{"bekendtgoerelseNoegle":{"noticeId":{"value":"c6349004-4949-4b21-87bc-86a9ca9875c2"},"noticeVersion":{"value":"01"},"noticePublicationNumber":{"value":"00301627-2025"}},"htmlDA":"\n\n \n 1 Køber1.1 KøberOfficielt navn: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Den ordregivende enheds aktiviteter: Elektricitetsrelaterede aktiviteter\n \n \n 2 Procedure2.1 ProcedureTitel: NEA and SLF02 – Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems\n Beskrivelse: The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV\n single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated\n land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The\n deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02.\n The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender\n documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender\n documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also\n accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is\n offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support\n of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc.\n no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all\n three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent\n tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant\n applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for\n all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible\n to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is\n evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded\n more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement\n for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is\n divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount\n to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value:\n EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail\n concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n Identifikator for proceduren: b78bc229-3d81-4a61-9768-07bd447b5fba\n Intern identifikator: 24/13859\n Udbudsprocedure: Udbud med forhandling/indkaldelse af tilbud med forudgående offentliggørelse\n Hovedpunkterne i proceduren: The tender is an EU Tender with negotiations. The tenders must be valid for a period\n of 6 months from the specified time limit for submission\n 2.1.1 Formål\n Primær klassificering (cpv): 31321300 Højspændingskabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31300000 Isolerede ledninger og kabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31320000 Stærkstrømskabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31340000 Kabeltilbehør, isoleret\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31343000 Kabelsamlinger, isolerede\n \n 2.1.2 Udførelsessted\n Hvor som helst i det pågældende land\n Yderligere oplysninger: East Jutland – South Zealand - Denmark\n \n 2.1.3 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 113.300.000 Euro\n \n 2.1.4 Generelle oplysningerYderligere oplysninger: It should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required.\n If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be\n filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must\n be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via \"My answer\". Guidelines\n for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen,\n www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of\n the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but\n relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister\n company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the\n tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely,\n with a completed Part II \"Information on the economic operator\" and Part III \"Grounds\n for exclusion\" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV \"Selection criteria\".\n The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In\n addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of\n the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement\n of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations,\n partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating\n economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must\n also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be\n a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally,\n and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.\n \n \n \n 2.1.6 Grunde til udelukkelseKorruption: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction\n rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly\n in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention\n on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or\n officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in\n Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating\n corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground\n also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority\n (contracting entity) or the economic operator\n Deltagelse i en kriminel organisation: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a\n criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which\n an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?\n As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008\n on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).\n Hvidvaskning af penge eller finansiering af terrorisme: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or\n terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which\n an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?\n As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of\n the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system\n for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005,\n p. 15).\n Svig: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction\n rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly\n in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the\n Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ\n C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).\n Børnearbejde og andre former for menneskehandel: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other\n forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years\n ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to\n be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament\n and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human\n beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA\n (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).\n Har afgivet urigtige oplysninger eller tilbageholdt oplysninger, som ikke var i stand til at fremlægge de krævede dokumenter og indhentet fortrolige oplysninger i forbindelse med denne procedure: Can the economic operator confirm that:a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation\n in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds\n for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,b) It has withheld such\n information,c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents\n required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, andd) It has undertaken\n to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting\n entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages\n in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that\n may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?\n Rent nationale udelukkelsesgrunde: Other exclusion grounds that may be foreseen in the national legislation of the contracting\n authority's or contracting entity's Member State. Has the economic operator breached\n its obligations relating to the purely national grounds of exclusion, which are specified\n in the relevant notice or in the procurement documents?\n Interessekonflikt som følge af deltagelse i udbudsproceduren: Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national\n law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in\n the procurement procedure?\n Direkte eller indirekte involvering i forberedelsen af denne udbudsprocedure: Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting\n authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the\n procurement procedure?\n Skyldig i alvorlige forsømmelser i forbindelse med udøvelsen af erhvervet: Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable,\n see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.\n Betaling af socialsikringsbidrag: Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social\n security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member\n State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country\n of establishment?\n Betaling af skatter og afgifter: Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes,\n both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting\n authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?\n Terrorhandlinger eller strafbare handlinger med forbindelse til terroraktivitet: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences\n or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five\n years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues\n to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of\n 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground\n also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as\n referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.\n \n \n \n 5 Delkontrakt5.1 Teknisk ID for partiet: LOT-0001Titel: Lot 1 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems\n Beskrivelse: The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV\n single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated\n land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The\n deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02.\n The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender\n documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender\n documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also\n accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is\n offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support\n of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc.\n no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all\n three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent\n tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant\n applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for\n all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible\n to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is\n evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded\n more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement\n for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is\n divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount\n to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value:\n EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail\n concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n Intern identifikator: 24/13859 - Lot 1\n 5.1.1 Formål\n Primær klassificering (cpv): 31321300 Højspændingskabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31300000 Isolerede ledninger og kabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31320000 Stærkstrømskabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31340000 Kabeltilbehør, isoleret\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31343000 Kabelsamlinger, isolerede\n Valgmuligheder:Beskrivelse af optioner: N/A\n \n \n 5.1.2 Udførelsessted\n Hvor som helst i det pågældende land\n Yderligere oplysninger: East Jutland - Denmark\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n Varigheds slutdato: 21-10-2032\n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 42.550.000 Euro\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: It should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required.\n If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be\n filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must\n be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via \"My answer\". Guidelines\n for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen,\n www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of\n the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but\n relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister\n company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the\n tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely,\n with a completed Part II \"Information on the economic operator\" and Part III \"Grounds\n for exclusion\" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV \"Selection criteria\".\n The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In\n addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of\n the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement\n of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations,\n partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating\n economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must\n also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be\n a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally,\n and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKriterium:Type: Økonomisk og finansiel formåen\n Navn: Economic and financial standing\n Beskrivelse: The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information\n from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity\n (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2.\n Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the\n applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of\n economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a\n separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant\n to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the\n applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a\n group of economic operators.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:Type: Økonomisk og finansiel formåen\n Navn: Economic and financial standing - minimum requirements\n Beskrivelse: LOT 1 – NEA - Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification,\n be at least EUR 14,200,000.00 Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at\n the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15\n pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds 42,550,000.00. Please\n notet that the minimum requirementy will be aggregatet for each lot a tenderer is\n awarded. This meens that tf a tenderer is prequalified to submit tenders for all three\n lots, and at the award stage is evaluated economically most advantageous for all three\n lots, the minimum requirement for the three lots are aggregated. Consequently, a tenderer\n to be awarded all three lots must have an equity amounting to min. 37,500,000.00 –\n EUR, and an equity ratio at 20pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct.\n the equity must be min. 113,300,000.00 - EUR.