{"bekendtgoerelseNoegle":{"noticeId":{"value":"8656d166-593b-44b0-9c21-49d50b96af6f"},"noticeVersion":{"value":"01"},"noticePublicationNumber":{"value":"00699359-2024"}},"htmlDA":"\n\n \n 1 Køber1.1 KøberOfficielt navn: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark\n Køberens retlige status: Central regeringsmyndighed\n Den ordregivende myndigheds aktiviteter: Økonomiske anliggender\n \n \n 2 Procedure2.1 ProcedureTitel: Evaluation of Development Cooperation through Delegated Partnerships with the EU\n Beskrivelse: The evaluation will cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA (central\n MFA or embassies) over the ten-year period from 2014 to 2023, where the MFA is entrusted\n by the EU with the implementation of actions in indirect management. The evaluation\n will not cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA, where the MFA acts\n as delegator and the EU as the entrusted delegate. The evaluation will focus on the\n benefits, challenges, and overall relevance of the modality of delegated cooperation\n from the delegates perspective. In addition, the partner countries perspectives will\n be explored through case studies. The perspectives of the EU administration will only\n be considered insofar as they have direct implications for the use of the modality\n as seen from the perspective of the entrusted delegate and the partner countries.\n In terms of the OECD/DAC evaluation criteria, the focus is expected to be mainly on\n relevance, coherence and efficiency. In relation to the criteria of effectiveness\n and sustainability, this shall be addressed in relation to the assessment of whether\n and how the delegated cooperation as an aid modality has been conducive to achieving\n effective and sustainable results. Impact is not expected to be in focus. Due to the\n limited number of delegated cooperations between the MFA and the EU, the evaluation\n is expected to cover the entire portfolio (see approach and methodology). Additionally,\n in-depth case studies based on country visits are required for a select number of\n delegated cooperations. These case studies will encompass up to three countries -\n two in Africa and one in Asia – and are expected to include a maximum of five examples\n of delegated cooperations. To enhance the overall findings and recommendations, the\n evaluation will further incorporate insights from at least two like-minded donors.\n This will be based on a portfolio overview based on available documentation, interviews\n at the HQs of these donors and a comparison of guidelines and procedures for involvement.\n Sweden and the Netherlands are preliminary suggested for this comparison, but the\n final selection will be made in the inception phase. Further, the evaluation will\n incorporate experience and insights from the Practitioners’ Network for European Development\n Cooperation, led by Expertise France, based on document review and interviews. Overall,\n in terms of travel then, the evaluation shall plan with visits to three partner countries,\n two in Africa and one in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase;\n visits to MFA HQ in Copenhagen; visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in\n delegated cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and\n a visit to the EU administration in Brussels. Interviews with stakeholders in other\n partner countries, likeminded donors etc. are also expected, and may be undertaken\n remotely. To allow for a comparison of the use of delegated cooperation by Denmark\n and other EU member countries, the evaluation will also establish an overview of all\n EU funds for Official Development Assistance (ODA) under indirect management over\n the period, categorised by year and entrusted country/organisation, based on available\n information.\n Identifikator for proceduren: 9754f740-eb91-4a6f-b665-535ce8c5e03d\n Tidligere bekendtgørelse: 1e7baee3-d437-4714-8a5d-2dcedebd31a6-01\n Intern identifikator: 24-18288\n Udbudsprocedure: Begrænset\n Proceduren er en hasteprocedure: nej\n 2.1.1 FormålKontraktens art: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassificering (cpv): 79419000 Evalueringsrådgivningstjenester\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 75211200 Tjenester vedrørende økonomisk hjælp til udlandet\n \n 2.1.2 UdførelsesstedLandespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The evaluation will require meetings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark\n in Copenhagen as well as a final workshop in Copenhagen.\n \n 2.1.2 UdførelsesstedHvor som helst inden for EØS\n Yderligere oplysninger: The evaluation will require visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in delegated\n cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and a visit to\n the EU administration in Brussels.\n \n 2.1.2 Udførelsessted\n Yderligere oplysninger: The evaluation will require visits to three partner countries, two in Africa and one\n in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase.\n \n 2.1.3 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 2.900.000 Dansk krone\n \n 2.1.4 Generelle oplysningerYderligere oplysninger: The procurement procedure has been cancelled as it has become apparent to the contracting\n authority that certain aspects of the requirements in the procurement documents need\n clarification and refinement, particularly regarding the specific competencies and\n expertise required for the evaluation. Therefore, the contracting authority will amend\n the procurement documents and publish a new procurement procedure which will allow\n the contracting authority to more effectively communicate the necessary qualifications,\n increase competition, and ensure that tenders fully address the evaluation’s requirements.