5 Delkontrakt

5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0000

Titel: Qualification Scheme for Climate credits

Beskrivelse: The Qualification Scheme concerns the supply of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) credits\n from nature-based, hybrid and engineered CDR solutions including, but not limited\n to, reforestation, blue carbon, biochar, bioenergy with carbon dioxide capture and\n storage (BECCS) and direct air carbon dioxide capture and storage (DACCS) for the\n purpose of offsetting Copenhagen Airports’ residual scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 category\n 6 (business travel) emissions in line with applicable Airport Carbon Accreditation\n carbon offsetting requirements.

Intern ID: Qualification Scheme CC

5.1.1 Formål

Kontraktens hovedformål: Tjenesteydelser

Primær klassifikation (cpv): 90731210 Køb af CO2-emissionstilgodehavender

5.1.2 Udførelsessted

Hvor som helst

Yderligere oplysninger:

5.1.3 Anslået varighed

Varighed: 8 År

5.1.4 Fornyelse

Højeste antal fornyelser: 0

5.1.6 Generelle oplysninger

Reserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.

Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja

5.1.9 Udvælgelseskriterier

Kilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse

Kriterium: Referencer på specificerede leverancer

Beskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The applicant must meet the following minimum requirements in order to be technically\n and professionally fit to
perform the contract

The applicant must have\n made at least 3 deliveries of goods or services that have been performed within the\n last
3 years and that are similar to the subject matter of the contract.
The\n references must have been carried out within the last three years from the date on\n which the application was
submitted.
The reference requirement can be met\n through references where the applicant has been a supplier or
subcontractor.\n The decisive factor is that the applicant has performed the work covered by the
reference.\n NOTE. The applicant is permitted to use previous work performed for CPH as a reference,\n but it is up
to the applicant to assess whether this reference is most comparable\n to the assignment offered.
Please note that an applicant can only provide its\n own references in its own ESPD, i.e. for the legal entity in
question (e.g. company).\n This means, for example, that the references of group companies can only be taken\n into
account if the applicant relies on the group companies in question in relation\n to suitability, and if a separate ESPD
and statement of support are thus submitted\n for the group companies in question, cf. below.
For consortia, the consortium\n participants must collectively meet the minimum requirement. For applicants who
rely\n on the technical and professional capacities of other economic operators, the applicant\n and the supporting
entity must jointly meet the minimum requirement.
Indication\n of reference and formal requirements for the content of the reference
The application\n may contain a maximum of 3 references. It is the responsibility of the Applicant to\n select the
references that are considered most comparable to the tendered assignment.\n If more than 3 references are
submitted, only the first specified 3 references\n will be used as a basis for CPH's assessment of the Application.
The applicant's\n references as specified in the eESPD should include the following for the purposes\n of the
suitability assessment and selection assessment:
• The reference customer,\n incl. Contact information
• Contract period and time of delivery and commissioning
•\n Description of the reference customer
• Description of how the reference is similar\n to the subject matter of the contract
• Scope of delivery
• Description of\n the services provided
• The applicant's role in connection with the delivery
CPH\n reserves the right to contact the specified reference customer in order to obtain\n certification of the
information about the reference.

CPH encourages\n the applicant's reference to be described comprehensively but concisely and not exceeding\n
2400 characters with spaces corresponding to one (1) A4 page.
Similarity\n to the subject-matter of the contract
In order to assess whether the references\n cited are comparable to the subject-matter of the contract tendered,
emphasis\n is placed on the following:
In assessing whether the references submitted by The\n Applicant are comparable to the subject matter of this
qualification system,\n CPH will consider whether the referenced deliveries demonstrate technical and operational\n
characteristics that align with the requirements for supplying ACA-eligible CDR\n credits. Particular emphasis will
be placed on the following aspects of similarity:
1.\n Delivery of CDR credits that meet the requirements laid out in Section 3.2 of Annex\n D - ACA Carbon
Offsetting Requirements (eligible crediting programs, carbon removal\n methodologies and project types)
2. Provision of documentation enabling ACA-mandated\n public reporting, including information concerning
crediting programs, project\n description, volume, vintage, and retirement details, as laid out in Section
4.1.1\n of the Annex D - ACA Carbon Offsetting Requirements
3. Whether the referenced\n delivery involves comparable volumes to those expected under this qualification
system.\n
References demonstrating these characteristics will be considered highly similar\n to the subject matter of the
qualification system.
The applicant has the\n option of attaching a supplement to the answer that cannot be contained in the ESPD,\n e.g.
in the form of pictures and illustrations, etc.