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:\n Navn: Selection of applicants\n Beskrivelse: If more than 5 applicants fulfill the minimum requirements, cf. section 2.2.1, the\n Contracting Authority will prequalify the 3-5 applicants who are evaluated as most\n suitable for the tendered contract. The selection of the most suitable applicants\n will be based on the applicant’s references c.f. section 2.2.2. The assessment of\n the references will be based on to which extent the references demonstrate extensive\n experience with deliveries comparable to the tendered assignment cf. Section 1.4 regarding\n solution, complexity, scope and purpose, especially concerning: • Voltage level •\n Length of cable route • Delivery lengths • Tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication,\n factory testing, supply, transport, construction (civil works not included), installation\n (joints, AIS – terminations, link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning\n and taking-over testing of the entire supply and its systems and functions) • Type-test,\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Contract value\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:Type: Egnethed til at udøve det pågældende erhverv\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Ikke anvendt\n \n Kriterium:Type: Teknisk og faglig formåen\n Navn: Technical and professional ability\n Beskrivelse: The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and\n financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The\n ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C.\n For each lot the applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 (three) most comparable and\n relevant references undertaken in the past 5 (five) years as part of the application.\n By \"undertaken in the past 5 years” implies that the reference must not have been\n completed prior to the date reached when counting 5 years backwards from the submission\n date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration.\n References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the\n application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been\n delivered, and this may affect the assessment of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. Further,\n if references are obtained in collaboration with other parties, the applicant should\n clearly explain which elements have been carried out by the applicant. The references\n should describe a 220 kV (or above) underground cable systems, and include: • A specific\n description of deliveries, including: • Voltage level, length of cable route, maximum\n delivery lengths and tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication, factory testing, supply,\n transport, construction (civil works not included), installation (joints and AIS-terminations,\n link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning and taking-over testing of the\n entire supply and its systems and functions). • Description of type-test (if performed),\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Information about contact data (name, email and phone number) for references • Contract\n value (if possible) • Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any\n ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the assessment.\n Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is\n visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying\n on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators\n the maximum number of references must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when\n combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the\n most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet\n finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities\n capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD\n part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 1\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive afvist\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender\n Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 55\n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer\n who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements\n will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality\n of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values,\n and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system\n is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness\n of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored.\n In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of\n having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of\n water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The\n quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation.\n It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide\n evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum\n allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and\n after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger\n bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller\n pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively.\n 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires\n (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively.\n 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting\n layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance:\n Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality\n of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated\n positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively.\n 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher\n current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of\n this sub-criterion\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 15\n \n Kriterium:\n Navn: Programme, organization and manpower\n Beskrivelse: The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned,\n realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential\n contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery\n within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that:\n 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded,\n programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for\n actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme\n contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning\n for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site\n and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability\n to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation\n phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark,\n with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further,\n interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent\n personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also\n covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall\n evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 20\n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms.\n Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part\n of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit\n and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion\n \"Contract terms\" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to\n the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this\n regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and\n shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance\n in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If\n the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in\n the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 10\n \n \n 5.1.11 UdbudsdokumenterAdresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n \n 5.1.12 UdbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Avanceret eller kvalificeret elektronisk signatur eller segl (jf forordning (EU) nr 910/2014) er påkrævet\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Beskrivelse af den finansielle garanti: Please see description in tender conditions.\n Frist for modtagelse af interessetilkendegivelser: 30-05-2025 10:00 +00:00\n \n Oplysninger, der kan suppleres efter indgivelsesfristen er udløbet:Køberen kan beslutte, at visse manglende tilbudsrelaterede dokumenter kan indsendes senere.\n Yderligere oplysninger: -\n \n Betingelser for kontrakten:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: See template for contract\n Der kræves en fortrolighedsaftale: nej\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: ja\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Finansiel ordning: See the tender materiel. The tenderer's legal form is not required. If applications\n and tenders are submitted by a consortium, all participants in the consortium must\n be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract and a consortium\n member must be appointed with whom a binding agreement can be concluded on behalf\n of the consortium.\n \n Oplysninger om undersøgelsesfrister: Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints\n must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar\n days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the\n Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication\n date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed\n the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based\n on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons\n for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has\n sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority\n has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included\n a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.\n \n 5.1.15 Teknikker\n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der sikrer adgang til udbudsdokumenterne offline: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Organisation, der modtager ansøgninger om deltagelse: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der behandler tilbud: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA\n \n \n 5.1 Teknisk ID for partiet: LOT-0002Titel: Lot 2 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems\n Beskrivelse: The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV\n single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated\n land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The\n deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02.\n The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender\n documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender\n documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also\n accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is\n offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support\n of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc.\n no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all\n three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent\n tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant\n applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for\n all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible\n to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is\n evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded\n more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement\n for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is\n divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount\n to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value:\n EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail\n concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n Intern identifikator: 24/13859 - Lot 2\n 5.1.1 Formål\n Primær klassificering (cpv): 31321300 Højspændingskabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31300000 Isolerede ledninger og kabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31320000 Stærkstrømskabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31340000 Kabeltilbehør, isoleret\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31343000 Kabelsamlinger, isolerede\n Valgmuligheder:Beskrivelse af optioner: N/A\n \n \n 5.1.2 Udførelsessted\n Hvor som helst i det pågældende land\n Yderligere oplysninger: East Jutland\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n Varigheds slutdato: 15-01-2032\n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 42.550.000 Euro\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: It should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required.\n If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be\n filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must\n be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via \"My answer\". Guidelines\n for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen,\n www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of\n the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but\n relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister\n company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the\n tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely,\n with a completed Part II \"Information on the economic operator\" and Part III \"Grounds\n for exclusion\" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV \"Selection criteria\".\n The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In\n addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of\n the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement\n of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations,\n partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating\n economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must\n also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be\n a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally,\n and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKriterium:Type: Økonomisk og finansiel formåen\n Navn: Economic and financial standing\n Beskrivelse: The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information\n from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity\n (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2.\n Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the\n applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of\n economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a\n separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant\n to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the\n applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a\n group of economic operators.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:Type: Økonomisk og finansiel formåen\n Navn: Economic and financial standing - minimum requirements\n Beskrivelse: LOT 2 – NEA Equity from the latest annual report, at the time of prequalification,\n be at least EUR 14,200,000.00 Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at\n the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15\n pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds 42,550,000.00. Please\n notet that the minimum requirementy will be aggregatet for each lot a tenderer is\n awarded. This meens that tf a tenderer is prequalified to submit tenders for all three\n lots, and at the award stage is evaluated economically most advantageous for all three\n lots, the minimum requirement for the three lots are aggregated. Consequently, a tenderer\n to be awarded all three lots must have an equity amounting to min. 37,500,000.00 –\n EUR, and an equity ratio at 20pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct.\n the equity must be min. 113,300,000.00 - EUR.