entities to meet\n the minimum requirements, it is also a requirement that the Applicant, as part of\n the documentation, must submit a Declaration of support (Appendix D) or equivalent\n documentation demonstrating that the respective entity is legally bound to the Applicant.

Legal basis:

Directive 2014/24/EU

2.1.6 Grounds for exclusion

Sources of grounds for exclusion: Notice

Corruption: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for bestikkelse\n ved en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden, eller hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat\n direkte i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse? Som defineret i artikel 3 i konventionen\n om bekæmpelse af bestikkelse, som involverer tjenestemænd ved De Europæiske Fællesskaber\n eller i Den Europæiske Unions medlemsstater (EFT C 195 af 25.6.1997, s. 1), og i artikel\n 2, stk. 1, i Rådets rammeafgørelse 2003/568/RIA af 22. juli 2003 om bekæmpelse af\n bestikkelse i den private sektor (EUT L 192 af 31.7.2003, s. 54). Denne udelukkelsesgrund\n omfatter også bestikkelse som defineret i den nationale ret gældende for den ordregivende\n myndighed (den ordregivende enhed) eller den økonomiske aktør.

Fraud: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for svig ved\n en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden, eller hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte\n i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse? Som omhandlet i artikel 1 i konventionen om beskyttelse\n af De Europæiske Fællesskabers finansielle interesser (EFT C 316 af 27.11.1995, s.\n 48).

Money laundering or terrorist financing: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for hvidvaskning\n af penge eller finansiering af terrorisme ved en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden,\n eller hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse?\n Som defineret i artikel 1 i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2005/60/EF af 26.\n oktober 2005 om forebyggende foranstaltninger mod anvendelse af det finansielle system\n til hvidvaskning af penge og finansiering af terrorisme (EUT L 309 af 25.11.2005,\n s. 15).

Participation in a criminal organisation: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for deltagelse\n i en kriminel organisation ved en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden, eller hvori en\n udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse? Som defineret\n i artikel 2 i Rådets rammeafgørelse 2008/841/RIA af 24. oktober 2008 om bekæmpelse\n af organiseret kriminalitet (EUT L 300 af 11.11.2008, s. 42).

Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for terrorhandlinger\n eller strafbare handlinger med forbindelse til terroraktivitet ved en dom afsagt for\n højst fem år siden, eller hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte i dommen fortsat\n finder anvendelse? Som defineret i henholdsvis artikel 1 og 3 i Rådets rammeafgørelse\n 2002/475/RIA af 13. juni 2002 om bekæmpelse af terrorisme (EFT L 164 af 22.6.2002,\n s. 3). Denne udelukkelsesgrund omfatter også anstiftelse, medvirken og forsøg på at\n begå sådanne handlinger som omhandlet i nævnte rammeafgørelses artikel 4.

Child labour and including other forms of trafficking in human beings: Er den økonomiske aktør selv eller en person, der tilhører den økonomiske aktørs administrations-,\n ledelses- eller tilsynsorgan eller har beføjelse til at repræsentere eller kontrollere\n eller til at træffe beslutninger heri, ved en endelig dom blevet dømt for børnearbejde\n og andre former for menneskehandel ved en dom afsagt for højst fem år siden, eller\n hvori en udelukkelsesperiode fastsat direkte i dommen fortsat finder anvendelse? Som\n defineret i artikel 2 i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2011/36/EU af 5. april\n 2011 om forebyggelse og bekæmpelse af menneskehandel og beskyttelse af ofrene herfor,\n og om erstatning af Rådets rammeafgørelse 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 af 15.4.2011, s.\n 1).

Breaching of obligations in the fields of environmental law: Er den økonomiske aktør bekendt med at have tilsidesat sine forpligtelser på miljølovgivningsområdet?\n Således som de i forbindelse med dette udbud fremgår af national ret, den relevante\n meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne eller artikel 18, stk. 2, i direktiv 2014/24/EU.

Breaching of obligations in the fields of labour law: Er den økonomiske aktør bekendt med at have tilsidesat sine forpligtelser på det arbejdsretlige\n område? Således som de i forbindelse med dette udbud fremgår af national ret, den\n relevante meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne eller artikel 18, stk. 2, i direktiv\n 2014/24/EU.

