{"bekendtgoerelseNoegle":{"noticeId":{"value":"a0323f3a-68a4-4ee1-94ac-d44126962850"},"noticeVersion":{"value":"01"},"noticePublicationNumber":{"value":"00757322-2026"}},"htmlDA":"\n\n \n 1 Køber1.1 KøberOfficielt navn: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Køberens retlige status: Offentligretligt organ, der styres af en central regeringsmyndighed\n Den ordregivende myndigheds aktivitet: Generelle offentlige tjenesteydelser\n \n \n 2 Procedure2.1 ProcedureTitel: Digital Oblique Image Acquisition and AT 2027-2030\n Beskrivelse: The Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. Agency for Climate Data (KDS),\n intend to establish a common oblique image dataset as a public geographical administrative\n basis for digital management (e-governance) in Denmark. The data set was first established\n in 2017 and updated in 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 using the same specification with\n amendments. This tender is more or less the same service, but with updated specification\n using the experiences from the previous five acquisitions.
The purpose of\n the tender is to create the necessary high-quality oblique image’s in digital form,\n without blurring effects (clouds, smog etc.) and with a contrast and brightness sufficient\n to distinguish details and objects corresponding to actual ground sample distance\n (GSD) of 10 cm in centre pixel of the images.
The oblique photography’s must\n be acquired during a timeframe during March 21st to September 21st and the tender\n is divided into five Lots/sub-agreements, where a Supplier can win maximum 2 Lots/sub-agreements.
The\n framework in 2027 is covering one acquisition period, with the possibility of a second\n country wide acquisi-tion if the resources are granted under the government budget\n for 2029.
To assist with the tendering the image quality from 2017, 2019,\n 2021, 2023 and 2025 can be observed here:
https://skraafoto.dataforsyningen.dk/\n Identifikator for proceduren: 30f29e88-bf61-47a3-a90e-15db321f8028\n \n Udbudsprocedure: Offentligt udbud\n Proceduren er en hasteprocedure: nej\n Hovedpunkterne i proceduren: The Suppliers must bid for all lots but can maximum win two lots\n 2.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 71000000 Arkitekt-, konstruktions-, ingeniør- og inspektionsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71240000 Arkitekt-, ingeniør- og planlægningsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354100 Digital kortlægning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71355100 Fotogrammetritjenester\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222100 Kortlægning af byområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222200 Kortlægning af landområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354200 Kortlægning fra luften\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 79961200 Luftfotografering\n \n 2.1.2 UdførelsesstedLandsdel (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: All five lots are spread out over Denmark\n \n 2.1.3 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 40.000.000 Dansk krone\n Rammeaftalens maksimumværdi: 70.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 2.1.4 Generelle oplysningerYderligere oplysninger: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also\n exclude economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU\n regulation 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.\n \n \n \n 2.1.5 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Det højeste antal delkontrakter, for hvilket en tilbudsgiver kan indgive tilbud: 5\n Tilbudsgiveren skal indgive tilbud på alle delkontrakter\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Det højeste antal delkontrakter, for hvilket der kan tildeles kontrakter til én tilbudsgiver: 2\n \n \n 2.1.6 UdelukkelsesgrundeKilder til grundlag for udelukkelse: Bekendtgørelse\n Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser på miljølovgivningsområdet: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has failed\n to fulfil applicable environmental, social or labour law obligations under Union law,\n national law, collective agreements or environmental, social or labour law obligations\n derived from the conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European\n Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing\n Directive 2004/18/EC (Official Journal 2014, No L 94, page 65) or are the subject\n of acts adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Directive\n in accordance with Article 88. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser på sociallovgivningsområdet: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has failed\n to fulfil applicable environmental, social or labour law obligations under Union law,\n national law, collective agreements or environmental, social or labour law obligations\n derived from the conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European\n Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing\n Directive 2004/18/EC (Official Journal 2014, No L 94, page 65) or are the subject\n of acts adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Directive\n in accordance with Article 88. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser på det arbejdsretlige område: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has failed\n to fulfil applicable environmental, social or labour law obligations under Union law,\n national law, collective agreements or environmental, social or labour law obligations\n derived from the conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European\n Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing\n Directive 2004/18/EC (Official Journal 2014, No L 94, page 65) or are the subject\n of acts adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Directive\n in accordance with Article 88. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Konkurs: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Insolvens: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Tvangsakkord uden for konkurs: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n En situation, der svarer til konkurs i henhold til national ret: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Aktiver, der administreres af en kurator: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Erhvervsvirksomheden er indstillet: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Alvorlige forsømmelser i forbindelse med udøvelsen af erhvervet: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate\n or tenderer has been guilty of grave professional misconduct casting doubt on the\n integrity of the candidate or tenderer. Documentation: The contracting entity shall\n be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer\n is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Aftaler med andre økonomiske aktører med henblik på konkurrencefordrejning: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity has sufficient plausible indications to conclude that the\n candidate or tenderer has concluded an agreement with other economic operators with\n a view to distorting competition. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Interessekonflikt som følge af deltagelse i udbudsproceduren: A contracting entity must exclude a candidate or a tenderer from participation in\n a procurement procedure when the contracting entity can demonstrate that a conflict\n of interest, cf. section 24(18) of the Danish Public Procurement Act, cannot be effectively\n remedied by less restrictive measures in relation to the procurement procedure in\n question. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate\n evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give\n rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Direkte eller indirekte involvering i forberedelsen af denne udbudsprocedure: A contracting entity must exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that a distortion\n of competition within the meaning of Section 39 of the Public Procurement Act resulting\n from the prior involvement of economic operators in the preparation of the procurement\n procedure in relation to the procurement procedure in question cannot be remedied\n by less restrictive measures. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Ophævelse eller en lignende sanktion: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has materially\n breached a previous public contract, contract with a utility or concession contract\n and the breach has resulted in the termination of that contract or a similar sanction.\n Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence\n as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion\n pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Afgivelse af urigtige oplysninger, tilbageholdelse af oplysninger, ude af stand til at fremlægge de dokumenter, der anmodes om, eller indhentede fortrolige oplysninger i forbindelse med denne procedure: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate\n or tenderer has supplied grossly incorrect information, has withheld information or\n is unable to submit additional documents concerning the grounds for exclusion referred\n to in Section 135(1) or (3) of the Public Procurement Act and, where applicable, In\n section 137(1), no. 2 or 6 of the Public Procurement Act, the minimum requirements\n for suitability laid down in sections 140-144 of the Public Procurement Act or the\n selection in section 145. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Rent nationale udelukkelsesgrunde: Section 134a of the Danish Public Procurement Act applies, which is why a contracting\n entity must exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer is established in a country that is included on the EU\n list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions and has not acceded to the WTO's Government\n Procurement Agreement or other trade agreements obliging Denmark to open the market\n for public contracts to tenderers established in that country. Section 134a (2) of\n the Public Procurement Act: Section 135(6) applies mutatis mutandis to situations\n covered by subsection (1). Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Terrorhandlinger eller strafbare handlinger med forbindelse til terroraktivitet: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences related to terrorist activities\n as defined respectively in Articles 1, 3 and 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA\n of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (Official Journal 2002, No L 164, page 3) as\n amended by Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA of 28 November 2008 amending Framework\n Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism (Official Journal 2008, No L 330, page\n 21). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act\n Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af bidrag til sociale sikringsordninger: The contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer who has unpaid overdue\n debts of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities relating to taxes, duties or social\n security contributions under Danish law or the law of the country in which the applicant\n or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of\n the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af skatter og afgifter: The contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer who has unpaid overdue\n debts of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities relating to taxes, duties or social\n security contributions under Danish law or the law of the country in which the applicant\n or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of\n the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Deltagelse i en kriminel organisation: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine by final judgment for acts committed within the framework of a criminal organisation\n as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008\n (Official Journal 2008, No L 300, page 42). Documentation: in accordance with sections\n 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Hvidvaskning af penge eller finansiering af terrorisme: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or fined\n by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing as defined in Article\n 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October\n 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money\n laundering and terrorist financing (Official Journal 2005, No L 309, page 15). Documentation:\n in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Svig: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine for fraud within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection\n of the European Communities' financial interests by final judgment. Documentation:\n in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Børnearbejde og andre former for menneskehandel: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure if the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine by final judgment for an infringement of Section 262a of the Criminal Code\n or, in the case of a conviction from another country concerning child labour and other\n forms of trafficking in human beings as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU\n of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating\n trafficking in human beings and protecting victims thereof, and replacing Council\n Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (Official Journal 2011, No L 101, page 1). Documentation:\n in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Korruption: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine for corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against\n corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member\n States of the European Union and Article 2(1) of the European Union Council Framework\n Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the fight against corruption in the private\n sector (Official Journal 2003, No L 192, page 54) and corruption as defined by the\n national law of the Member State or home Member State of the candidate or tenderer\n or of the country in which the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation:\n in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n \n \n \n 5 Delkontrakt5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0001\n Beskrivelse: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8966km2\n \n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 71000000 Arkitekt-, konstruktions-, ingeniør- og inspektionsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71240000 Arkitekt-, ingeniør- og planlægningsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354100 Digital kortlægning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71355100 Fotogrammetritjenester\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222100 Kortlægning af byområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222200 Kortlægning af landområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354200 Kortlægning fra luften\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 79961200 Luftfotografering\n Mængde: 8.966 kvadratkilometer\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedLandsdel (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 8.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Navnene på og de faglige kvalifikationer for det personale, der skal udføre kontrakten, skal angives: Krav til tilbud\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Dette udbud er også egnet for små og mellemstore virksomheder (SMV'er): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.7 Strategiske udbudFormålet med strategiske udbud: Ingen strategiske udbud\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Generel årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Specifik årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Professionel risikoansvarsforsikringBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Kriterium: Relevante uddannelses- og erhvervskvalifikationerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Kriterium: Værktøj, anlæg eller teknisk udstyrBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 10\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterSprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk\n Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af tilbud: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Varighed, hvor tilbuddet skal forblive gyldigt: 3 Måned\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The tenderer is obliged to comply with the contracting authority’s labour clause in\n connection with its performance of the framework agreement.