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:\n Navn: Selection of applicants\n Beskrivelse: If more than 5 applicants fulfill the minimum requirements, cf. section 2.2.1, the\n Contracting Authority will prequalify the 3-5 applicants who are evaluated as most\n suitable for the tendered contract. The selection of the most suitable applicants\n will be based on the applicant’s references c.f. section 2.2.2. The assessment of\n the references will be based on to which extent the references demonstrate extensive\n experience with deliveries comparable to the tendered assignment cf. Section 1.4 regarding\n solution, complexity, scope and purpose, especially concerning: • Voltage level •\n Length of cable route • Delivery lengths • Tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication,\n factory testing, supply, transport, construction (civil works not included), installation\n (joints, AIS – terminations, link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning\n and taking-over testing of the entire supply and its systems and functions) • Type-test,\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Contract value\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:Type: Egnethed til at udøve det pågældende erhverv\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Ikke anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:Type: Teknisk og faglig formåen\n Navn: Technical and professional ability\n Beskrivelse: The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and\n financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The\n ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C.\n For each lot the applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 (three) most comparable and\n relevant references undertaken in the past 5 (five) years as part of the application.\n By \"undertaken in the past 5 years” implies that the reference must not have been\n completed prior to the date reached when counting 5 years backwards from the submission\n date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration.\n References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the\n application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been\n delivered, and this may affect the assessment of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. Further,\n if references are obtained in collaboration with other parties, the applicant should\n clearly explain which elements have been carried out by the applicant. The references\n should describe a 220 kV (or above) underground cable systems, and include: • A specific\n description of deliveries, including: • Voltage level, length of cable route, maximum\n delivery lengths and tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication, factory testing, supply,\n transport, construction (civil works not included), installation (joints and AIS-terminations,\n link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning and taking-over testing of the\n entire supply and its systems and functions). • Description of type-test (if performed),\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Information about contact data (name, email and phone number) for references • Contract\n value (if possible) • Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any\n ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the assessment.\n Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is\n visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying\n on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators\n the maximum number of references must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when\n combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the\n most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet\n finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities\n capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD\n part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 1\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive afvist\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender\n Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 55\n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer\n who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements\n will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality\n of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values,\n and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system\n is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness\n of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored.\n In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of\n having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of\n water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The\n quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation.\n It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide\n evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum\n allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and\n after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger\n bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller\n pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively.\n 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires\n (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively.\n 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting\n layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance:\n Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality\n of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated\n positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively.\n 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher\n current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of\n this sub-criterion\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 15\n \n Kriterium:\n Navn: Programme, organization and manpower\n Beskrivelse: The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned,\n realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential\n contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery\n within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that:\n 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded,\n programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for\n actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme\n contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning\n for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site\n and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability\n to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation\n phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark,\n with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further,\n interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent\n personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also\n covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall\n evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 20\n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms.\n Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part\n of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit\n and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion\n \"Contract terms\" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to\n the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this\n regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and\n shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance\n in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If\n the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in\n the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 10\n \n \n 5.1.11 UdbudsdokumenterAdresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n \n 5.1.12 UdbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Beskrivelse af den finansielle garanti: Please see description in tender conditions.\n Frist for modtagelse af interessetilkendegivelser: 30-05-2025 10:00 +00:00\n \n Oplysninger, der kan suppleres efter indgivelsesfristen er udløbet:Køberen kan beslutte, at visse manglende tilbudsrelaterede dokumenter kan indsendes senere.\n Yderligere oplysninger: -\n \n Betingelser for kontrakten:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: See template for contract\n Der kræves en fortrolighedsaftale: nej\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: ja\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Finansiel ordning: See the tender materiel. The tenderer's legal form is not required. If applications\n and tenders are submitted by a consortium, all participants in the consortium must\n be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract and a consortium\n member must be appointed with whom a binding agreement can be concluded on behalf\n of the consortium.\n \n Oplysninger om undersøgelsesfrister: Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints\n must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar\n days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the\n Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication\n date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed\n the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based\n on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons\n for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has\n sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority\n has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included\n a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.\n \n 5.1.15 Teknikker\n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der sikrer adgang til udbudsdokumenterne offline: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Organisation, der modtager ansøgninger om deltagelse: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der behandler tilbud: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA\n \n \n 5.1 Teknisk ID for partiet: LOT-0003Titel: Lot 3 - SLF02 - Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems\n Beskrivelse: The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV\n single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated\n land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The\n deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02.\n The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender\n documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender\n documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also\n accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is\n offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support\n of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc.\n no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all\n three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent\n tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant\n applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for\n all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible\n to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is\n evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded\n more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement\n for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is\n divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount\n to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value:\n EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail\n concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n Intern identifikator: 24/13859 - Lot 3\n 5.1.1 Formål\n Primær klassificering (cpv): 31321300 Højspændingskabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31300000 Isolerede ledninger og kabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31320000 Stærkstrømskabler\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31340000 Kabeltilbehør, isoleret\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 31343000 Kabelsamlinger, isolerede\n Valgmuligheder:Beskrivelse af optioner: N/A\n \n \n 5.1.2 Udførelsessted\n Hvor som helst i det pågældende land\n Yderligere oplysninger: South Zealand - Denmark\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n Varigheds slutdato: 24-10-2030\n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 2.820.000 Euro\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: It should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required.\n If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be\n filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must\n be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via \"My answer\". Guidelines\n for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen,\n www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of\n the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but\n relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister\n company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the\n tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely,\n with a completed Part II \"Information on the economic operator\" and Part III \"Grounds\n for exclusion\" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV \"Selection criteria\".\n The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In\n addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of\n the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement\n of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations,\n partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating\n economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must\n also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be\n a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally,\n and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKriterium:Type: Økonomisk og finansiel formåen\n Navn: Economic and financial standing\n Beskrivelse: The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information\n from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity\n (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2.\n Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the\n applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of\n economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a\n separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant\n to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the\n applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a\n group of economic operators.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:Type: Økonomisk og finansiel formåen\n Navn: Economic and financial standing - minimum requirements\n Beskrivelse: LOT 3 – SLF-02 - Equity from the latest annual report, at the time of prequalification,\n be at least EUR 9,400,000.00 Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the\n time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct.\n and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds 28,200,000.00 Please notet\n that the minimum requirementy will be aggregatet for each lot a tenderer is awarded.\n This meens that tf a tenderer is prequalified to submit tenders for all three lots,\n and at the award stage is evaluated economically most advantageous for all three lots,\n the minimum requirement for the three lots are aggregated. Consequently, a tenderer\n to be awarded all three lots must have an equity amounting to min. 37,500,000.00 –\n EUR, and an equity ratio at 20pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct.\n the equity must be min. 113,300,000.00 - EUR.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:\n Navn: Selection of applicants\n Beskrivelse: If more than 5 applicants fulfill the minimum requirements, cf. section 2.2.1, the\n Contracting Authority will prequalify the 3-5 applicants who are evaluated as most\n suitable for the tendered contract. The selection of the most suitable applicants\n will be based on the applicant’s references c.f. section 2.2.2. The assessment of\n the references will be based on to which extent the references demonstrate extensive\n experience with deliveries comparable to the tendered assignment cf. Section 1.4 regarding\n solution, complexity, scope and purpose, especially concerning: • Voltage level •\n Length of cable route • Delivery lengths • Tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication,\n factory testing, supply, transport, construction (civil works not included), installation\n (joints, AIS – terminations, link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning\n and taking-over testing of the entire supply and its systems and functions) • Type-test,\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Contract value\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Kriterium:Type: Egnethed til at udøve det pågældende erhverv\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Ikke anvendt\n \n Kriterium:Type: Teknisk og faglig formåen\n Navn: For supply contracts: performance of deliveries of the specified type\n Beskrivelse: For public supply contracts only: During the reference period, the economic operator\n has delivered the following principal deliveries of the type specified. Contracting\n authorities may require up to three years and allow experience dating from more than\n three years.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n \n Kriterium:Type: Teknisk og faglig formåen\n Navn: Technical and professional ability\n Beskrivelse: The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and\n financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The\n ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C.\n For each lot the applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 (three) most comparable and\n relevant references undertaken in the past 5 (five) years as part of the application.\n By \"undertaken in the past 5 years” implies that the reference must not have been\n completed prior to the date reached when counting 5 years backwards from the submission\n date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration.\n References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the\n application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been\n delivered, and this may affect the assessment of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. Further,\n if references are obtained in collaboration with other parties, the applicant should\n clearly explain which elements have been carried out by the applicant. The references\n should describe a 220 kV (or above) underground cable systems, and include: • A specific\n description of deliveries, including: • Voltage level, length of cable route, maximum\n delivery lengths and tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication, factory testing, supply,\n transport, construction (civil works not included), installation (joints and AIS-terminations,\n link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning and taking-over testing of the\n entire supply and its systems and functions). • Description of type-test (if performed),\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Information about contact data (name, email and phone number) for references • Contract\n value (if possible) • Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any\n ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the assessment.\n Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is\n visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying\n on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators\n the maximum number of references must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when\n combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the\n most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet\n finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities\n capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD\n part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity.\n Anvendelse af dette kriterium: Anvendt\n Kriterierne vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 1\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive afvist\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender\n Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 55\n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer\n who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements\n will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality\n of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values,\n and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system\n is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness\n of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored.\n In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of\n having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of\n water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The\n quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation.\n It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide\n evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum\n allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and\n after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger\n bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller\n pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively.\n 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires\n (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively.\n 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting\n layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance:\n Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality\n of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated\n positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively.\n 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher\n current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of\n this sub-criterion\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 15\n \n Kriterium:\n Navn: Programme, organization and manpower\n Beskrivelse: The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned,\n realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential\n contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery\n within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that:\n 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded,\n programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for\n actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme\n contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning\n for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site\n and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability\n to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation\n phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark,\n with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further,\n interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent\n personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also\n covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall\n evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 20\n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms.\n Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part\n of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit\n and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion\n \"Contract terms\" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to\n the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this\n regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and\n shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance\n in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If\n the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in\n the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 10\n \n \n 5.1.11 UdbudsdokumenterAdresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n \n 5.1.12 UdbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Beskrivelse af den finansielle garanti: Please see description in tender conditions.\n Frist for modtagelse af interessetilkendegivelser: 30-05-2025 10:00 +00:00\n \n Oplysninger, der kan suppleres efter indgivelsesfristen er udløbet:Køberen kan beslutte, at visse manglende tilbudsrelaterede dokumenter kan indsendes senere.\n Yderligere oplysninger: -\n \n Betingelser for kontrakten:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: See template for contract\n Der kræves en fortrolighedsaftale: nej\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: ja\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Finansiel ordning: See the tender materiel. The tenderer's legal form is not required. If applications\n and tenders are submitted by a consortium, all participants in the consortium must\n be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract and a consortium\n member must be appointed with whom a binding agreement can be concluded on behalf\n of the consortium.\n \n Oplysninger om undersøgelsesfrister: Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints\n must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar\n days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the\n Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication\n date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed\n the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based\n on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons\n for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has\n sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority\n has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included\n a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.\n \n 5.1.15 Teknikker\n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der sikrer adgang til udbudsdokumenterne offline: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Organisation, der modtager ansøgninger om deltagelse: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation, der behandler tilbud: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA\n \n \n \n 8 Organisationer8.1 ORG-0001Officielt navn: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Registreringsnummer: 39 31 48 78\n Afdeling: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Postadresse: Tonne Kjærsvej 65 \n \n \n Landespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Kontaktpunkt: Procurement - A\n E-mail: procurement@energinet.dk\n \n Internetadresse: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/supplier/publictenders?B=ENERGINET\n Køberprofil: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/company/companyinformation/index/228008\n Denne organisations roller:\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren\n Organisation, der sikrer adgang til udbudsdokumenterne offline\n Organisation, der modtager ansøgninger om deltagelse\n Organisation, der behandler tilbud\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0002Officielt navn: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Registreringsnummer: 37795526\n Postadresse: Nævnenes Hus, Toldboden 2 \n \n \n Landespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Østsjælland (DK021)\n \n E-mail: klfu@naevneneshus.dk\n \n Internetadresse: https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/\n Denne organisations roller:Organisation med ansvar for klager\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0003Officielt navn: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Registreringsnummer: 10294819\n Postadresse: Carl Jacobsen Vej 35 \n \n \n Landespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)\n \n \n \n Internetadresse: http://www.kfst.dk\n Denne organisations roller:Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0004Officielt navn: Mercell Holding ASA\n Registreringsnummer: 980921565\n Postadresse: Askekroken 11 \n \n \n Landespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Oslo (NO081)\n \n \n E-mail: publication@mercell.com\n \n \n Internetadresse: http://mercell.com/\n Denne organisations roller:\n \n \n \n 11 Oplysninger om bekendtgørelsen11.1 Oplysninger om bekendtgørelsenIdentifikator for bekendtgørelsen: c6349004-4949-4b21-87bc-86a9ca9875c2 - 01\n Formulartype: Konkurrencevilkår\n Bekendtgørelsestype: Forhåndsmeddelelse eller vejledende periodisk bekendtgørelse, der er anvendt som indkaldelser af tilbud – standardordningen\n Afsendelsesdato for bekendtgørelsen: 09-05-2025 12:51 +00:00\n Dato for afsendelse af bekendtgørelse (eSender): 09-05-2025 13:03 +00:00\n Sprog, som denne bekendtgørelse er officielt tilgængelig på: engelsk \n \n 11.2 Oplysninger om offentliggørelsenBekendtgørelsesnummer: 00301627-2025\n \n Offentliggørelsesdato: 13-05-2025\n \n \n \n","htmlEN":"\n\n \n 1 Buyer1.1 BuyerOfficial name: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Activity of the contracting entity: Electricity-related activities\n \n \n 2 Procedure2.1 ProcedureTitle: NEA and SLF02 – Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems\n Description: The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV\n single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated\n land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The\n deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02.\n The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender\n documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender\n documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also\n accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is\n offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support\n of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc.\n no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all\n three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent\n tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant\n applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for\n all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible\n to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is\n evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded\n more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement\n for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is\n divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount\n to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value:\n EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail\n concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n Procedure identifier: b78bc229-3d81-4a61-9768-07bd447b5fba\n Internal identifier: 24/13859\n Type of procedure: Negotiated with prior publication of a call for competition / competitive with negotiation\n Main features of the procedure: The tender is an EU Tender with negotiations. The tenders must be valid for a period\n of 6 months from the specified time limit for submission\n 2.