\n This contract has not been divided into lots, cf. section II.1.6), due to market and\n economic considerations. Economic operators will not receive remuneration for their\n participation in the procedure.\n \n \n https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/10 - The procurement procedure is governed by Danish law and the rules applicable hereunder,\n specifically the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n \n \n \n 5 Delkontrakt5.1 Teknisk ID for partiet: LOT-0000Titel: Evaluation of Development Cooperation through Delegated Partnerships with the EU\n Beskrivelse: The evaluation will cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA (central\n MFA or embassies) over the ten-year period from 2014 to 2023, where the MFA is entrusted\n by the EU with the implementation of actions in indirect management. The evaluation\n will not cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA, where the MFA acts\n as delegator and the EU as the entrusted delegate. The evaluation will focus on the\n benefits, challenges, and overall relevance of the modality of delegated cooperation\n from the delegates perspective. In addition, the partner countries perspectives will\n be explored through case studies. The perspectives of the EU administration will only\n be considered insofar as they have direct implications for the use of the modality\n as seen from the perspective of the entrusted delegate and the partner countries.\n In terms of the OECD/DAC evaluation criteria, the focus is expected to be mainly on\n relevance, coherence and efficiency. In relation to the criteria of effectiveness\n and sustainability, this shall be addressed in relation to the assessment of whether\n and how the delegated cooperation as an aid modality has been conducive to achieving\n effective and sustainable results. Impact is not expected to be in focus. Due to the\n limited number of delegated cooperations between the MFA and the EU, the evaluation\n is expected to cover the entire portfolio (see approach and methodology). Additionally,\n in-depth case studies based on country visits are required for a select number of\n delegated cooperations. These case studies will encompass up to three countries -\n two in Africa and one in Asia – and are expected to include a maximum of five examples\n of delegated cooperations. To enhance the overall findings and recommendations, the\n evaluation will further incorporate insights from at least two like-minded donors.\n This will be based on a portfolio overview based on available documentation, interviews\n at the HQs of these donors and a comparison of guidelines and procedures for involvement.\n Sweden and the Netherlands are preliminary suggested for this comparison, but the\n final selection will be made in the inception phase. Further, the evaluation will\n incorporate experience and insights from the Practitioners’ Network for European Development\n Cooperation, led by Expertise France, based on document review and interviews. Overall,\n in terms of travel then, the evaluation shall plan with visits to three partner countries,\n two in Africa and one in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase;\n visits to MFA HQ in Copenhagen; visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in\n delegated cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and\n a visit to the EU administration in Brussels. Interviews with stakeholders in other\n partner countries, likeminded donors etc. are also expected, and may be undertaken\n remotely. To allow for a comparison of the use of delegated cooperation by Denmark\n and other EU member countries, the evaluation will also establish an overview of all\n EU funds for Official Development Assistance (ODA) under indirect management over\n the period, categorised by year and entrusted country/organisation, based on available\n information.\n Intern identifikator: 24-18288\n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens art: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassificering (cpv): 79419000 Evalueringsrådgivningstjenester\n Yderligere klassificering (cpv): 75211200 Tjenester vedrørende økonomisk hjælp til udlandet\n Valgmuligheder:Beskrivelse af optioner: Sweden may potentially take on a more active role in the evaluation. If this occurs,\n the evaluation will need to assess the entire Swedish portfolio of delegated cooperation\n with the EU in a more comprehensive manner, mirroring the approach used for the Danish\n portfolio, and evaluation questions will apply to both the Swedish and the Danish\n experiences. However, a more active role for Sweden will not increase the number of\n in-country visits or the number of case studies to be conducted (but rather entails\n that the selection of countries and cases will be done so as to include both examples\n of Danish and Swedish delegated cooperation). The additional services and deliveries\n related to Sweden’s more comprehensive involvement shall be performed by the designated\n Key Staff in accordance with the agreed rates. To accommodate this possibility, a\n lump sum is allocated in the budget. The lump sum is set aside for the additional\n activities foreseen to be relevant, such as i.a. including Sweden in a survey, more\n interviews and reporting. The decision regarding Sweden’s involvement will be made\n before the evaluation enters the inception phase. The option to include the additional\n services and deliveries shall become effective on the date of the Client's written\n approval of the description of the additional services and work plan.