Breaching of obligations in the fields of social law: Er den økonomiske aktør bekendt med at have tilsidesat sine forpligtelser på sociallovgivningsområdet?\n Således som de i forbindelse med dette udbud fremgår af national ret, den relevante\n meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne eller artikel 18, stk. 2, i direktiv 2014/24/EU.

Agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition: Har den økonomiske aktør indgået aftaler med andre økonomiske aktører med henblik\n på konkurrencefordrejning?

Grave professional misconduct: Har den økonomiske aktør i forbindelse med udøvelsen af erhvervet gjort sig skyldig\n i alvorlige forsømmelser? Hvis det er relevant, se definitioner i national ret, den\n relevante meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne.

Misrepresentation, withheld information, unable to provide required documents or obtained confidential information of this procedure: Har den økonomiske aktør befundet sig i en af følgende situationer:a) Denne har afgivet\n groft urigtige oplysninger ved meddelelsen af de oplysninger, der kræves til verifikation\n af, at der ikke er grundlag for udelukkelse, eller af at udvælgelseskriterierne er\n opfyldt,b) Denne har tilbageholdt sådanne oplysninger,c) Denne har været ude af stand\n til straks at fremsende den supplerende dokumentation, som en ordregivende myndighed\n eller en ordregivende enhed anmoder om, ogd) Denne har uretmæssigt påvirket den ordregivende\n myndigheds eller den ordregivende enheds beslutningsproces, indhentet fortrolige oplysninger,\n der kan give denne uretmæssige fordele i forbindelse med udbudsproceduren, eller uagtsomt\n givet vildledende oplysninger, der kan have væsentlig indflydelse på beslutninger\n vedrørende udelukkelse, udvælgelse eller tildeling?

Conflict of interest due to its participation in the procurement procedure: Er den økonomiske aktør opmærksom på en interessekonflikt, jf. national ret, den relevante\n meddelelse eller udbudsdokumenterne, som følge af sin deltagelse i udbudsproceduren?

Direct or indirect involvement in the preparation of this procurement procedure: Har den økonomiske aktør eller en virksomhed, der er knyttet til den økonomiske aktør,\n rådgivet den ordregivende myndighed eller den ordregivende enhed eller på anden måde\n været involveret i forberedelsen af udbudsproceduren?

Early termination, damages, or other comparable sanctions: Har den økonomiske aktør væsentligt misligholdt en tidligere offentlig kontrakt, en\n tidligere kontrakt med en ordregivende enhed eller en tidligere koncessionskontrakt,\n hvor misligholdelsen har medført den pågældende kontrakts ophævelse eller en lignende\n sanktion?

Breaching of obligations set under purely national exclusion grounds: Andre udelukkelsesgrunde, der måtte være fastsat i den ordregivende myndigheds eller\n den ordregivende enheds medlemsstats lovgivning. Finder de rent nationale udelukkelsesgrunde,\n der er anført i den relevante meddelelse eller i udbudsdokumenterne, anvendelse?

Breaching obligation relating to payment of social security contributions: Har den økonomiske aktør tilsidesat sine forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af bidrag\n til sociale sikringsordninger både i det land, hvor den økonomiske aktør er etableret,\n og i den ordregivende myndigheds eller den ordregivende enheds medlemsstat, hvis denne\n er en anden end etableringslandet?

Breaching obligation relating to payment of taxes: Har den økonomiske aktør tilsidesat sine forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af skatter\n og afgifter både i det land, hvor den økonomiske aktør er etableret, og i den ordregivende\n myndigheds eller den ordregivende enheds medlemsstat, hvis denne er en anden end etableringslandet?

Business activities are suspended: Er den økonomiske aktørs erhvervsvirksomhed blevet indstillet?

Bankruptcy: Er den økonomiske aktør gået konkurs?

Arrangement with creditors: Er den økonomiske aktør under tvangsakkord uden for konkurs?

Insolvency: Er den økonomiske aktør under insolvens- eller likvidationsbehandling?

Assets being administered by liquidator: Administreres den økonomiske aktørs aktiver af en kurator eller af retten?

Analogous situation like bankruptcy, insolvency or arrangement with creditors under national law: Er den økonomiske aktør i en situation, som svarer til konkurs i henhold til en tilsvarende\n procedure, der er fastsat i national ret?