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Main classification (cpv): 31321300 High-voltage cable\n Additional classification (cpv): 31300000 Insulated wire and cable\n Additional classification (cpv): 31320000 Power distribution cables\n Additional classification (cpv): 31340000 Insulated cable accessories\n Additional classification (cpv): 31343000 Insulated cable joints\n \n 2.1.2 Place of performance\n Anywhere in the given country\n Additional information: East Jutland – South Zealand - Denmark\n \n 2.1.3 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 113.300.000 Euro\n \n 2.1.4 General informationAdditional information: It should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required.\n If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be\n filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must\n be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via \"My answer\". Guidelines\n for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen,\n www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of\n the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but\n relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister\n company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the\n tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely,\n with a completed Part II \"Information on the economic operator\" and Part III \"Grounds\n for exclusion\" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV \"Selection criteria\".\n The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In\n addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of\n the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement\n of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations,\n partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating\n economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must\n also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be\n a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally,\n and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.\n \n \n \n 2.1.6 Grounds for exclusionCorruption: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction\n rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly\n in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention\n on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or\n officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in\n Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating\n corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground\n also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority\n (contracting entity) or the economic operator\n Participation in a criminal organisation: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a\n criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which\n an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?\n As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008\n on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).\n Money laundering or terrorist financing: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or\n terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which\n an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?\n As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of\n the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system\n for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005,\n p. 15).\n Fraud: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction\n rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly\n in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the\n Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ\n C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).\n Child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other\n forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years\n ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to\n be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament\n and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human\n beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA\n (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).\n Guilty of misrepresentation, withheld information, unable to provide required documents and obtained confidential information of this procedure: Can the economic operator confirm that:a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation\n in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds\n for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,b) It has withheld such\n information,c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents\n required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, andd) It has undertaken\n to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting\n entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages\n in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that\n may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?\n Purely national exclusion grounds: Other exclusion grounds that may be foreseen in the national legislation of the contracting\n authority's or contracting entity's Member State. Has the economic operator breached\n its obligations relating to the purely national grounds of exclusion, which are specified\n in the relevant notice or in the procurement documents?\n Conflict of interest due to its participation in the procurement procedure: Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national\n law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in\n the procurement procedure?\n Direct or indirect involvement in the preparation of this procurement procedure: Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting\n authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the\n procurement procedure?\n Guilty of grave professional misconduct: Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable,\n see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.\n Payment of social security contributions: Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social\n security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member\n State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country\n of establishment?\n Payment of taxes: Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes,\n both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting\n authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?\n Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences\n or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five\n years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues\n to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of\n 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground\n also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as\n referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.\n \n \n \n 5 Lot5.1 Lot technical ID: LOT-0001Title: Lot 1 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems\n Description: The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV\n single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated\n land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The\n deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02.\n The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender\n documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender\n documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also\n accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is\n offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support\n of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc.\n no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all\n three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent\n tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant\n applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for\n all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible\n to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is\n evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded\n more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement\n for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is\n divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount\n to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value:\n EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail\n concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n Internal identifier: 24/13859 - Lot 1\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Main classification (cpv): 31321300 High-voltage cable\n Additional classification (cpv): 31300000 Insulated wire and cable\n Additional classification (cpv): 31320000 Power distribution cables\n Additional classification (cpv): 31340000 Insulated cable accessories\n Additional classification (cpv): 31343000 Insulated cable joints\n Options:Description of the options: N/A\n \n \n 5.1.2 Place of performance\n Anywhere in the given country\n Additional information: East Jutland - Denmark\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n Duration end date: 21-10-2032\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 42.550.000 Euro\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n Additional information: It should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required.\n If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be\n filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must\n be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via \"My answer\". Guidelines\n for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen,\n www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of\n the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but\n relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister\n company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the\n tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely,\n with a completed Part II \"Information on the economic operator\" and Part III \"Grounds\n for exclusion\" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV \"Selection criteria\".\n The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In\n addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of\n the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement\n of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations,\n partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating\n economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must\n also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be\n a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally,\n and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaCriterion:Type: Economic and financial standing\n Name: Economic and financial standing\n Description: The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information\n from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity\n (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2.\n Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the\n applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of\n economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a\n separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant\n to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the\n applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a\n group of economic operators.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:Type: Economic and financial standing\n Name: Economic and financial standing - minimum requirements\n Description: LOT 1 – NEA - Equity from the latest annual report must, at the time of prequalification,\n be at least EUR 14,200,000.00 Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at\n the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15\n pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds 42,550,000.00. Please\n notet that the minimum requirementy will be aggregatet for each lot a tenderer is\n awarded. This meens that tf a tenderer is prequalified to submit tenders for all three\n lots, and at the award stage is evaluated economically most advantageous for all three\n lots, the minimum requirement for the three lots are aggregated. Consequently, a tenderer\n to be awarded all three lots must have an equity amounting to min. 37,500,000.00 –\n EUR, and an equity ratio at 20pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct.\n the equity must be min. 113,300,000.00 - EUR.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:\n Name: Selection of applicants\n Description: If more than 5 applicants fulfill the minimum requirements, cf. section 2.2.1, the\n Contracting Authority will prequalify the 3-5 applicants who are evaluated as most\n suitable for the tendered contract. The selection of the most suitable applicants\n will be based on the applicant’s references c.f. section 2.2.2. The assessment of\n the references will be based on to which extent the references demonstrate extensive\n experience with deliveries comparable to the tendered assignment cf. Section 1.4 regarding\n solution, complexity, scope and purpose, especially concerning: • Voltage level •\n Length of cable route • Delivery lengths • Tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication,\n factory testing, supply, transport, construction (civil works not included), installation\n (joints, AIS – terminations, link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning\n and taking-over testing of the entire supply and its systems and functions) • Type-test,\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Contract value\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:Type: Suitability to pursue the professional activity\n Use of this criterion: Not used\n \n Criterion:Type: Technical and professional ability\n Name: Technical and professional ability\n Description: The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and\n financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The\n ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C.\n For each lot the applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 (three) most comparable and\n relevant references undertaken in the past 5 (five) years as part of the application.\n By \"undertaken in the past 5 years” implies that the reference must not have been\n completed prior to the date reached when counting 5 years backwards from the submission\n date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration.\n References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the\n application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been\n delivered, and this may affect the assessment of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. Further,\n if references are obtained in collaboration with other parties, the applicant should\n clearly explain which elements have been carried out by the applicant. The references\n should describe a 220 kV (or above) underground cable systems, and include: • A specific\n description of deliveries, including: • Voltage level, length of cable route, maximum\n delivery lengths and tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication, factory testing, supply,\n transport, construction (civil works not included), installation (joints and AIS-terminations,\n link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning and taking-over testing of the\n entire supply and its systems and functions). • Description of type-test (if performed),\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Information about contact data (name, email and phone number) for references • Contract\n value (if possible) • Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any\n ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the assessment.