\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale delvis uden og delvis med fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n Yderligere omfattede købere: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation, der sikrer adgang til udbudsdokumenterne offline: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n Organisation, der modtager ansøgninger om deltagelse: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation, der behandler tilbud: Klimadatastyrelsen\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0002\n Beskrivelse: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8744km2\n \n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 71000000 Arkitekt-, konstruktions-, ingeniør- og inspektionsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71240000 Arkitekt-, ingeniør- og planlægningsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354100 Digital kortlægning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71355100 Fotogrammetritjenester\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222100 Kortlægning af byområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222200 Kortlægning af landområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354200 Kortlægning fra luften\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 79961200 Luftfotografering\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedLandsdel (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Generel årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Specifik årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Professionel risikoansvarsforsikringBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Kriterium: Relevante uddannelses- og erhvervskvalifikationerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Kriterium: Værktøj, anlæg eller teknisk udstyrBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 10\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterAdresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af tilbud: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Varighed, hvor tilbuddet skal forblive gyldigt: 3 Måned\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale delvis uden og delvis med fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n Yderligere omfattede købere: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0003\n Beskrivelse: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8711 km2\n \n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 71000000 Arkitekt-, konstruktions-, ingeniør- og inspektionsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71240000 Arkitekt-, ingeniør- og planlægningsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354100 Digital kortlægning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71355100 Fotogrammetritjenester\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222100 Kortlægning af byområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222200 Kortlægning af landområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354200 Kortlægning fra luften\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 79961200 Luftfotografering\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedLandsdel (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Generel årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Specifik årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Professionel risikoansvarsforsikringBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Kriterium: Relevante uddannelses- og erhvervskvalifikationerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Kriterium: Værktøj, anlæg eller teknisk udstyrBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 10\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterAdresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af tilbud: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Varighed, hvor tilbuddet skal forblive gyldigt: 3 Måned\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale delvis uden og delvis med fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n Yderligere omfattede købere: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0004\n Beskrivelse: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8526km2\n \n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 71000000 Arkitekt-, konstruktions-, ingeniør- og inspektionsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71240000 Arkitekt-, ingeniør- og planlægningsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354100 Digital kortlægning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71355100 Fotogrammetritjenester\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222100 Kortlægning af byområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222200 Kortlægning af landområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354200 Kortlægning fra luften\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 79961200 Luftfotografering\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedLandsdel (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Generel årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Specifik årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Professionel risikoansvarsforsikringBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Kriterium: Relevante uddannelses- og erhvervskvalifikationerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Kriterium: Værktøj, anlæg eller teknisk udstyrBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 10\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterAdresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af tilbud: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Varighed, hvor tilbuddet skal forblive gyldigt: 3 Måned\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale delvis uden og delvis med fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n Yderligere omfattede købere: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0005\n Beskrivelse: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8117m2\n \n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 71000000 Arkitekt-, konstruktions-, ingeniør- og inspektionsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71240000 Arkitekt-, ingeniør- og planlægningsvirksomhed\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354100 Digital kortlægning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71355100 Fotogrammetritjenester\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222100 Kortlægning af byområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71222200 Kortlægning af landområder\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 71354200 Kortlægning fra luften\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 79961200 Luftfotografering\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedLandsdel (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Generel årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Specifik årlig omsætningBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Kriterium: Professionel risikoansvarsforsikringBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Kriterium: Relevante uddannelses- og erhvervskvalifikationerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Kriterium: Værktøj, anlæg eller teknisk udstyrBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 10\n \n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterAdresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af tilbud: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Varighed, hvor tilbuddet skal forblive gyldigt: 3 Måned\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale delvis uden og delvis med fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n Yderligere omfattede købere: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n \n 8 Organisationer8.1 ORG-0001Officielt navn: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Registreringsnummer: 37284114\n Postadresse: Sankt Kjelds Plads 11 \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Enhed: Eskil Kjærshøj Nielsen Kjærshøj Nielsen\n \n \n Denne organisations roller:\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren\n Organisation, der sikrer adgang til udbudsdokumenterne offline\n Organisation, der modtager ansøgninger om deltagelse\n Organisation, der behandler tilbud\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-1000Officielt navn: Comdia ApS\n Registreringsnummer: 33501404\n Postadresse: Lindvedvej 71 \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Fyn (DK031)\n \n E-mail: support@comdia.com\n \n Internetadresse: https://www.comdia.com/\n Denne organisations roller:\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-1001Officielt navn: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Registreringsnummer: 37795526\n Postadresse: Danish Appeals Boards Authority, Toldboden 2 \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Vestjylland (DK041)\n \n E-mail: klfu@naevneneshus.dk\n \n Internetadresse: http://www.klfu.dk\n Denne organisations roller:Organisation med ansvar for klager\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-1002Officielt navn: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n Registreringsnummer: 10294819\n Postadresse: Carl Jacobsens Vej 35 \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)\n \n \n \n Internetadresse: https://www.kfst.dk/\n Denne organisations roller:Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne\n \n \n \n Oplysninger om bekendtgørelsenBekendtgørelsens ID: a0323f3a-68a4-4ee1-94ac-d44126962850 - 01\n Formulartype: Konkurrencevilkår\n Bekendtgørelsestype: Udbuds- eller koncessionsbekendtgørelse – standardordningen\n Afsendelsesdato for bekendtgørelsen: 29-10-2026 15:21 +01:00\n Bekendtgørelsens officielle sprog: engelsk \n Bekendtgørelsesnummer: 00757322-2026\n \n Offentliggørelsesdato: 02-11-2026\n \n \n","htmlEN":"\n\n \n 1 Buyer1.1 BuyerOfficial name: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Legal type of the buyer: Body governed by public law, controlled by a central government authority\n Activity of the contracting authority: General public services\n \n \n 2 Procedure2.1 ProcedureTitle: Digital Oblique Image Acquisition and AT 2027-2030\n Description: The Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. Agency for Climate Data (KDS),\n intend to establish a common oblique image dataset as a public geographical administrative\n basis for digital management (e-governance) in Denmark. The data set was first established\n in 2017 and updated in 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 using the same specification with\n amendments. This tender is more or less the same service, but with updated specification\n using the experiences from the previous five acquisitions.