5.1.11 Tilbudsdokumenter

Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=455550&TID=200416231&B=

5.1.12 Tilbudsvilkår

Vilkår for indgivelse:

Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet

Indgivelsesadresse: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=455550&TID=200416231&B=

Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk

Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 07-06-2034 22:00 +00:00

Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:

Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej

Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet

Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: ja

Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja

5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgang

Organisation med ansvar for mægling: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

Organisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for Udbud

Oplysninger om klagefrister: A complaint regarding non-selection for prequalification must be lodged with the Danish\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days from the day after\n the dispatch of a notification to the applicants concerned stating which applicants\n have been selected, cf. section 171(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section\n 2(1), no. 1, of the Danish Complaints Board Act, where such notification is accompanied\n by a statement of reasons for the decision.

In other situations, a complaint\n concerning the procurement procedure must be lodged with the Danish Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within:

1) 45 calendar days after the contracting\n authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European\n Union stating that the contracting authority has entered into a contract. The time\n limit shall be calculated from the day following the date of publication of the notice.

2)\n 30 calendar days from the day following the date on which the contracting authority\n has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into,\n provided that the notification included a statement of reasons for the decision.

3)\n six months after the contracting authority has entered into a framework agreement,\n calculated from the day following the date on which the contracting authority notified\n the applicants and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of the Danish Complaints\n Board Act or section 171(4) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

4) 20 calendar\n days from the day following the date on which the contracting authority has communicated\n its decision, cf. section 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

No\n later than simultaneously with the lodging of a complaint with the Danish Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, the complainant must notify the contracting authority\n in writing that a complaint has been lodged with the Danish Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement and whether the complaint was lodged during the standstill period, cf.\n section 6(4) of the Danish Complaints Board Act.

In cases where the complaint\n was not lodged during the standstill period, the complainant must also state whether\n a request is made for the complaint to have suspensive effect, cf. section 12(1) of\n the Danish Complaints Board Act.

Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Københavns Lufthavne A/S

Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

5 Lot

5.1 Lot: LOT-0000

Title: Qualification Scheme for Climate credits

Description: The Qualification Scheme concerns the supply of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) credits\n from nature-based, hybrid and engineered CDR solutions including, but not limited\n to, reforestation, blue carbon, biochar, bioenergy with carbon dioxide capture and\n storage (BECCS) and direct air carbon dioxide capture and storage (DACCS) for the\n purpose of offsetting Copenhagen Airports’ residual scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 category\n 6 (business travel) emissions in line with applicable Airport Carbon Accreditation\n carbon offsetting requirements.

Internal identifier: Qualification Scheme CC

5.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract: Services

Main classification (cpv): 90731210 Purchase of CO2 emission credits

5.1.2 Place of performance

Anywhere

Additional information:

5.1.3 Estimated duration

Duration: 8 Year

5.1.4 Renewal

Maximum renewals: 0

5.1.6 General information

Reserved participation: Participation is not reserved.

The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes

5.1.9 Selection criteria

Sources of selection criteria: Notice

Criterion: References on specified deliveries

Description of selection criterion: The applicant must meet the following minimum requirements in order to be technically\n and professionally fit to
perform the contract

The applicant must have\n made at least 3 deliveries of goods or services that have been performed within the\n last
3 years and that are similar to the subject matter of the contract.
The\n references must have been carried out within the last three years from the date on\n which the application was
submitted.
The reference requirement can be met\n through references where the applicant has been a supplier or
subcontractor.\n The decisive factor is that the applicant has performed the work covered by the
reference.\n NOTE. The applicant is permitted to use previous work performed for CPH as a reference,\n but it is up
to the applicant to assess whether this reference is most comparable\n to the assignment offered.
Please note that an applicant can only provide its\n own references in its own ESPD, i.e. for the legal entity in
question (e.g. company).\n This means, for example, that the references of group companies can only be taken\n into
account if the applicant relies on the group companies in question in relation\n to suitability, and if a separate ESPD
and statement of support are thus submitted\n for the group companies in question, cf. below.
For consortia, the consortium\n participants must collectively meet the minimum requirement. For applicants who
rely\n on the technical and professional capacities of other economic operators, the applicant\n and the supporting
entity must jointly meet the minimum requirement.
Indication\n of reference and formal requirements for the content of the reference
The application\n may contain a maximum of 3 references. It is the responsibility of the Applicant to\n select the
references that are considered most comparable to the tendered assignment.\n If more than 3 references are
submitted, only the first specified 3 references\n will be used as a basis for CPH's assessment of the Application.
The applicant's\n references as specified in the eESPD should include the following for the purposes\n of the
suitability assessment and selection assessment:
• The reference customer,\n incl. Contact information
• Contract period and time of delivery and commissioning
•\n Description of the reference customer
• Description of how the reference is similar\n to the subject matter of the contract
• Scope of delivery
• Description of\n the services provided
• The applicant's role in connection with the delivery
CPH\n reserves the right to contact the specified reference customer in order to obtain\n certification of the
information about the reference.