\n \n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedLandespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The evaluation will require meetings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark\n in Copenhagen as well as a final workshop in Copenhagen.\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedHvor som helst inden for EØS\n Yderligere oplysninger: The evaluation will require visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in delegated\n cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and a visit to\n the EU administration in Brussels.\n \n 5.1.2 Udførelsessted\n Yderligere oplysninger: The evaluation will require visits to three partner countries, two in Africa and one\n in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase.\n \n 5.1.3 Anslået varighed\n Varigheds slutdato: 30-11-2025\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 2.900.000 Dansk krone\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerIndkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja\n Yderligere oplysninger: The procurement procedure has been cancelled as it has become apparent to the contracting\n authority that certain aspects of the requirements in the procurement documents need\n clarification and refinement, particularly regarding the specific competencies and\n expertise required for the evaluation. Therefore, the contracting authority will amend\n the procurement documents and publish a new procurement procedure which will allow\n the contracting authority to more effectively communicate the necessary qualifications,\n increase competition, and ensure that tenders fully address the evaluation’s requirements.\n This contract has not been divided into lots, cf. section II.1.6), due to market and\n economic considerations. Economic operators will not receive remuneration for their\n participation in the procedure.\n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n Navn: Adequacy of Methodology and Work Plan\n Beskrivelse: Includes the following sub-criteria: Technical Approach and Methodology; Work plan;\n Organisation; and Quality Assurance and BIMP. Please refer to the procurement document\n Criteria and Method of Evaluation for more information and the weight of the sub-criteria.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 36\n \n Kriterium:\n Navn: Qualifications and Competence of Key Staff\n Beskrivelse: The contracting authority will evaluate qualifications and competence of the Key Staff.\n Please refer to the procurement document Criteria and Method of Evaluation for more\n information and the weight of sub-criteria.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 54\n \n Kriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: The contracting authority will evaluate the price based on the contract price. Please\n refer to the procurement document Criteria and Method of Evaluation for more information.\n Vægtning (procentdel, præcis): 10\n \n \n 5.1.12 UdbudsvilkårOplysninger om undersøgelsesfrister: Actions regarding requests to participate and selection must be submitted within 20\n calendar days from the day after the contracting authority has notified the economic\n operators of the decisions regarding selection. Other actions regarding the procedure\n (e.g. decisions regarding award of contract) must be submitted within 45 calendar\n days from the day after the publication of a contract award notice in the Official\n Journal of the EU. Complaint guidelines (in English) can be found at: https://naevneneshus.dk/media/9802/complaint-guidelines.pdf\n \n 5.1.15 Teknikker\n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA\n \n \n \n 6 Resultater6.1 Resultat delkontrakt-ID: LOT-0000Der er ikke udvalgt en vinder, og konkurrencen er afsluttet.\n Begrundelsen for ikke at udvælge en vinder: Afgørelse truffet af køber på grund af ændrede behov\n 6.1.4 Statistiske oplysningerModtagne tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse:Type modtagne indgivelser: Ansøgning om deltagelseAntal modtagne tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse: 3\n \n Type modtagne indgivelser: TilbudAntal modtagne tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse: 2\n \n \n \n \n \n 8 Organisationer8.1 ORG-0001Officielt navn: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark\n Registreringsnummer: 43271911\n Afdeling: Department for Evaluation, Learning and Quality (LEARNING)\n Postadresse: Asiatisk Plads 2 \n \n \n Landespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Kontaktpunkt: Eva Broegaard\n \n \n Internetadresse: https://um.dk/en/danida\n Denne organisations roller:\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0002Officielt navn: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Registreringsnummer: 37795526\n \n \n \n Landespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Vestjylland (DK041)\n \n Kontaktpunkt: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n E-mail: klfu@naevneneshus.dk\n \n Internetadresse: https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/\n Adresse til udveksling af oplysninger (URL): https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/\n Denne organisations roller:Organisation med ansvar for klager\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0003Officielt navn: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Registreringsnummer: 10294819\n Postadresse: Carl Jacobsens Vej 35 \n \n \n Landespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Kontaktpunkt: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n \n \n Internetadresse: https://www.kfst.dk\n Adresse til udveksling af oplysninger (URL): https://www.kfst.dk\n Denne organisations roller:Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0004Officielt navn: Mercell Holding ASA\n Registreringsnummer: 980921565\n Postadresse: Askekroken 11 \n \n \n Landespecifik underafdeling (NUTS): Oslo (NO081)\n \n \n E-mail: publication@mercell.com\n \n \n Internetadresse: http://mercell.com/\n Denne organisations roller:\n \n \n \n 11 Oplysninger om bekendtgørelsen11.1 Oplysninger om bekendtgørelsenIdentifikator for bekendtgørelsen: 8656d166-593b-44b0-9c21-49d50b96af6f - 01\n \n Bekendtgørelsestype: Bekendtgørelse om indgåede kontrakter eller koncessionstildeling – standardordningen\n Afsendelsesdato for bekendtgørelsen: 15-11-2024 08:30 +00:00\n Dato for afsendelse af bekendtgørelse (eSender): 15-11-2024 08:35 +00:00\n Sprog, som denne bekendtgørelse er officielt tilgængelig på: engelsk \n \n 11.2 Oplysninger om offentliggørelsenBekendtgørelsesnummer: 00699359-2024\n \n Offentliggørelsesdato: 18-11-2024\n \n \n \n","htmlEN":"\n\n \n 1 Buyer1.1 BuyerOfficial name: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark\n Legal type of the buyer: Central government authority\n Activity of the contracting authority: Economic affairs\n \n \n 2 Procedure2.1 ProcedureTitle: Evaluation of Development Cooperation through Delegated Partnerships with the EU\n Description: The evaluation will cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA (central\n MFA or embassies) over the ten-year period from 2014 to 2023, where the MFA is entrusted\n by the EU with the implementation of actions in indirect management. The evaluation\n will not cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA, where the MFA acts\n as delegator and the EU as the entrusted delegate. The evaluation will focus on the\n benefits, challenges, and overall relevance of the modality of delegated cooperation\n from the delegates perspective. In addition, the partner countries perspectives will\n be explored through case studies. The perspectives of the EU administration will only\n be considered insofar as they have direct implications for the use of the modality\n as seen from the perspective of the entrusted delegate and the partner countries.\n In terms of the OECD/DAC evaluation criteria, the focus is expected to be mainly on\n relevance, coherence and efficiency. In relation to the criteria of effectiveness\n and sustainability, this shall be addressed in relation to the assessment of whether\n and how the delegated cooperation as an aid modality has been conducive to achieving\n effective and sustainable results. Impact is not expected to be in focus. Due to the\n limited number of delegated cooperations between the MFA and the EU, the evaluation\n is expected to cover the entire portfolio (see approach and methodology). Additionally,\n in-depth case studies based on country visits are required for a select number of\n delegated cooperations. These case studies will encompass up to three countries -\n two in Africa and one in Asia – and are expected to include a maximum of five examples\n of delegated cooperations. To enhance the overall findings and recommendations, the\n evaluation will further incorporate insights from at least two like-minded donors.\n This will be based on a portfolio overview based on available documentation, interviews\n at the HQs of these donors and a comparison of guidelines and procedures for involvement.\n Sweden and the Netherlands are preliminary suggested for this comparison, but the\n final selection will be made in the inception phase. Further, the evaluation will\n incorporate experience and insights from the Practitioners’ Network for European Development\n Cooperation, led by Expertise France, based on document review and interviews. Overall,\n in terms of travel then, the evaluation shall plan with visits to three partner countries,\n two in Africa and one in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase;\n visits to MFA HQ in Copenhagen; visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in\n delegated cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and\n a visit to the EU administration in Brussels. Interviews with stakeholders in other\n partner countries, likeminded donors etc. are also expected, and may be undertaken\n remotely. To allow for a comparison of the use of delegated cooperation by Denmark\n and other EU member countries, the evaluation will also establish an overview of all\n EU funds for Official Development Assistance (ODA) under indirect management over\n the period, categorised by year and entrusted country/organisation, based on available\n information.\n Procedure identifier: 9754f740-eb91-4a6f-b665-535ce8c5e03d\n Previous notice: 1e7baee3-d437-4714-8a5d-2dcedebd31a6-01\n Internal identifier: 24-18288\n Type of procedure: Restricted\n The procedure is accelerated: no\n 2.