\n Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is\n visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying\n on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators\n the maximum number of references must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when\n combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the\n most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet\n finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities\n capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD\n part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 1\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender\n Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 55\n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer\n who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements\n will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality\n of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values,\n and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system\n is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness\n of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored.\n In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of\n having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of\n water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The\n quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation.\n It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide\n evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum\n allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and\n after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger\n bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller\n pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively.\n 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires\n (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively.\n 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting\n layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance:\n Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality\n of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated\n positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively.\n 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher\n current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of\n this sub-criterion\n Weight (percentage, exact): 15\n \n Criterion:\n Name: Programme, organization and manpower\n Description: The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned,\n realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential\n contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery\n within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that:\n 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded,\n programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for\n actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme\n contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning\n for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site\n and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability\n to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation\n phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark,\n with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further,\n interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent\n personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also\n covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall\n evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 20\n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms.\n Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part\n of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit\n and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion\n \"Contract terms\" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to\n the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this\n regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and\n shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance\n in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If\n the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in\n the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 10\n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsAddress of the procurement documents: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n Advanced or qualified electronic signature or seal (as defined in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014) is required\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Description of the financial guarantee: Please see description in tender conditions.\n Deadline for receipt of expressions of interest: 30-05-2025 10:00 +00:00\n \n Information that can be supplemented after the submission deadline:At the discretion of the buyer, some missing tenderer-related documents may be submitted later.\n Additional information: -\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: See template for contract\n A non-disclosure agreement is required: no\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: yes\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: See the tender materiel. The tenderer's legal form is not required. If applications\n and tenders are submitted by a consortium, all participants in the consortium must\n be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract and a consortium\n member must be appointed with whom a binding agreement can be concluded on behalf\n of the consortium.\n \n Information about review deadlines: Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints\n must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar\n days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the\n Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication\n date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed\n the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based\n on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons\n for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has\n sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority\n has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included\n a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.\n \n 5.1.15 Techniques\n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Organisation receiving requests to participate: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation processing tenders: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA\n \n \n 5.1 Lot technical ID: LOT-0002Title: Lot 2 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems\n Description: The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV\n single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated\n land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The\n deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02.\n The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender\n documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender\n documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also\n accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is\n offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support\n of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc.\n no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all\n three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent\n tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant\n applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for\n all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible\n to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is\n evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded\n more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement\n for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is\n divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount\n to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value:\n EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail\n concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n Internal identifier: 24/13859 - Lot 2\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Main classification (cpv): 31321300 High-voltage cable\n Additional classification (cpv): 31300000 Insulated wire and cable\n Additional classification (cpv): 31320000 Power distribution cables\n Additional classification (cpv): 31340000 Insulated cable accessories\n Additional classification (cpv): 31343000 Insulated cable joints\n Options:Description of the options: N/A\n \n \n 5.1.2 Place of performance\n Anywhere in the given country\n Additional information: East Jutland\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n Duration end date: 15-01-2032\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 42.550.000 Euro\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n Additional information: It should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required.\n If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be\n filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must\n be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via \"My answer\". Guidelines\n for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen,\n www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of\n the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but\n relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister\n company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the\n tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely,\n with a completed Part II \"Information on the economic operator\" and Part III \"Grounds\n for exclusion\" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV \"Selection criteria\".\n The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In\n addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of\n the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement\n of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations,\n partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating\n economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must\n also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be\n a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally,\n and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaCriterion:Type: Economic and financial standing\n Name: Economic and financial standing\n Description: The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information\n from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity\n (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2.\n Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the\n applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of\n economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a\n separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant\n to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the\n applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a\n group of economic operators.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:Type: Economic and financial standing\n Name: Economic and financial standing - minimum requirements\n Description: LOT 2 – NEA Equity from the latest annual report, at the time of prequalification,\n be at least EUR 14,200,000.00 Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at\n the time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15\n pct. and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds 42,550,000.00. Please\n notet that the minimum requirementy will be aggregatet for each lot a tenderer is\n awarded. This meens that tf a tenderer is prequalified to submit tenders for all three\n lots, and at the award stage is evaluated economically most advantageous for all three\n lots, the minimum requirement for the three lots are aggregated. Consequently, a tenderer\n to be awarded all three lots must have an equity amounting to min. 37,500,000.00 –\n EUR, and an equity ratio at 20pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct.\n the equity must be min. 113,300,000.00 - EUR.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:\n Name: Selection of applicants\n Description: If more than 5 applicants fulfill the minimum requirements, cf. section 2.2.1, the\n Contracting Authority will prequalify the 3-5 applicants who are evaluated as most\n suitable for the tendered contract. The selection of the most suitable applicants\n will be based on the applicant’s references c.f. section 2.2.2. The assessment of\n the references will be based on to which extent the references demonstrate extensive\n experience with deliveries comparable to the tendered assignment cf. Section 1.4 regarding\n solution, complexity, scope and purpose, especially concerning: • Voltage level •\n Length of cable route • Delivery lengths • Tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication,\n factory testing, supply, transport, construction (civil works not included), installation\n (joints, AIS – terminations, link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning\n and taking-over testing of the entire supply and its systems and functions) • Type-test,\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Contract value\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:Type: Suitability to pursue the professional activity\n Use of this criterion: Not used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:Type: Technical and professional ability\n Name: Technical and professional ability\n Description: The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and\n financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The\n ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C.\n For each lot the applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 (three) most comparable and\n relevant references undertaken in the past 5 (five) years as part of the application.\n By \"undertaken in the past 5 years” implies that the reference must not have been\n completed prior to the date reached when counting 5 years backwards from the submission\n date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration.\n References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the\n application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been\n delivered, and this may affect the assessment of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. Further,\n if references are obtained in collaboration with other parties, the applicant should\n clearly explain which elements have been carried out by the applicant. The references\n should describe a 220 kV (or above) underground cable systems, and include: • A specific\n description of deliveries, including: • Voltage level, length of cable route, maximum\n delivery lengths and tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication, factory testing, supply,\n transport, construction (civil works not included), installation (joints and AIS-terminations,\n link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning and taking-over testing of the\n entire supply and its systems and functions). • Description of type-test (if performed),\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Information about contact data (name, email and phone number) for references • Contract\n value (if possible) • Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any\n ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the assessment.