The purpose of\n the tender is to create the necessary high-quality oblique image’s in digital form,\n without blurring effects (clouds, smog etc.) and with a contrast and brightness sufficient\n to distinguish details and objects corresponding to actual ground sample distance\n (GSD) of 10 cm in centre pixel of the images.
The oblique photography’s must\n be acquired during a timeframe during March 21st to September 21st and the tender\n is divided into five Lots/sub-agreements, where a Supplier can win maximum 2 Lots/sub-agreements.
The\n framework in 2027 is covering one acquisition period, with the possibility of a second\n country wide acquisi-tion if the resources are granted under the government budget\n for 2029.
To assist with the tendering the image quality from 2017, 2019,\n 2021, 2023 and 2025 can be observed here:
https://skraafoto.dataforsyningen.dk/\n Procedure identifier: 30f29e88-bf61-47a3-a90e-15db321f8028\n Internal identifier: 827629\n \n The procedure is accelerated: no\n Main features of the procedure: The Suppliers must bid for all lots but can maximum win two lots\n 2.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 71000000 Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354100 Digital mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71355100 Photogrammetry services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222100 Urban areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222200 Rural areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354200 Aerial mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 79961200 Aerial photography services\n \n 2.1.2 Place of performanceCountry subdivision (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Additional information: All five lots are spread out over Denmark\n \n 2.1.3 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 40.000.000 Danish krone\n Maximum value of the framework agreement: 70.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 2.1.4 General informationAdditional information: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also\n exclude economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU\n regulation 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.\n \n \n \n 2.1.5 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Maximum number of lots for which one tenderer can submit tenders: 5\n The tenderer must submit tenders for all lots\n \n Terms of contract:Maximum number of lots for which contracts can be awarded to one tenderer: 2\n \n \n 2.1.6 Grounds for exclusionSources of grounds for exclusion: Notice\n Breaching of obligations in the fields of environmental law: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has failed\n to fulfil applicable environmental, social or labour law obligations under Union law,\n national law, collective agreements or environmental, social or labour law obligations\n derived from the conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European\n Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing\n Directive 2004/18/EC (Official Journal 2014, No L 94, page 65) or are the subject\n of acts adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Directive\n in accordance with Article 88. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Breaching of obligations in the fields of social law: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has failed\n to fulfil applicable environmental, social or labour law obligations under Union law,\n national law, collective agreements or environmental, social or labour law obligations\n derived from the conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European\n Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing\n Directive 2004/18/EC (Official Journal 2014, No L 94, page 65) or are the subject\n of acts adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Directive\n in accordance with Article 88. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Breaching of obligations in the fields of labour law: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has failed\n to fulfil applicable environmental, social or labour law obligations under Union law,\n national law, collective agreements or environmental, social or labour law obligations\n derived from the conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European\n Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing\n Directive 2004/18/EC (Official Journal 2014, No L 94, page 65) or are the subject\n of acts adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Directive\n in accordance with Article 88. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Bankruptcy: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Insolvency: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Arrangement with creditors: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Analogous situation like bankruptcy, insolvency or arrangement with creditors under national law: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Assets being administered by liquidator: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Business activities are suspended: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency\n or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court\n if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or\n if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national\n law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with\n sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Grave professional misconduct: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate\n or tenderer has been guilty of grave professional misconduct casting doubt on the\n integrity of the candidate or tenderer. Documentation: The contracting entity shall\n be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer\n is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity has sufficient plausible indications to conclude that the\n candidate or tenderer has concluded an agreement with other economic operators with\n a view to distorting competition. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Conflict of interest due to its participation in the procurement procedure: A contracting entity must exclude a candidate or a tenderer from participation in\n a procurement procedure when the contracting entity can demonstrate that a conflict\n of interest, cf. section 24(18) of the Danish Public Procurement Act, cannot be effectively\n remedied by less restrictive measures in relation to the procurement procedure in\n question. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate\n evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give\n rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Direct or indirect involvement in the preparation of this procurement procedure: A contracting entity must exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that a distortion\n of competition within the meaning of Section 39 of the Public Procurement Act resulting\n from the prior involvement of economic operators in the preparation of the procurement\n procedure in relation to the procurement procedure in question cannot be remedied\n by less restrictive measures. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Early termination, damages, or other comparable sanctions: A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure\n if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has materially\n breached a previous public contract, contract with a utility or concession contract\n and the breach has resulted in the termination of that contract or a similar sanction.\n Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence\n as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion\n pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Misrepresentation, withheld information, unable to provide required documents or obtained confidential information of this procedure: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate\n or tenderer has supplied grossly incorrect information, has withheld information or\n is unable to submit additional documents concerning the grounds for exclusion referred\n to in Section 135(1) or (3) of the Public Procurement Act and, where applicable, In\n section 137(1), no. 2 or 6 of the Public Procurement Act, the minimum requirements\n for suitability laid down in sections 140-144 of the Public Procurement Act or the\n selection in section 145. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Purely national exclusion grounds: Section 134a of the Danish Public Procurement Act applies, which is why a contracting\n entity must exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure\n if the candidate or tenderer is established in a country that is included on the EU\n list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions and has not acceded to the WTO's Government\n Procurement Agreement or other trade agreements obliging Denmark to open the market\n for public contracts to tenderers established in that country. Section 134a (2) of\n the Public Procurement Act: Section 135(6) applies mutatis mutandis to situations\n covered by subsection (1). Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled\n to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation\n which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion.\n Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences related to terrorist activities\n as defined respectively in Articles 1, 3 and 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA\n of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (Official Journal 2002, No L 164, page 3) as\n amended by Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA of 28 November 2008 amending Framework\n Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism (Official Journal 2008, No L 330, page\n 21). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act\n Breaching obligation relating to payment of social security contributions: The contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer who has unpaid overdue\n debts of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities relating to taxes, duties or social\n security contributions under Danish law or the law of the country in which the applicant\n or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of\n the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Breaching obligation relating to payment of taxes: The contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer who has unpaid overdue\n debts of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities relating to taxes, duties or social\n security contributions under Danish law or the law of the country in which the applicant\n or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of\n the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Participation in a criminal organisation: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine by final judgment for acts committed within the framework of a criminal organisation\n as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008\n (Official Journal 2008, No L 300, page 42). Documentation: in accordance with sections\n 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Money laundering or terrorist financing: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or fined\n by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing as defined in Article\n 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October\n 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money\n laundering and terrorist financing (Official Journal 2005, No L 309, page 15). Documentation:\n in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Fraud: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine for fraud within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection\n of the European Communities' financial interests by final judgment. Documentation:\n in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Child labour and including other forms of trafficking in human beings: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure if the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine by final judgment for an infringement of Section 262a of the Criminal Code\n or, in the case of a conviction from another country concerning child labour and other\n forms of trafficking in human beings as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU\n of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating\n trafficking in human beings and protecting victims thereof, and replacing Council\n Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (Official Journal 2011, No L 101, page 1). Documentation:\n in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n Corruption: A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a\n procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted\n a fine for corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against\n corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member\n States of the European Union and Article 2(1) of the European Union Council Framework\n Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the fight against corruption in the private\n sector (Official Journal 2003, No L 192, page 54) and corruption as defined by the\n national law of the Member State or home Member State of the candidate or tenderer\n or of the country in which the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation:\n in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n \n \n \n 5 Lot5.1 Lot: LOT-0001\n Description: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8966km2\n Internal identifier: 828092\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 71000000 Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354100 Digital mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71355100 Photogrammetry services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222100 Urban areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222200 Rural areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354200 Aerial mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 79961200 Aerial photography services\n Quantity: 8.966 square kilometre\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performanceCountry subdivision (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Additional information: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 8.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n The names and professional qualifications of the staff assigned to perform the contract must be given: Tender requirement\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): yes\n Additional information: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.7 Strategic procurementAim of strategic procurement: No strategic procurement\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: General yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Specific yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Professional risk indemnity insuranceDescription of selection criterion: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Criterion: Relevant educational and professional qualificationsDescription of selection criterion: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Criterion: Tools, plant, or technical equipmentDescription of selection criterion: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 10\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsLanguages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English\n Address of the procurement documents: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of tenders: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Duration during which the tender must remain valid: 3 Month\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The tenderer is obliged to comply with the contracting authority’s labour clause in\n connection with its performance of the framework agreement.
\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n Additional buyer coverage: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n Organisation receiving requests to participate: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation processing tenders: Klimadatastyrelsen\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0002\n Description: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8744km2\n Internal identifier: 828093\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 71000000 Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354100 Digital mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71355100 Photogrammetry services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222100 Urban areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222200 Rural areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354200 Aerial mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 79961200 Aerial photography services\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performanceCountry subdivision (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Additional information: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n Additional information: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: General yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Specific yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Professional risk indemnity insuranceDescription of selection criterion: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Criterion: Relevant educational and professional qualificationsDescription of selection criterion: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Criterion: Tools, plant, or technical equipmentDescription of selection criterion: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 10\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsAddress of the procurement documents: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of tenders: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Duration during which the tender must remain valid: 3 Month\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n Additional buyer coverage: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0003\n Description: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8711 km2\n Internal identifier: 828094\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 71000000 Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354100 Digital mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71355100 Photogrammetry services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222100 Urban areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222200 Rural areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354200 Aerial mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 79961200 Aerial photography services\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performanceCountry subdivision (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Additional information: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n Additional information: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: General yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Specific yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Professional risk indemnity insuranceDescription of selection criterion: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Criterion: Relevant educational and professional qualificationsDescription of selection criterion: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Criterion: Tools, plant, or technical equipmentDescription of selection criterion: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 10\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsAddress of the procurement documents: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of tenders: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Duration during which the tender must remain valid: 3 Month\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n Additional buyer coverage: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0004\n Description: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8526km2\n Internal identifier: 828095\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 71000000 Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354100 Digital mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71355100 Photogrammetry services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222100 Urban areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222200 Rural areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354200 Aerial mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 79961200 Aerial photography services\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performanceCountry subdivision (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Additional information: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n Additional information: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: General yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Specific yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Professional risk indemnity insuranceDescription of selection criterion: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Criterion: Relevant educational and professional qualificationsDescription of selection criterion: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Criterion: Tools, plant, or technical equipmentDescription of selection criterion: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 10\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsAddress of the procurement documents: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of tenders: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Duration during which the tender must remain valid: 3 Month\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n Additional buyer coverage: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0005\n Description: Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8117m2\n Internal identifier: 828096\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 71000000 Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354100 Digital mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71355100 Photogrammetry services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222100 Urban areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71222200 Rural areas mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 71354200 Aerial mapping services\n Additional classification (cpv): 79961200 Aerial photography services\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performanceCountry subdivision (NUTS): Extra-Regio NUTS 3 (DKZZZ)\n \n Additional information: The lot is spread out over the country, and not just the specific place.\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n Additional information: The tenderer must complete and submit the ESPD as preliminary proof of compliance\n with the requirements set out in section 148(1)(i)-(iii) of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act.