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 79419000 Evaluation consultancy services\n Additional classification (cpv): 75211200 Foreign economic-aid-related services\n \n 2.1.2 Place of performanceCountry subdivision (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Additional information: The evaluation will require meetings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark\n in Copenhagen as well as a final workshop in Copenhagen.\n \n 2.1.2 Place of performanceAnywhere in the European Economic Area\n Additional information: The evaluation will require visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in delegated\n cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and a visit to\n the EU administration in Brussels.\n \n 2.1.2 Place of performance\n Additional information: The evaluation will require visits to three partner countries, two in Africa and one\n in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase.\n \n 2.1.3 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 2.900.000 Danish krone\n \n 2.1.4 General informationAdditional information: The procurement procedure has been cancelled as it has become apparent to the contracting\n authority that certain aspects of the requirements in the procurement documents need\n clarification and refinement, particularly regarding the specific competencies and\n expertise required for the evaluation. Therefore, the contracting authority will amend\n the procurement documents and publish a new procurement procedure which will allow\n the contracting authority to more effectively communicate the necessary qualifications,\n increase competition, and ensure that tenders fully address the evaluation’s requirements.\n This contract has not been divided into lots, cf. section II.1.6), due to market and\n economic considerations. Economic operators will not receive remuneration for their\n participation in the procedure.\n \n \n https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/10 - The procurement procedure is governed by Danish law and the rules applicable hereunder,\n specifically the Danish Public Procurement Act.\n \n \n \n 5 Lot5.1 Lot technical ID: LOT-0000Title: Evaluation of Development Cooperation through Delegated Partnerships with the EU\n Description: The evaluation will cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA (central\n MFA or embassies) over the ten-year period from 2014 to 2023, where the MFA is entrusted\n by the EU with the implementation of actions in indirect management. The evaluation\n will not cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA, where the MFA acts\n as delegator and the EU as the entrusted delegate. The evaluation will focus on the\n benefits, challenges, and overall relevance of the modality of delegated cooperation\n from the delegates perspective. In addition, the partner countries perspectives will\n be explored through case studies. The perspectives of the EU administration will only\n be considered insofar as they have direct implications for the use of the modality\n as seen from the perspective of the entrusted delegate and the partner countries.\n In terms of the OECD/DAC evaluation criteria, the focus is expected to be mainly on\n relevance, coherence and efficiency. In relation to the criteria of effectiveness\n and sustainability, this shall be addressed in relation to the assessment of whether\n and how the delegated cooperation as an aid modality has been conducive to achieving\n effective and sustainable results. Impact is not expected to be in focus. Due to the\n limited number of delegated cooperations between the MFA and the EU, the evaluation\n is expected to cover the entire portfolio (see approach and methodology). Additionally,\n in-depth case studies based on country visits are required for a select number of\n delegated cooperations. These case studies will encompass up to three countries -\n two in Africa and one in Asia – and are expected to include a maximum of five examples\n of delegated cooperations. To enhance the overall findings and recommendations, the\n evaluation will further incorporate insights from at least two like-minded donors.\n This will be based on a portfolio overview based on available documentation, interviews\n at the HQs of these donors and a comparison of guidelines and procedures for involvement.\n Sweden and the Netherlands are preliminary suggested for this comparison, but the\n final selection will be made in the inception phase. Further, the evaluation will\n incorporate experience and insights from the Practitioners’ Network for European Development\n Cooperation, led by Expertise France, based on document review and interviews. Overall,\n in terms of travel then, the evaluation shall plan with visits to three partner countries,\n two in Africa and one in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase;\n visits to MFA HQ in Copenhagen; visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in\n delegated cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and\n a visit to the EU administration in Brussels. Interviews with stakeholders in other\n partner countries, likeminded donors etc. are also expected, and may be undertaken\n remotely. To allow for a comparison of the use of delegated cooperation by Denmark\n and other EU member countries, the evaluation will also establish an overview of all\n EU funds for Official Development Assistance (ODA) under indirect management over\n the period, categorised by year and entrusted country/organisation, based on available\n information.