5 Lot

5.1 Lot: LOT-0000

Title: EU-procurement - Competitive procedure with negotiation – Tender for new thermal oil\n bundles for Renseanlæg Avedøre, Denmark Teknisk afdeling - EU-udbud

Internal identifier: 287746288

5.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract: Supplies

Additional nature of the contract: Services

Main classification (cpv): 42511100 Heat-exchange units

Additional classification (cpv): 42160000 Boiler installations

Additional classification (cpv): 45351000 Mechanical engineering installation works

Additional classification (cpv): 71320000 Engineering design services

Options:

Description of the options: The tender includes the following Options:
-
Shielding of first row of tubes\n in the top bundle, to protect against erosion.
The Options are described in more\n detail in Appendix 4 – Technical Specification for Replacement of Thermal Oil Bundles.

5.1.2 Place of performance

Postal address: Kanalholmen 28

Town: Hvidovre

Postcode: 2650

Country subdivision (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Country: Denmark

Additional information:

5.1.3 Estimated duration

Start date: 10-01-2027

Duration end date: 31-12-2027

5.1.6 General information

Reserved participation: Participation is not reserved.

Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.

The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): no

5.1.7 Strategic procurement

5.1.9 Selection criteria

Sources of selection criteria: code|name|document-used-in-public-procurement.epo-sub-espd

Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:

Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 3

Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 3

The buyer reserves the right to award the contract on the basis of the initial tenders without any further negotiations

5.1.10 Award criteria

Criterion:

Type: Price

Name: Price

Description: Evaluation of the sub-criterion “price”:
The sub-criterion ‘price’ will be assessed\n on the basis of the answers provided by the Tenderer when filling in Appendix 5 –\n Tender List. The evaluation will be based on the Tenderer’s stated prices, exclusive\n of VAT, but inclusive of all other costs.
The total evaluation price is automatically\n added up in Appendix 5 – Tender List.
The evaluation model used for the sub-criterion\n ‘Price’ is described below.
Primary evaluation model
The total evaluation\n prices will be evaluated relatively and based on a linear score model from 0 – 10\n points. The ‘lowest total evaluation price’ among the compliant tenders cf. Prequalification\n and Tender conditions section 7.6, is awarded 10 points. A total evaluation price\n equal to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus X % or above will be awarded 0 points,\n however, subject to the use of the below secondary and tertiary evaluation models\n if the conditions for this have been met.
Other total evaluation prices are awarded\n points based on the following formula:
=( ℎ − )/ ℎ = − ∗ where X is thus set\n at 50 %
If the following secondary or tertiary evaluation model is used, the above\n formula is adjusted accordingly.
The awarded points will be multiplied by the\n weighting of the price sub-criterion in the overall evaluation.
Secondary evaluation\n model
If it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of half or more of\n the compliant tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 50 %,\n X is fixed at 75 %. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation\n price’ plus 75 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points.
Tertiary evaluation model
If\n it is ascertained that the total evaluation price of half or more of the compliant\n tenders is higher than the ‘lowest total evaluation price’ plus 75 %, X is fixed at\n 100 %. A total evaluation price corresponding to the ‘lowest total evaluation price’\n plus 100 % or more will thus be awarded 0 points.

Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)

Award criterion number: 35

Criterion:

Type: Quality

Name: Timeline

Description: Consist of:
o Production time off site - 25 %
o Installation time on site\n - 75 %

- Sub-criterion “Production time off site”

Evaluation of\n the qualitative subfactor ‘production time off site’:
This sub-criterion will\n be evaluated on the basis of the responses provided by the Tenderers in Appendix 6\n – Tender response, where the Tenderers are requested to address the following matters:
•\n A timetable with milestones for the period from contract conclusion until delivery\n on site at the Contracting Authority. Insert concrete dates.
• Clear identification\n of responsibility for the milestones.
• Who is to provide which inputs, information,\n etc. in connection with each individual item.

The Contracting Authority will\n regard it as positive if:
• The timetable is assessed as realistic and robust\n and includes:
o clear indications of responsibility
o which resources of the\n Contracting Authority the Tenderer intends to use, including the expected scope thereof,\n and that such use is proportionate and appropriate
o which information the Contracting\n Authority is to provide, and that such information is proportionate and appropriate
•\n A shorter time period from contract conclusion until delivery on site is better than\n a longer time period.