Prior to the decision on award of the framework agreement, documentation\n of the information provided in the ESPD must be submitted, see sections 151 and 152\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
By way of documentation that a tenderer\n does not fall within the scope of one of the grounds for exclusion set out in section\n 135(1) and (3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi), the following must be provided in\n accordance with section 153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act:
- an extract\n from a relevant register or an equivalent document showing that the tenderer is not\n encompassed by section 135(1) and a certificate proving that the tenderer does not\n fall within section 135(3) and section 137(1)(ii) and (vi);
- where the country\n in question does not issue such documentation, or where these do not cover all the\n cases specified in section 135(1) or (3) and section 137(1) (ii) and (vi), they may\n be replaced by a declaration on oath or, in countries where there is no provision\n for declarations on oath, by a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial\n authority etc.
For Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided in the form\n of a service certificate. Where a tenderer, one or more members of a group or other\n entities are from another EU/EEA country, such entity must generally provide the types\n of documentation specified in e-Certis.
The contracting authority can however\n request a tenderer for further documentation and examine such obtained documentation,\n if the contracting authority considers this being necessary for the correct conduction\n of the procurement procedure.
The tenderer shall not provide documentation for\n not being subject to the mandatory ground for exclusion set out in section 134 a.\n For other grounds for exclusion in the Danish Public Procurement Act than stated above,\n the contracting authority must demonstrate or have sufficiently plausible indications\n to conclude that one of the grounds for exclusion applies to the tenderer.
A\n tenderer to whom a ground for exclusion applies is excluded from participating in\n the procurement process, unless the tenderer has provided sufficient documentation\n of its reliability in accordance with section 138 of the Danish Public Procurement\n Act, except for the ground for exclusion in section 134 a, where the tenderer does\n not have the possibility to document reliability.
The contracting authority may\n only exclude a tenderer, if the contracting authority has informed the concerned tenderer\n that it is subject to a ground for exclusion and if the tenderer has not within an\n appropriate time limit provided sufficient documentation of its reliability, or if\n the provided documentation is not considered sufficient to document reliability. For\n information on what constitutes sufficient documentation, see section 138(3) of the\n Danish Public Procurement Act.
The contracting authority shall also exclude\n economic operators, which are subject to EU sanctions in accordance with EU regulation\n 833/2014 with later amendments, Article 5k.
The tenderer is obliged to comply\n with the contracting authority’s labour clause in connection with its performance\n of the framework agreement.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: General yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: General turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual report
Suppliers\n that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure their financial and economic\n suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable documents. In such case,\n Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid grounds for not submitting\n the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Specific yearly turnoverDescription of selection criterion: Specifick turnover for the last three years. This can be documentet by the annual\n report
Suppliers that has not existed for three years, they shall ensure\n their financial and economic suitability is endorsed by submitting alternative suitable\n documents. In such case, Suppliers must indicate the circumstances they claim as valid\n grounds for not submitting the requested materials\n \n Criterion: Professional risk indemnity insuranceDescription of selection criterion: The supplier must give a copy of a professional risk indemnity insurance certificate\n for 15.000.000DKK\n \n Criterion: Relevant educational and professional qualificationsDescription of selection criterion: • The Tenderer must give information (CV’s) about the following key functions: Project\n manager, Aer-ial mission manager, Image processing and AT responsible. See tender\n material for further information\n \n Criterion: Tools, plant, or technical equipmentDescription of selection criterion: The contracting authority has set the following requirements in relation to technical\n and professional ability:
Key staff for this specific assignment
Oblique system\n has to be a digital frame camera system of the Maltese cross type with 4 oblique and\n 1 nadir camera sensor– see Annex Q.3 section 3.
The nadir camera must be a digital\n photogrammetric camera with the following four channels: Red (R), Green (G), Blue\n (B) and Near Infrared (Nir). For further details see Annex Q.3 section 3
The\n Oblique cameras must record the following three channels RGB. see Annex Q.3 section\n 3
Draft flight plan of block 81_08, including documentation from planning software\n (pdf) per AU if applicable. See attach example.