\n Internal identifier: 24-18288\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 79419000 Evaluation consultancy services\n Additional classification (cpv): 75211200 Foreign economic-aid-related services\n Options:Description of the options: Sweden may potentially take on a more active role in the evaluation. If this occurs,\n the evaluation will need to assess the entire Swedish portfolio of delegated cooperation\n with the EU in a more comprehensive manner, mirroring the approach used for the Danish\n portfolio, and evaluation questions will apply to both the Swedish and the Danish\n experiences. However, a more active role for Sweden will not increase the number of\n in-country visits or the number of case studies to be conducted (but rather entails\n that the selection of countries and cases will be done so as to include both examples\n of Danish and Swedish delegated cooperation). The additional services and deliveries\n related to Sweden’s more comprehensive involvement shall be performed by the designated\n Key Staff in accordance with the agreed rates. To accommodate this possibility, a\n lump sum is allocated in the budget. The lump sum is set aside for the additional\n activities foreseen to be relevant, such as i.a. including Sweden in a survey, more\n interviews and reporting. The decision regarding Sweden’s involvement will be made\n before the evaluation enters the inception phase. The option to include the additional\n services and deliveries shall become effective on the date of the Client's written\n approval of the description of the additional services and work plan.\n \n \n 5.1.2 Place of performanceCountry subdivision (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Additional information: The evaluation will require meetings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark\n in Copenhagen as well as a final workshop in Copenhagen.\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performanceAnywhere in the European Economic Area\n Additional information: The evaluation will require visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in delegated\n cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and a visit to\n the EU administration in Brussels.\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performance\n Additional information: The evaluation will require visits to three partner countries, two in Africa and one\n in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase.\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n Duration end date: 30-11-2025\n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 2.900.000 Danish krone\n \n 5.1.6 General informationProcurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes\n Additional information: The procurement procedure has been cancelled as it has become apparent to the contracting\n authority that certain aspects of the requirements in the procurement documents need\n clarification and refinement, particularly regarding the specific competencies and\n expertise required for the evaluation. Therefore, the contracting authority will amend\n the procurement documents and publish a new procurement procedure which will allow\n the contracting authority to more effectively communicate the necessary qualifications,\n increase competition, and ensure that tenders fully address the evaluation’s requirements.\n This contract has not been divided into lots, cf. section II.1.6), due to market and\n economic considerations. Economic operators will not receive remuneration for their\n participation in the procedure.\n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n Name: Adequacy of Methodology and Work Plan\n Description: Includes the following sub-criteria: Technical Approach and Methodology; Work plan;\n Organisation; and Quality Assurance and BIMP. Please refer to the procurement document\n Criteria and Method of Evaluation for more information and the weight of the sub-criteria.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 36\n \n Criterion:\n Name: Qualifications and Competence of Key Staff\n Description: The contracting authority will evaluate qualifications and competence of the Key Staff.\n Please refer to the procurement document Criteria and Method of Evaluation for more\n information and the weight of sub-criteria.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 54\n \n Criterion:\n \n Description: The contracting authority will evaluate the price based on the contract price. Please\n refer to the procurement document Criteria and Method of Evaluation for more information.\n Weight (percentage, exact): 10\n \n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementInformation about review deadlines: Actions regarding requests to participate and selection must be submitted within 20\n calendar days from the day after the contracting authority has notified the economic\n operators of the decisions regarding selection. Other actions regarding the procedure\n (e.g. decisions regarding award of contract) must be submitted within 45 calendar\n days from the day after the publication of a contract award notice in the Official\n Journal of the EU. Complaint guidelines (in English) can be found at: https://naevneneshus.dk/media/9802/complaint-guidelines.pdf\n \n 5.1.15 Techniques\n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA\n \n \n \n 6 Results6.1 Result lot ldentifier: LOT-0000No winner was chosen and the competition is closed.