Points are awarded based on:
• Tenders are evaluated\n in accordance with an absolute model, cf. the points scale in Prequalification and\n Tender Conditions section 8.5.
• The Contracting Authority must make an overall\n assessment of the sub-criterion/each part criterion in the tender.
• The Contracting\n Authority will assess whether the answer appears well documented.
• The Contracting\n Authority will assess the extent to which the Tenderer can render probable the Tenderer’s\n capacity to comply with the items listed, for example supported by experience and\n documentation.

- Sub-criterion “Installation time on site”
Evaluation\n of the qualitative subfactor ‘installation time on site’:
This sub-criterion will\n be evaluated on the basis of the responses provided by the Tenderers in Appendix 6\n – Tender response, where the Tenderers are requested to address the following matters:
•\n A timetable with milestones for the period from delivery on site at the Contracting\n Authority until final takeover of the Plant. Insert number of days, each part of the\n timetable requires
• Clear identification of responsibility for the milestones.
•\n Who is to provide which inputs, information, etc. in connection with each individual\n item.
• Clear identification on which activities incl. time is needed with the\n oven out of service (downtime)

The Contracting Authority will regard it as\n positive if:
• The timetable is assessed as realistic and robust and includes:
o\n clear indications of responsibility
o which resources of the Contracting Authority\n the Tenderer intends to use, including the expected scope thereof, and that such use\n is proportionate and appropriate
o which information the Contracting Authority\n is to provide, and that such information is proportionate and appropriate
• A\n shorter time period from delivery on site until final takeover of the Plant is better\n than a longer time period.
• A shorter time period where the oven is out of service\n (downtime).
o It is better to have a longer time in total with a shorter time\n when the oven is out of service (downtime).

Points are awarded based on:
•\n Tenders are evaluated in accordance with an absolute model, cf. the points scale in\n Prequalification and Tender Conditions section 8.5.
• The Contracting Authority\n must make an overall assessment of the sub-criterion/each part criterion in the tender.
•\n The Contracting Authority will assess whether the answer appears well documented.
•\n The Contracting Authority will assess the extent to which the Tenderer can render\n probable the Tenderer’s capacity to comply with the items listed, for example supported\n by experience and documentation.

Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)

Award criterion number: 40

Criterion:

Type: Quality

Name: Method statement for installation and dismantling

Description: Evaluation of the qualitative subfactor ‘method statement for installation and dismantling’:
This\n sub-criterion will be evaluated on the basis of the responses provided by the Tenderers\n in Appendix 6 – Tender response, where the Tenderers are requested to address the\n following matters:
• Describe the proposed methodology for dismantling, removal\n and disposal of the existing thermal oil bundles, including lifting operations, waste\n management and environmental considerations.
• Describe the proposed methodology\n for fabrication, delivery, installation and commissioning of the new thermal oil bundles,\n including quality assurance and testing activities.
• Describe the Tenderer's\n health, safety and environmental (HSE) management approach for carrying out the works

The\n Contracting Authority will regard it as positive if:
• The proposed methodology\n is detailed, realistic and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the technical\n and practical challenges associated with the assignment.
• The proposed methodology\n includes well-documented measures to ensure a safe execution of the works and minimize\n risks to personnel, facilities and the environment.
• The Tenderer demonstrates\n a robust quality management approach, including inspection, testing and documentation\n procedures for the manufactured bundles.
• The Tenderer demonstrates an effective\n approach to planning and execution that minimizes downtime and ensures timely completion\n of the works.

The Tenderer supports the proposed methodology with relevant\n references, lessons learned from similar projects and clear evidence of previous experience.
Points\n are awarded based on:
• Tenders are evaluated in accordance with an absolute model,\n cf. the points scale in Prequalification and Tender Conditions section 8.5.
•\n The Contracting Authority must make an overall assessment of the sub-criterion/each\n part criterion in the tender.
• The Contracting Authority will assess whether\n the methodology is specific, coherent and sufficiently documented.
• The Contracting\n Authority will assess the extent to which the Tenderer can render probable the Tenderer’s\n capacity to comply with the items listed, for example supported by experience and\n documentation.
• The item concerning the project execution plan and measures to\n minimize downtime weighs more heavily than the other items.

Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)

Award criterion number: 25

5.1.11 Procurement documents

Languages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English

Deadline for requesting additional information: 11-08-2026 21:55 +00:00

Address of the procurement documents: https://permalink.mercell.com/287746288.aspx

5.1.12 Terms of procurement

Terms of the procedure:

Estimated date of dispatch of the invitations to submit tenders: 28-08-2026

Terms of submission:

Electronic submission: Required

Address for submission: https://permalink.mercell.com/287746288.aspx

Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English

Electronic catalogue: Not allowed

Variants: Not allowed

Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed

Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 18-08-2026 10:00 +00:00

Terms of contract:

The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No

Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The contract contains social clauses and labour clauses.

Electronic invoicing: Required

Electronic ordering will be used: no

Electronic payment will be used: yes

5.1.15 Techniques

Framework agreement:

No framework agreement

Information about the dynamic purchasing system:

No dynamic purchase system

5.1.16 Further information, mediation and review

Review organisation: Klagenævnet for Udbud - Nævnenes Hus

Information about review deadlines: I henhold til LBK nr. 448 af 8.5.2024 om Klagenævnet for Udbud (med senere ændringer)\n gælder følgende frister for indgivelse af klage:

Klage over udbud\n eller beslutninger omfattet af udbudslovens afsnit II eller III eller forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet,\n som ikke er omfattet af særlige bestemmelser om prækvalifikation, skal være indgivet\n til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden:

45 kalenderdage efter, at ordregiveren har\n offentliggjort en bekendtgørelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende om, at ordregiveren\n har indgået en kontrakt. Fristen regnes fra dagen efter den dag, hvor bekendtgørelsen\n er blevet offentliggjort.

Klage over indgåelse af en kontrakt\n baseret på en rammeaftale med genåbning af konkurrencen eller et dynamisk indkøbssystem\n omfattet af udbudslovens afsnit II eller III eller forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet\n skal være indgivet til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden;

30 kalenderdage regnet\n fra dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har underrettet de berørte tilbudsgivere\n om, at kontrakten er indgået, forudsat at underretningen har indeholdt en begrundelse\n for beslutningen.

Klage over indgåelse af rammeaftaler efter udbudslovens\n afsnit II, III og §§ 191 og 192, efter tilbudsloven eller forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet\n skal være indgivet til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden:

6 måneder regnet fra\n dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har underrettet de berørte ansøgere og tilbudsgivere\n om tildelingsbeslutningen. naevneneshus.dk

Klage over en ordregivers\n beslutning om at videreføre en kontrakt, jf. udbudslovens § 185, stk. 2, skal være\n indgivet til Klagenævnet for Udbud inden:

20 kalenderdage regnet fra dagen\n efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren har meddelt sin beslutning.

Har\n en ordregiver fulgt proceduren i lovens § 4 for at sikre, at en kontrakt ikke erklæres\n for uden virkning, skal en klage over, at ordregiveren i strid med udbudsdirektivet\n eller forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivet har indgået en kontrakt uden forudgående offentliggørelse\n af en udbudsbekendtgørelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende, være indgivet til Klagenævnet\n for Udbud inden

30 kalenderdage regnet fra dagen efter den dag, hvor ordregiveren\n har offentliggjort en sådan bekendtgørelse, forudsat at bekendtgørelsen med henblik\n på frivillig forudgående gennemsigtighed indeholder begrundelsen for ordregiverens\n beslutning.

Senest samtidig med, at en klage indgives til Klagenævnet\n for Udbud, skal klageren skriftligt underrette ordregiveren om, at klage indgives\n til Klagenævnet for Udbud, og om, hvorvidt klagen er indgivet i standstill-perioden\n efter lovens § 3, stk. 1 eller 2, eller i den periode på 10 kalenderdage, som er fastsat\n i § 4, stk. 1, nr. 2. Hvis klagen ikke er indgivet i disse perioder, skal klageren\n tillige angive, om der begæres opsættende virkning, jf. lovens § 12, stk. 1.

Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

Organisation receiving requests to participate: BIOFOS A/S

Organisation processing tenders: BIOFOS A/S