If the Supplier do not have their\n own oblique camera system, then a signed lease, rental or sale agreement with an oblique\n camera system provider, where provider guarantee the availability at the latest March\n 1st 2027, in case of winning a contract. Furthermore, a lease or rental agreement\n must last until the end of the acquisition period covering the 2027.
In\n relation to documentation of technical and professional ability the tenderer is required\n to provide:
1. Description of the Tenderers material and the technical equipment\n which will be used for carrying out the project, defined in the requirement specification\n (Annex Q.3), including
• Aircraft (number and type) chosen for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Sensor systems (serial number and type) for this tender (per\n AU if applicable)
• Processing hardware/software (number and type)
• Documentation\n of geometric resolution across the oblique images (along and across the flight direc-tion),\n resulting from the offered camera- and flight-solution. (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentation of geometric accuracy in the offered camera system (per AU if applicable)
•\n Documentations of the online tracking service that are going to be offered/used i.e.\n screen dump or other examples, where the AU is tracked - for more details see annex\n Q.3 section 2.
If the Supplier wishes to bid for two lots there has to be documentation\n for at least two AUs one for each of the two lots.
\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a)\n a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample.
It will not be required that the\n two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come\n from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained\n below:
Product Sample (Mandatory requirement)
The product-sample dataset\n must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up\n area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product.\n If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the\n differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document\n the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will\n be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain\n how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that\n production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality.
Siemens\n Star Sample (Mandatory requirement)
For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star\n may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must\n be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD\n for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems,\n such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in\n each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on\n top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832\n - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N.
Evaluation of the sample data
The SDS is evaluated\n on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the\n offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more\n the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score.\n If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account.
In case the\n supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory)\n the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed\n accordingly.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better\n registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss,\n secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions\n that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during\n data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better\n quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra\n value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score,\n as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and\n accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score.
All descriptions must contain\n QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions,\n which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues.
Data acquisitions\n must be specified by:
1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping\n purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately.\n Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External\n factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in\n front of camera system.
2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution:\n The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity\n at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during\n the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain\n information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment.\n The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods\n of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap\n to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage.\n
3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of\n LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without\n cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier\n will get 9 points, if not 1 point.
4. Past Projects: Three references must\n be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is\n a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences\n that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will\n be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as\n being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must\n be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right\n to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant\n references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able\n to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five\n (5) years.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality\n and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane\n to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher\n weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for\n in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during\n post processing.
All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific\n task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment\n or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will\n achieve a higher score.
1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes\n as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in\n a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization,\n single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in\n one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field\n data etc.
2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that\n ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete\n description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation\n is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment\n of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all\n images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and\n application.
3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule\n and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore,\n it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full\n production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 10\n \n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2\n (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described\n in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots:
• A price\n per km2 of basic areas.
The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make\n sure the offered price will work for all lots.
The supplier should be aware that\n his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight,\n image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination,\n aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in\n connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer.
All\n prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the\n winners of the ten-der.\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 30\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsAddress of the procurement documents: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of tenders: 04-12-2026 13:00 +01:00\n Duration during which the tender must remain valid: 3 Month\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n Additional buyer coverage: The lots are more less same value and size\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following\n deadlines apply to the submission of complaints:
A complaint regarding non-prequalification\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar\n days from the day following the contracting authority's dispatch of a notification\n to the candidates concerned identifying who has been selected, cf. section 171(2)\n of the Danish Public Procurement Act or section 2(1)(1) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement, where the notification is accompanied by a statement\n of reasons for the decision.
In other situations, complaints regarding procurement\n procedures must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1)\n 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union announcing that the contracting authority has concluded\n a contract. The period is calculated from the day following the day on which the notice\n was published.
2) 30 calendar days calculated from the day following the day on\n which the contracting authority has notified the tenderers concerned that a contract\n based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing\n system has been concluded, where the notification was accompanied by a statement of\n reasons for the decision.