\n The reason why a winner was not chosen: Decision of the buyer, because of a change in needs\n 6.1.4 Statistical informationReceived tenders or requests to participate:Type of received submissions: Requests to participateNumber of tenders or requests to participate received: 3\n \n Type of received submissions: TendersNumber of tenders or requests to participate received: 2\n \n \n \n \n \n 8 Organisations8.1 ORG-0001Official name: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark\n Registration number: 43271911\n Department: Department for Evaluation, Learning and Quality (LEARNING)\n Postal address: Asiatisk Plads 2 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Contact point: Eva Broegaard\n \n \n Internet address: https://um.dk/en/danida\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0002Official name: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Registration number: 37795526\n Postal address: Toldboden 2 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Vestjylland (DK041)\n \n Contact point: Klagenævnet for Udbud\n Email: klfu@naevneneshus.dk\n \n Internet address: https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/\n Information exchange endpoint (URL): https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0003Official name: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n Registration number: 10294819\n Postal address: Carl Jacobsens Vej 35 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n Contact point: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen\n \n \n Internet address: https://www.kfst.dk\n Information exchange endpoint (URL): https://www.kfst.dk\n Roles of this organisation:Organisation providing more information on the review procedures\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0004Official name: Mercell Holding ASA\n Registration number: 980921565\n Postal address: Askekroken 11 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Oslo (NO081)\n \n \n Email: publication@mercell.com\n \n \n Internet address: http://mercell.com/\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n \n 11 Notice information11.1 Notice informationNotice identifier/version: 8656d166-593b-44b0-9c21-49d50b96af6f - 01\n \n Notice type: Contract or concession award notice – standard regime\n Notice dispatch date: 15-11-2024 08:30 +00:00\n Notice dispatch date (eSender): 15-11-2024 08:35 +00:00\n Languages in which this notice is officially available: English \n \n 11.2 Publication informationNotice publication number: 00699359-2024\n OJ S issue number: 224/2024\n Publication date: 18-11-2024\n \n \n \n","opsummeringDA":{"card":{"titel":"Evaluation of Development Cooperation through Delegated Partnerships with the EU","ordregiver":"Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark","ordregiverId":"43271911","ordregiverIdDatavasket":"43271911","publiceringsdato":"2024-11-18+01:00","cpvKode":"79419000","cpvTitel":"Evalueringsrådgivningstjenester","formulartype":"Resultater","formulartypeKode":"result","tidsfrister":[],"alleOrdregivere":["Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark"],"anslaaetVaerdi":"2900000","anslaaetVaerdiValuta":"DKK","beskrivelse":"The evaluation will cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA (central MFA or embassies) over the ten-year period from 2014 to 2023, where the MFA is entrusted by the EU with the implementation of actions in indirect management. The evaluation will not cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA, where the MFA acts as delegator and the EU as the entrusted delegate. The evaluation will focus on the benefits, challenges, and overall relevance of the modality of delegated cooperation from the delegates perspective. In addition, the partner countries perspectives will be explored through case studies. The perspectives of the EU administration will only be considered insofar as they have direct implications for the use of the modality as seen from the perspective of the entrusted delegate and the partner countries. In terms of the OECD/DAC evaluation criteria, the focus is expected to be mainly on relevance, coherence and efficiency. In relation to the criteria of effectiveness and sustainability, this shall be addressed in relation to the assessment of whether and how the delegated cooperation as an aid modality has been conducive to achieving effective and sustainable results. Impact is not expected to be in focus. Due to the limited number of delegated cooperations between the MFA and the EU, the evaluation is expected to cover the entire portfolio (see approach and methodology). Additionally, in-depth case studies based on country visits are required for a select number of delegated cooperations. These case studies will encompass up to three countries - two in Africa and one in Asia – and are expected to include a maximum of five examples of delegated cooperations. To enhance the overall findings and recommendations, the evaluation will further incorporate insights from at least two like-minded donors. This will be based on a portfolio overview based on available documentation, interviews at the HQs of these donors and a comparison of guidelines and procedures for involvement. Sweden and the Netherlands are preliminary suggested for this comparison, but the final selection will be made in the inception phase. Further, the evaluation will incorporate experience and insights from the Practitioners’ Network for European Development Cooperation, led by Expertise France, based on document review and interviews. Overall, in terms of