CPH encourages\n the applicant's reference to be described comprehensively but concisely and not exceeding\n
2400 characters with spaces corresponding to one (1) A4 page.
Similarity\n to the subject-matter of the contract
In order to assess whether the references\n cited are comparable to the subject-matter of the contract tendered,
emphasis\n is placed on the following:
In assessing whether the references submitted by The\n Applicant are comparable to the subject matter of this
qualification system,\n CPH will consider whether the referenced deliveries demonstrate technical and operational\n
characteristics that align with the requirements for supplying ACA-eligible CDR\n credits. Particular emphasis will
be placed on the following aspects of similarity:
1.\n Delivery of CDR credits that meet the requirements laid out in Section 3.2 of Annex\n D - ACA Carbon
Offsetting Requirements (eligible crediting programs, carbon removal\n methodologies and project types)
2. Provision of documentation enabling ACA-mandated\n public reporting, including information concerning
crediting programs, project\n description, volume, vintage, and retirement details, as laid out in Section
4.1.1\n of the Annex D - ACA Carbon Offsetting Requirements
3. Whether the referenced\n delivery involves comparable volumes to those expected under this qualification
system.\n
References demonstrating these characteristics will be considered highly similar\n to the subject matter of the
qualification system.
The applicant has the\n option of attaching a supplement to the answer that cannot be contained in the ESPD,\n e.g.
in the form of pictures and illustrations, etc.

5.1.11 Procurement documents

Address of the procurement documents: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=455550&TID=200416231&B=

5.1.12 Terms of procurement

Terms of submission:

Electronic submission: Required

Address for submission: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=455550&TID=200416231&B=

Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English

Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 07-06-2034 22:00 +00:00

Terms of contract:

The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No

Electronic invoicing: Required

Electronic ordering will be used: yes

Electronic payment will be used: yes

5.1.16 Further information, mediation and review

Mediation organisation: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

Review organisation: Klagenævnet for Udbud

Information about review deadlines: A complaint regarding non-selection for prequalification must be lodged with the Danish\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days from the day after\n the dispatch of a notification to the applicants concerned stating which applicants\n have been selected, cf. section 171(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section\n 2(1), no. 1, of the Danish Complaints Board Act, where such notification is accompanied\n by a statement of reasons for the decision.

In other situations, a complaint\n concerning the procurement procedure must be lodged with the Danish Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within:

1) 45 calendar days after the contracting\n authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European\n Union stating that the contracting authority has entered into a contract. The time\n limit shall be calculated from the day following the date of publication of the notice.

2)\n 30 calendar days from the day following the date on which the contracting authority\n has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into,\n provided that the notification included a statement of reasons for the decision.

3)\n six months after the contracting authority has entered into a framework agreement,\n calculated from the day following the date on which the contracting authority notified\n the applicants and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of the Danish Complaints\n Board Act or section 171(4) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

4) 20 calendar\n days from the day following the date on which the contracting authority has communicated\n its decision, cf. section 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.

No\n later than simultaneously with the lodging of a complaint with the Danish Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, the complainant must notify the contracting authority\n in writing that a complaint has been lodged with the Danish Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement and whether the complaint was lodged during the standstill period, cf.\n section 6(4) of the Danish Complaints Board Act.

In cases where the complaint\n was not lodged during the standstill period, the complainant must also state whether\n a request is made for the complaint to have suspensive effect, cf. section 12(1) of\n the Danish Complaints Board Act.

Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Københavns Lufthavne A/S

Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

8 Organisations

8.1 ORG-0001

Official name: Københavns Lufthavne A/S

Registration number: 14707204

Postal address: Lufthavnsboulevarden 6

Town: Kastrup

Postcode: 2770

Country subdivision (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Country: Denmark

Contact point: Gustav Hyrup

Email: gustav.soerensen@cph.dk

Telephone: +45 53718650

Buyer profile: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/company/companyinformation/index/564760

Roles of this organisation:

Buyer

Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure

8.1 ORG-0002

Official name: Klagenævnet for Udbud

Registration number: 37795526

Postal address: Nævnenes Hus, Toldboden 2

Town: Viborg

Postcode: 8800

Country subdivision (NUTS): Vestjylland (DK041)

Country: Denmark

Email: klfu@naevneneshus.dk

Telephone: +45 72405600

Internet address: https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/

Roles of this organisation:

Review organisation

8.1 ORG-0003

Official name: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

Registration number: 10294819

Postal address: Carl Jacobsens Vej 35

Town: Valby

Postcode: 2500

Country subdivision (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)

Country: Denmark

Email: kfst@kfst.dk

Telephone: +45 41715000

Internet address: https://kfst.dk/

Roles of this organisation:

Organisation providing more information on the review procedures

Mediation organisation

8.1 ORG-0004

Official name: Mercell Holding ASA

Registration number: 980921565

Postal address: Askekroken 11

Town: Oslo

Postcode: 0277

Country subdivision (NUTS): Oslo (NO081)

Country: Norway

Contact point: eSender

Email: publication@mercell.com

Telephone: +47 21018800

Fax: +47 21018801

Internet address: http://mercell.com/

Roles of this organisation:

TED eSender