\n Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is\n visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying\n on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators\n the maximum number of references must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when\n combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the\n most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet\n finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities\n capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD\n part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 1\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender\n Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 55\n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer\n who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements\n will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality\n of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values,\n and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system\n is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness\n of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored.\n In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of\n having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of\n water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The\n quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation.\n It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide\n evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum\n allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and\n after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger\n bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller\n pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively.\n 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires\n (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively.\n 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting\n layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance:\n Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality\n of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated\n positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively.\n 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher\n current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of\n this sub-criterion\n Weight (percentage, exact): 15\n \n Criterion:\n Name: Programme, organization and manpower\n Description: The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned,\n realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential\n contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery\n within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that:\n 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded,\n programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for\n actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme\n contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning\n for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site\n and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability\n to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation\n phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark,\n with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further,\n interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent\n personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also\n covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall\n evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 20\n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms.\n Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part\n of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit\n and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion\n \"Contract terms\" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to\n the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this\n regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and\n shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance\n in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If\n the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in\n the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 10\n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsAddress of the procurement documents: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Description of the financial guarantee: Please see description in tender conditions.\n Deadline for receipt of expressions of interest: 30-05-2025 10:00 +00:00\n \n Information that can be supplemented after the submission deadline:At the discretion of the buyer, some missing tenderer-related documents may be submitted later.\n Additional information: -\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: See template for contract\n A non-disclosure agreement is required: no\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: yes\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: See the tender materiel. The tenderer's legal form is not required. If applications\n and tenders are submitted by a consortium, all participants in the consortium must\n be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract and a consortium\n member must be appointed with whom a binding agreement can be concluded on behalf\n of the consortium.\n \n Information about review deadlines: Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints\n must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar\n days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the\n Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication\n date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed\n the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based\n on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons\n for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has\n sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority\n has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included\n a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.\n \n 5.1.15 Techniques\n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Organisation receiving requests to participate: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation processing tenders: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA\n \n \n 5.1 Lot technical ID: LOT-0003Title: Lot 3 - SLF02 - Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems\n Description: The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV\n single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated\n land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The\n deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02.\n The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender\n documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender\n documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also\n accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is\n offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support\n of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc.\n no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all\n three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent\n tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant\n applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for\n all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible\n to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is\n evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded\n more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement\n for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is\n divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount\n to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value:\n EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail\n concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n Internal identifier: 24/13859 - Lot 3\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Main classification (cpv): 31321300 High-voltage cable\n Additional classification (cpv): 31300000 Insulated wire and cable\n Additional classification (cpv): 31320000 Power distribution cables\n Additional classification (cpv): 31340000 Insulated cable accessories\n Additional classification (cpv): 31343000 Insulated cable joints\n Options:Description of the options: N/A\n \n \n 5.1.2 Place of performance\n Anywhere in the given country\n Additional information: South Zealand - Denmark\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n Duration end date: 24-10-2030\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 2.820.000 Euro\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n Additional information: It should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required.\n If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be\n filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must\n be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via \"My answer\". Guidelines\n for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen,\n www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of\n the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but\n relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister\n company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the\n tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely,\n with a completed Part II \"Information on the economic operator\" and Part III \"Grounds\n for exclusion\" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV \"Selection criteria\".\n The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In\n addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of\n the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement\n of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations,\n partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating\n economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must\n also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be\n a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally,\n and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaCriterion:Type: Economic and financial standing\n Name: Economic and financial standing\n Description: The applicant must confirm the economic ability in the ESPD part IV.B with information\n from the latest annual report regarding the following economic indicators: 1. Equity\n (total equity incl. share capital, reserves, revaluation, retained earning etc.) 2.\n Equity ratio (equity/total assets). This must be stated with two decimals. If the\n applicant relies on the capacities of other entities or the applicant is a group of\n economic operators the information for the ESPD part IV.B must also be given in a\n separate ESPD from each of these entities. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant\n to secure that the minimum requirements are reached based on consolidation when the\n applicant is relying on the capacity of other entities or when the applicant is a\n group of economic operators.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:Type: Economic and financial standing\n Name: Economic and financial standing - minimum requirements\n Description: LOT 3 – SLF-02 - Equity from the latest annual report, at the time of prequalification,\n be at least EUR 9,400,000.00 Equity ratio from the latest annual report must, at the\n time of prequalification, be at least 20 pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct.\n and 20 pct. the applicant can qualify if Equity exceeds 28,200,000.00 Please notet\n that the minimum requirementy will be aggregatet for each lot a tenderer is awarded.\n This meens that tf a tenderer is prequalified to submit tenders for all three lots,\n and at the award stage is evaluated economically most advantageous for all three lots,\n the minimum requirement for the three lots are aggregated. Consequently, a tenderer\n to be awarded all three lots must have an equity amounting to min. 37,500,000.00 –\n EUR, and an equity ratio at 20pct. If the equity ratio is between 15 pct. and 20 pct.\n the equity must be min. 113,300,000.00 - EUR.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:\n Name: Selection of applicants\n Description: If more than 5 applicants fulfill the minimum requirements, cf. section 2.2.1, the\n Contracting Authority will prequalify the 3-5 applicants who are evaluated as most\n suitable for the tendered contract. The selection of the most suitable applicants\n will be based on the applicant’s references c.f. section 2.2.2. The assessment of\n the references will be based on to which extent the references demonstrate extensive\n experience with deliveries comparable to the tendered assignment cf. Section 1.4 regarding\n solution, complexity, scope and purpose, especially concerning: • Voltage level •\n Length of cable route • Delivery lengths • Tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication,\n factory testing, supply, transport, construction (civil works not included), installation\n (joints, AIS – terminations, link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning\n and taking-over testing of the entire supply and its systems and functions) • Type-test,\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Contract value\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Criterion:Type: Suitability to pursue the professional activity\n Use of this criterion: Not used\n \n Criterion:Type: Technical and professional ability\n Name: For supply contracts: performance of deliveries of the specified type\n Description: For public supply contracts only: During the reference period, the economic operator\n has delivered the following principal deliveries of the type specified. Contracting\n authorities may require up to three years and allow experience dating from more than\n three years.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n \n Criterion:Type: Technical and professional ability\n Name: Technical and professional ability\n Description: The suitability of applicants fulfilling the minimum requirements to economic and\n financial standing will be assessed based on technical and professional ability. The\n ability will be assessed based on references which can be filled in ESPD part IV.C.\n For each lot the applicant is allowed to submit up to 3 (three) most comparable and\n relevant references undertaken in the past 5 (five) years as part of the application.\n By \"undertaken in the past 5 years” implies that the reference must not have been\n completed prior to the date reached when counting 5 years backwards from the submission\n date for prequalification. References older than this will not be taken into consideration.