2 Procedure

2.1 Procedure

Titel: New Simulators for S-train drivers

Beskrivelse: The scope of the Contract is to provide a new, full-stack Solution regarding Desktop\n simulators for S-train drivers for DSB to implement in the S-train driver Education\n Program. The Solution is expected to operate until the new S-trains (driverless) have\n been implemented, including a period of mixed traffic. However, the scope of this\n Contract is only the education of drivers for the current S-train type.

The\n new Desktop Simulator Solution is to be used to train new S-train drivers in basic\n Education, as well as yearly follow-up training for all S-train drivers. The Simulated\n Environment of the Solution shall prioritize functional fidelity and be able to simulate\n part of the infrastructure (as Simulated Train Front View), parts of the train (as\n Simulated Control and Instrument Panel) and parts of the training material (as Simulated\n Training and Exercise Scenarios) with the functional and physical fidelity defined\n in appendix 3, Requirement specification. The Solution shall also support DSB’s creation\n of own Simulated Training Exercises and Scenarios.

The Solution should\n cover the development of a full-stack Solution of Software and Hardware in collaboration\n with the Customer, possibilities for Further Development, as well as the Support and\n Maintenance of the Solution and related Services for the duration of the Contract\n period.

DSB aims at implementing the new Solution in the DSB Education\n Program for courses starting by April 2027. To achieve this, DSB aims for (Partial)\n Delivery of the required Solution early 2027 which at least covers certain prioritized\n requirements (see Appendix A, C, 1 and 3), depending on the tenderer’s capacity. The\n plan and scope of the tender is informed by previous market dialogue (see prior information\n notice). DSB is open to different delivery models, simulation methods and timelines\n as reflected in the tender material (cf. appendix 1 and 3) and tender procedure.

Identifikator for proceduren: e5ae55c3-4b51-47c3-bfbb-1c49bab10a7a

Intern ID: A-25354

Udbudsprocedure: Udbud med forhandling/indkaldelse af tilbud med forudgående offentliggørelse

Proceduren er en hasteprocedure: nej

Hovedpunkterne i proceduren: 3 applicants are prequalified to submit tendersA negotiated tender is carried out,\n cf. the tender specifications. The contracting authority will not pay any participation\n fees to the tenderers.

After receiving initial tenders, the contracting\n authority shall hold individual negotiation meetings with all tenderers who have submitted\n an initial tender in due time. The negotiations shall be conducted in accordance with\n the principle of equal treatment, and all tenderers shall be given the same time for\n negotiations with the contracting authority.

In relation to the negotiations,\n DSB does not consider the following aspects to be fundamental elements pursuant to\n the Public Procurement Act (reference), which implies that DSB reserves the right\n to discuss these aspects during negotiations and, if necessary, amend the material\n on that basis:
- Scope and number of priority requirements (market ‘P1’, cf. Appendix\n 3)
- Stated allocation of DSB's estimated resources (cf. Appendix 14)
- Subdivision\n of Support & Maintenance into Hardware and Software (cf. Appendices 7 and 10.a)
-\n Scope and warranties in regard to Support and Maintenance (see Appendices 7 and 10a)
-\n Choice of price regulation index (see Appendix 10)

The negotiation process\n is described in more detail in the tender conditions.

2.1.1 Formål

Kontraktens hovedformål: Varer

Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser

Primær klassifikation (cpv): 34152000 Øvelsessimulatorer

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 30230000 Computerrelateret udstyr

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 34943000 Togovervågningssystem

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 48931000 Programpakke til uddannelsesformål

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 80000000 Uddannelse og undervisning

2.1.2 Udførelsessted

Postadresse: Telegade 2

By: Taastrup

Postnummer: 2630

Landsdel (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Land: Danmark

2.1.3 Værdi

Anslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 3.400.000 Euro

2.1.4 Generelle oplysninger

Yderligere oplysninger: Participation in the tender can only take place electronically via the Contracting\n Entity's electronic tendering system. To access the tender material, the applicant\n must be registered or register as a user. If the application contains multiple versions\n of the same document, the latest uploaded version will be the valid one. All communication\n related to the tender procedure, including questions and answers, must take place\n via the electronic tendering system.