3) six months after the contracting authority has concluded\n a framework agreement, calculated from the day following the day on which the contracting\n authority has notified the candidates and tenderers concerned, cf. section 2(2) of\n the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement or section 171(4) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day following\n the day on which the contracting authority has announced its decision, cf. section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
No later than at the time of\n submitting a complaint to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the complainant\n must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint is being submitted\n to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the complaint has been\n submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6(4) of the Act on the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement. Where the complaint has not been submitted during the\n standstill period, the complainant must also state whether suspensive effect of the\n complaint is requested, cf. section 12(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Public\n Procurement.\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n \n 8 Organisations8.1 ORG-0001Official name: Klimadatastyrelsen\n Registration number: 37284114\n Postal address: Sankt Kjelds Plads 11 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Contact point: Eskil Kjærshøj Nielsen Kjærshøj Nielsen\n \n \n Roles of this organisation:\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure\n Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents\n Organisation receiving requests to participate\n Organisation processing tenders\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-1000Official name: Comdia ApS\n Registration number: 33501404\n Postal address: Lindvedvej 71 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Fyn (DK031)\n \n Email: support@comdia.com\n \n Internet address: https://www.comdia.com/\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-1001Official name: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Registration number: 37795526\n Postal address: Danish Appeals Boards Authority, Toldboden 2 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Vestjylland (DK041)\n \n Email: klfu@naevneneshus.dk\n \n Internet address: http://www.klfu.dk\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-1002Official name: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n Registration number: 10294819\n Postal address: Carl Jacobsens Vej 35 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)\n \n \n \n Internet address: https://www.kfst.dk/\n Roles of this organisation:Organisation providing more information on the review procedures\n \n \n \n Notice informationNotice identifier/version: a0323f3a-68a4-4ee1-94ac-d44126962850 - 01\n \n Notice type: Contract or concession notice – standard regime\n Notice dispatch date: 29-10-2026 15:21 +01:00\n Languages in which this notice is officially available: English \n Notice publication number: 00757322-2026\n OJ S issue number: 212/2026\n Publication date: 02-11-2026\n \n \n","opsummeringDA":{"card":{"titel":"Digital Oblique Image Acquisition and AT 2027-2030","ordregiver":"Klimadatastyrelsen","ordregiverId":"37284114","ordregiverIdDatavasket":"37284114","publiceringsdato":"2026-11-02+01:00","cpvKode":"71000000","cpvTitel":"Arkitekt-, konstruktions-, ingeniør- og inspektionsvirksomhed","formulartype":"Konkurrencevilkår","formulartypeKode":"competition","tidsfrister":["2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00"],"alleOrdregivere":["Klimadatastyrelsen"],"anslaaetVaerdi":"40000000","anslaaetVaerdiValuta":"DKK","beskrivelse":"The Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. Agency for Climate Data (KDS), intend to establish a common oblique image dataset as a public geographical administrative basis for digital management (e-governance) in Denmark. The data set was first established in 2017 and updated in 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 using the same specification with amendments. This tender is more or less the same service, but with updated specification using the experiences from the previous five acquisitions.\n\nThe purpose of the tender is to create the necessary high-quality oblique image’s in digital form, without blurring effects (clouds, smog etc.) and with a contrast and brightness sufficient to distinguish details and objects corresponding to actual ground sample distance (GSD) of 10 cm in centre pixel of the images.\n\nThe oblique photography’s must be acquired during a timeframe during March 21st to September 21st and the tender is divided into five Lots/sub-agreements, where a Supplier can win maximum 2 Lots/sub-agreements.\n\nThe framework in 2027 is covering one acquisition period, with the possibility of a second country wide acquisi-tion if the resources are granted under the government budget for 2029.\n\nTo assist with the tendering the image quality from 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 can be observed here:\n\nhttps://skraafoto.dataforsyningen.dk/","bkSubTypeKode":"16","bkSubType":"Udbudsbekendtgørelse – det generelle direktiv, standardordningen","erAendring":false},"indholdsType":"HENTET_FRA_TED","sekundaereOrdregivere":[],"udforelsesstedNutsCode":["DK011"],"udforelsesstedSubLand":["Byen København"],"udforelsesstedLand":["Danmark"],"udforelsesstedBy":[],"tilbudsfrister":["2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00"],"intressentfrister":[],"deltagelsefrister":[],"svarfrister":[],"antalParts":0,"antalLots":5,"udbudsDokumenter":["https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629"]},"opsummeringEN":{"card":{"titel":"Digital Oblique Image Acquisition and AT 2027-2030","ordregiver":"Klimadatastyrelsen","ordregiverId":"37284114","ordregiverIdDatavasket":"37284114","publiceringsdato":"2026-11-02+01:00","cpvKode":"71000000","cpvTitel":"Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services","formulartype":"Competition","formulartypeKode":"competition","tidsfrister":["2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00"],"alleOrdregivere":["Klimadatastyrelsen"],"anslaaetVaerdi":"40000000","anslaaetVaerdiValuta":"DKK","beskrivelse":"The Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. Agency for Climate Data (KDS), intend to establish a common oblique image dataset as a public geographical administrative basis for digital management (e-governance) in Denmark. The data set was first established in 2017 and updated in 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 using the same specification with amendments. This tender is more or less the same service, but with updated specification using the experiences from the previous five acquisitions.\n\nThe purpose of the tender is to create the necessary high-quality oblique image’s in digital form, without blurring effects (clouds, smog etc.) and with a contrast and brightness sufficient to distinguish details and objects corresponding to actual ground sample distance (GSD) of 10 cm in centre pixel of the images.\n\nThe oblique photography’s must be acquired during a timeframe during March 21st to September 21st and the tender is divided into five Lots/sub-agreements, where a Supplier can win maximum 2 Lots/sub-agreements.\n\nThe framework in 2027 is covering one acquisition period, with the possibility of a second country wide acquisi-tion if the resources are granted under the government budget for 2029.\n\nTo assist with the tendering the image quality from 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 can be observed here:\n\nhttps://skraafoto.dataforsyningen.dk/","bkSubTypeKode":"16","bkSubType":"Contract notice – general directive, standard regime","erAendring":false},"indholdsType":"HENTET_FRA_TED","sekundaereOrdregivere":[],"udforelsesstedNutsCode":["DK011"],"udforelsesstedSubLand":["Byen København"],"udforelsesstedLand":["Denmark"],"udforelsesstedBy":[],"tilbudsfrister":["2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00","2026-12-04T13:00:00+01:00"],"intressentfrister":[],"deltagelsefrister":[],"svarfrister":[],"antalParts":0,"antalLots":5,"udbudsDokumenter":["https://www.comdia.com/kefm/tenderinformationshow.aspx?Id=827629"]}}