travel then, the evaluation shall plan with visits to three partner countries, two in Africa and one in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase; visits to MFA HQ in Copenhagen; visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in delegated cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and a visit to the EU administration in Brussels. Interviews with stakeholders in other partner countries, likeminded donors etc. are also expected, and may be undertaken remotely. To allow for a comparison of the use of delegated cooperation by Denmark and other EU member countries, the evaluation will also establish an overview of all EU funds for Official Development Assistance (ODA) under indirect management over the period, categorised by year and entrusted country/organisation, based on available information.","bkSubTypeKode":"29","bkSubType":"Bekendtgørelse om indgåede kontrakter – det generelle direktiv, standardordningen","erAendring":false},"indholdsType":"HENTET_FRA_TED","sekundaereOrdregivere":[],"udforelsesstedNutsCode":["DK011"],"udforelsesstedSubLand":["Byen København"],"udforelsesstedLand":["Danmark"],"udforelsesstedBy":[],"tilbudsfrister":[],"intressentfrister":[],"deltagelsefrister":[],"antalParts":0,"antalLots":1,"udbudsDokumenter":[]},"opsummeringEN":{"card":{"titel":"Evaluation of Development Cooperation through Delegated Partnerships with the EU","ordregiver":"Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark","ordregiverId":"43271911","ordregiverIdDatavasket":"43271911","publiceringsdato":"2024-11-18+01:00","cpvKode":"79419000","cpvTitel":"Evaluation consultancy services","formulartype":"Result","formulartypeKode":"result","tidsfrister":[],"alleOrdregivere":["Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark"],"anslaaetVaerdi":"2900000","anslaaetVaerdiValuta":"DKK","beskrivelse":"The evaluation will cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA (central MFA or embassies) over the ten-year period from 2014 to 2023, where the MFA is entrusted by the EU with the implementation of actions in indirect management. The evaluation will not cover delegated cooperation between the EU and the MFA, where the MFA acts as delegator and the EU as the entrusted delegate. The evaluation will focus on the benefits, challenges, and overall relevance of the modality of delegated cooperation from the delegates perspective. In addition, the partner countries perspectives will be explored through case studies. The perspectives of the EU administration will only be considered insofar as they have direct implications for the use of the modality as seen from the perspective of the entrusted delegate and the partner countries. In terms of the OECD/DAC evaluation criteria, the focus is expected to be mainly on relevance, coherence and efficiency. In relation to the criteria of effectiveness and sustainability, this shall be addressed in relation to the assessment of whether and how the delegated cooperation as an aid modality has been conducive to achieving effective and sustainable results. Impact is not expected to be in focus. Due to the limited number of delegated cooperations between the MFA and the EU, the evaluation is expected to cover the entire portfolio (see approach and methodology). Additionally, in-depth case studies based on country visits are required for a select number of delegated cooperations. These case studies will encompass up to three countries - two in Africa and one in Asia – and are expected to include a maximum of five examples of delegated cooperations. To enhance the overall findings and recommendations, the evaluation will further incorporate insights from at least two like-minded donors. This will be based on a portfolio overview based on available documentation, interviews at the HQs of these donors and a comparison of guidelines and procedures for involvement. Sweden and the Netherlands are preliminary suggested for this comparison, but the final selection will be made in the inception phase. Further, the evaluation will incorporate experience and insights from the Practitioners’ Network for European Development Cooperation, led by Expertise France, based on document review and interviews. Overall, in terms of travel then, the evaluation shall plan with visits to three partner countries, two in Africa and one in Asia, to be finally selected during the inception phase; visits to MFA HQ in Copenhagen; visits to HQ of two like-minded donors involved in delegated cooperation with the EU (expected to be Sweden and the Netherlands) and a visit to the EU administration in Brussels. Interviews with stakeholders in other partner countries, likeminded donors etc. are also expected, and may be undertaken remotely. To allow for a comparison of the use of delegated cooperation by Denmark and other EU member countries, the evaluation will also establish an overview of all EU funds for Official Development Assistance (ODA) under indirect management over the period, categorised by year and entrusted country/organisation, based on available information.","bkSubTypeKode":"29","bkSubType":"Contract award notice – general directive, standard regime","erAendring":false},"indholdsType":"HENTET_FRA_TED","sekundaereOrdregivere":[],"udforelsesstedNutsCode":["DK011"],"udforelsesstedSubLand":["Byen København"],"udforelsesstedLand":["Denmark"],"udforelsesstedBy":[],"tilbudsfrister":[],"intressentfrister":[],"deltagelsefrister":[],"antalParts":0,"antalLots":1,"udbudsDokumenter":[]}}