The Contracting Entity prefers that\n questions regarding prequalification be submitted no later than 06.10.2025, at 12.00.\n Questions submitted after this date will be answered if they are received in time\n for the Contracting Entity to obtain the necessary information and provide answers\n no later than six days before the application deadline. Questions received later than\n six days before the deadline cannot be expected to be answered. Interested parties\n are advised to stay informed via the electronic tendering system.

If the\n applicant experiences problems with the system, support can be contacted via email\n at dksupport@eu-supply.com or by phone (+45-7020 8014).

The applicant must\n submit an ESPD as its application as preliminary proof of the conditions mentioned\n in Section 148, paragraph 1, numbers 1-3 of the Public Procurement Act, cf. the regulation\n on procedures for entering into contracts within water and energy supply, transport,\n and postal services Section 11. It is not necessary for the applicant to sign its\n ESPD document.

If the applicant is a consortium then the applicant must\n submit a consortium declaration. In the case of a consortium, a separate ESPD must\n be submitted for each participating economic operator. If the applicant is a consortium,\n each participant's ESPD document must be signed by the respective participant. It\n is not necessary for the leading applicant submitting the application to sign its\n ESPD document. If the applicant relies on the capacity of other entities, an ESPD\n must be submitted for each entity on which it relies, and the ESPD document must be\n signed by the supporting entity. The applicant must also submit a support declaration\n in which the entity or entities on which the applicant relies declare to be jointly\n and severally liable with the applicant if awarded the contract. The template is attached\n as an appendix to the tender conditions. Before the award decision, the tenderer to\n whom the Contracting Entity intends to award the contract must provide documentation\n for the information given in the ESPD in accordance with Sections 151 and 152, paragraph\n 3 of the Public Procurement Act, cf. the implementation regulation Section 11. This\n documentation will consist of a Service Certificate \"Serviceattest\" (issued no earlier\n than six months before the tender deadline) and annual accounts/auditor's statement\n for Danish tenderers, cf. the tender conditions. Equivalent documentation will be\n provided for foreign tenderers. If the application is submitted by a consortium, a\n correctly completed consortium declaration must also be submitted for the consortium\n as a whole. If the applicant relies on the economic and financial or technical and\n professional capacity of supporting entities, the applicant must also submit a correctly\n completed support declaration in which the supporting entity/entities legally commit\n to making their resources available. In the event of changes to the composition of\n the tenderer, the rules in Section 147 of the Public Procurement Act apply in full.
\n
The Contracting Entity's estimate of the Contracts' value is based on the Contracting\n Entity's expectation of the offered prices for initial development and implementation,\n yearly support and maintenance of software and hardware, options as well as estimated\n number of services-as-per-hour for the entire Contract period, including price adjustments.
\n
The estimated contract value represents DSB's budget. If the winning tender is\n significantly above the expected budget in relation to development, support and maintenance\n of the solution, corresponding to an estimated EUR 1,75 million (approx. DKK 13 million),\n there is a risk that DSB may decide to cancel the tender.

The Contracting\n Entity may request applicants to supplement, clarify, or complete the application\n in accordance with Article 76, number 4 of the Utilities Directive if applications\n or tenders do not meet the formal requirements of the tender material. For information\n on the negotiation process, refer to the tender conditions. The Contracting Entity\n will conduct negotiations as described in the tender specifications. The tendered\n Contract is not divided into lots. The reason for this is that it is not considered\n commercially and economically advantageous due to the scope and nature of the Contract.\n Legal basis: Directive 2014/25/E

Retsgrundlag:

Direktiv 2014/25/EU

2.1.6 Udelukkelsesgrunde

Kilder til grundlag for udelukkelse: Bekendtgørelse

Korruption: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction\n rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly\n in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention\n on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or\n officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in\n Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating\n corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground\n also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority\n (contracting entity) or the economic operator

Svig: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction\n rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly\n in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the\n Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ\n C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).

Hvidvaskning af penge eller finansiering af terrorisme: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or\n terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which\n an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?\n As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of\n the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system\n for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005,\n p. 15).

Deltagelse i en kriminel organisation: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a\n criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which\n an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?\n As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008\n on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).