\n References which have not yet been fully completed can be included as part of the\n application, however the applicant must describe the parts which have not yet been\n delivered, and this may affect the assessment of the applicant, cf. section 2.3. Further,\n if references are obtained in collaboration with other parties, the applicant should\n clearly explain which elements have been carried out by the applicant. The references\n should describe a 220 kV (or above) underground cable systems, and include: • A specific\n description of deliveries, including: • Voltage level, length of cable route, maximum\n delivery lengths and tasks performed (e.g. design, fabrication, factory testing, supply,\n transport, construction (civil works not included), installation (joints and AIS-terminations,\n link boxes), completion, site testing, commissioning and taking-over testing of the\n entire supply and its systems and functions). • Description of type-test (if performed),\n including stress level at semi conducting layers. • Production and test facility for\n the power cables • Production and test facilities for the accessories • Place of Delivery\n • Information about contact data (name, email and phone number) for references • Contract\n value (if possible) • Date of initiation and final delivery (day, month, year) Any\n ambiguities and/or incomprehensibility may have a negative effect on the assessment.\n Please note the “description” box in ESPD part IV.C. can contain more text than is\n visible and it is possible to copy paste text into the box. If the applicant is relying\n on the capacity of other entities or the applicant is a group of economic operators\n the maximum number of references must still be respected and cannot exceed 3 when\n combined. If more are submitted, the Contracting Authority will only consider the\n most recent references determined by date of final delivery, in this case not yet\n finished references will not be included. If the applicant relies on other entities\n capacity or is part of a group of economic operators the information concerning ESPD\n part IV.C must be submitted in separate ESPD’s for each entity.\n Use of this criterion: Used\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 1\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: When evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender\n Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 55\n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer\n who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements\n will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality\n of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values,\n and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system\n is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness\n of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored.\n In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of\n having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of\n water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The\n quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation.\n It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide\n evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum\n allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and\n after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger\n bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller\n pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively.\n 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires\n (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively.\n 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting\n layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance:\n Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality\n of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated\n positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively.\n 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher\n current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of\n this sub-criterion\n Weight (percentage, exact): 15\n \n Criterion:\n Name: Programme, organization and manpower\n Description: The evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned,\n realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential\n contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery\n within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that:\n 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded,\n programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for\n actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme\n contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning\n for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site\n and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability\n to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation\n phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark,\n with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further,\n interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent\n personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also\n covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall\n evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 20\n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms.\n Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part\n of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit\n and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion\n \"Contract terms\" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to\n the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this\n regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and\n shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance\n in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If\n the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in\n the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 10\n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsAddress of the procurement documents: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B=\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Description of the financial guarantee: Please see description in tender conditions.\n Deadline for receipt of expressions of interest: 30-05-2025 10:00 +00:00\n \n Information that can be supplemented after the submission deadline:At the discretion of the buyer, some missing tenderer-related documents may be submitted later.\n Additional information: -\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: See template for contract\n A non-disclosure agreement is required: no\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: yes\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: See the tender materiel. The tenderer's legal form is not required. If applications\n and tenders are submitted by a consortium, all participants in the consortium must\n be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract and a consortium\n member must be appointed with whom a binding agreement can be concluded on behalf\n of the consortium.\n \n Information about review deadlines: Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints\n must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar\n days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the\n Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication\n date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed\n the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based\n on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons\n for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has\n sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority\n has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included\n a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.\n \n 5.1.15 Techniques\n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Organisation receiving requests to participate: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Organisation processing tenders: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA\n \n \n \n 8 Organisations8.1 ORG-0001Official name: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Registration number: 39 31 48 78\n Department: Energinet Eltransmission A/S\n Postal address: Tonne Kjærsvej 65 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Contact point: Procurement - A\n Email: procurement@energinet.dk\n \n Internet address: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/supplier/publictenders?B=ENERGINET\n Buyer profile: https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/company/companyinformation/index/228008\n Roles of this organisation:\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure\n Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents\n Organisation receiving requests to participate\n Organisation processing tenders\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0002Official name: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Registration number: 37795526\n Postal address: Nævnenes Hus, Toldboden 2 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Østsjælland (DK021)\n \n Email: klfu@naevneneshus.dk\n \n Internet address: https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0003Official name: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Registration number: 10294819\n Postal address: Carl Jacobsen Vej 35 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)\n \n \n \n Internet address: http://www.kfst.dk\n Roles of this organisation:Organisation providing more information on the review procedures\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0004Official name: Mercell Holding ASA\n Registration number: 980921565\n Postal address: Askekroken 11 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Oslo (NO081)\n \n \n Email: publication@mercell.com\n \n \n Internet address: http://mercell.com/\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n \n 11 Notice information11.1 Notice informationNotice identifier/version: c6349004-4949-4b21-87bc-86a9ca9875c2 - 01\n \n Notice type: Prior information notice or a periodic indicative notice used as a call for competition – standard regime\n Notice dispatch date: 09-05-2025 12:51 +00:00\n Notice dispatch date (eSender): 09-05-2025 13:03 +00:00\n Languages in which this notice is officially available: English \n \n 11.2 Publication informationNotice publication number: 00301627-2025\n OJ S issue number: 91/2025\n Publication date: 13-05-2025\n \n \n \n","opsummeringDA":{"card":{"titel":"NEA and SLF02 – Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems","ordregiver":"Energinet Eltransmission A/S","ordregiverId":"39314878","ordregiverIdDatavasket":"39314878","publiceringsdato":"2025-05-13+02:00","cpvKode":"31321300","cpvTitel":"Højspændingskabler","formulartype":"Konkurrencevilkår","formulartypeKode":"competition","tidsfrister":["2025-05-30T10:00:00Z","2025-05-30T10:00:00Z","2025-05-30T10:00:00Z"],"alleOrdregivere":["Energinet Eltransmission A/S"],"anslaaetVaerdi":"113300000","anslaaetVaerdiValuta":"EUR","beskrivelse":"The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. \n\nThe deliverables are divided into three lots: \nLot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02. The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender documents. \n\nFor further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n\nHowever please note the following: \nThe Contracting Authority will also accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc. no. 24/13859-18.\n\nIt is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. \n\nIf an applicant applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for all, this must be clearly stated in the application.\n\nPlease note that it is not possible to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot.\n \nIf the same tenderer is evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. \n\nThe tender is divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount to: \n\n• Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00\n\n• Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00\n\n• Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00\n\nFor further detail concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.","bkSubTypeKode":"11","bkSubType":"Vejledende periodisk bekendtgørelse anvendt som indkaldelse af tilbud – sektordirektivet, standardordningen","erAendring":false},"indholdsType":"HENTET_FRA_TED","sekundaereOrdregivere":[],"udforelsesstedNutsCode":[],"udforelsesstedSubLand":[],"udforelsesstedLand":["Danmark"],"udforelsesstedBy":[],"tilbudsfrister":[],"intressentfrister":["2025-05-30T10:00:00Z","2025-05-30T10:00:00Z","2025-05-30T10:00:00Z"],"deltagelsefrister":[],"antalParts":0,"antalLots":3,"udbudsDokumenter":["https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B="]},"opsummeringEN":{"card":{"titel":"NEA and SLF02 – Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems","ordregiver":"Energinet Eltransmission A/S","ordregiverId":"39314878","ordregiverIdDatavasket":"39314878","publiceringsdato":"2025-05-13+02:00","cpvKode":"31321300","cpvTitel":"High-voltage cable","formulartype":"Competition","formulartypeKode":"competition","tidsfrister":["2025-05-30T10:00:00Z","2025-05-30T10:00:00Z","2025-05-30T10:00:00Z"],"alleOrdregivere":["Energinet Eltransmission A/S"],"anslaaetVaerdi":"113300000","anslaaetVaerdiValuta":"EUR","beskrivelse":"The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. \n\nThe deliverables are divided into three lots: \nLot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02. The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender documents. \n\nFor further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.\n\nHowever please note the following: \nThe Contracting Authority will also accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc. no. 24/13859-18.\n\nIt is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. \n\nIf an applicant applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for all, this must be clearly stated in the application.\n\nPlease note that it is not possible to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot.\n \nIf the same tenderer is evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. \n\nThe tender is divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount to: \n\n• Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00\n\n• Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00\n\n• Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00\n\nFor further detail concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.","bkSubTypeKode":"11","bkSubType":"Periodic indicative notice used as a call for competition – sectoral directive, standard regime","erAendring":false},"indholdsType":"HENTET_FRA_TED","sekundaereOrdregivere":[],"udforelsesstedNutsCode":[],"udforelsesstedSubLand":[],"udforelsesstedLand":["Denmark"],"udforelsesstedBy":[],"tilbudsfrister":[],"intressentfrister":["2025-05-30T10:00:00Z","2025-05-30T10:00:00Z","2025-05-30T10:00:00Z"],"deltagelsefrister":[],"antalParts":0,"antalLots":3,"udbudsDokumenter":["https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=431332&B="]}}