Terrorhandlinger eller strafbare handlinger med forbindelse til terroraktivitet: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences\n or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five\n years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues\n to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of\n 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground\n also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as\n referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.

Børnearbejde og andre former for menneskehandel: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other\n forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years\n ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to\n be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament\n and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human\n beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA\n (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).

Alvorlige forsømmelser i forbindelse med udøvelsen af erhvervet: Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable,\n see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.

Har afgivet urigtige oplysninger eller tilbageholdt oplysninger, som ikke var i stand til at fremlægge de krævede dokumenter og indhentet fortrolige oplysninger i forbindelse med denne procedure: Can the economic operator confirm that:a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation\n in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds\n for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,b) It has withheld such\n information,c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents\n required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, andd) It has undertaken\n to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting\n entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages\n in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that\n may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?

Interessekonflikt som følge af deltagelse i udbudsproceduren: Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national\n law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in\n the procurement procedure?

Direkte eller indirekte involvering i forberedelsen af denne udbudsprocedure: Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting\n authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the\n procurement procedure?

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser i henhold til rent nationale udelukkelsesgrunde: Section 134a of the Public Procurement Act applies: A contracting authority must exclude\n an applicant or tenderer from participating in a procurement procedure if the applicant\n or tenderer is established in a country that is listed on the EU list of non-cooperative\n tax jurisdictions and has not acceded to the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement\n or other trade agreements that oblige Denmark to open the market for public contracts\n to tenderers established in the respective country.

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af bidrag til sociale sikringsordninger: Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social\n security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member\n State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country\n of establishment?

Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af skatter og afgifter: Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes,\n both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting\n authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?

Erhvervsvirksomheden er indstillet: Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs\n not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory\n under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the\n economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Konkurs: Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion\n of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national\n law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless\n able to perform the contract.

Tvangsakkord uden for konkurs: Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not\n be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under\n the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic\n operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Insolvens: Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information\n needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory\n under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the\n economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Aktiver, der administreres af en kurator: Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the\n court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this\n case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility\n of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

En situation, der svarer til konkurs i henhold til national ret: Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from\n a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not\n be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under\n the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic\n operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

5 Delkontrakt

5.1 Teknisk ID for delkontrakten: LOT-0000

Titel: New Simulators for S-train drivers

Intern ID: A-25354

5.1.1 Formål

Kontraktens hovedformål: Varer

Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser

Primær klassifikation (cpv): 34152000 Øvelsessimulatorer

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 30230000 Computerrelateret udstyr

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 34943000 Togovervågningssystem

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 48931000 Programpakke til uddannelsesformål

Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 80000000 Uddannelse og undervisning

Valgmuligheder:

Beskrivelse af optioner: The Supplier shall provide following Options, and DSB shall be entitled to order Options\n at a Notice specified in Appendix 3 or in accordance with an agreed Time Schedule\n with DSB:

- Addition of the system FOCON to the Simulated Environment
\n
- Additional Simulated Train Route (out and return journey) implemented in the\n Solution

- One (1) or three (3) additional complete Student Desktop Simulators

5.1.2 Udførelsessted

Postadresse: Telegade 2

By: Taastrup

Postnummer: 2630

Landsdel (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Land: Danmark

Yderligere oplysninger:

5.1.3 Anslået varighed

Varighed: 13 År

5.1.4 Fornyelse

Højeste antal fornyelser: 2

Yderligere oplysninger om fornyelser: DSB may notify the Supplier in writing at least 6 months prior to the expiry of the\n Contract, cf. above, of DSB’s desire to extend the Contract for up to 2 additional\n period of 12months, up to a total of 24 months. The extension(s) shall be on the same\n terms and conditions, including prices, in effect at the initial expiry of the Contract.

5.1.5 Værdi

Anslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 3.400.000 Euro

5.1.6 Generelle oplysninger

Reserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.

Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler

Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja

Oplysninger om tidligere bekendtgørelser:

ID for den foregående bekendtgørelse: 143385-2025

5.1.9 Udvælgelseskriterier

Kilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse

Kriterium: Generel årlig omsætning

Beskrivelse: Its general yearly turnover for the number of financial years required in the relevant\n notice, the procurement documents or the ESPD is as follows:

Applicant's\n total yearly turnover in the three most recent available financial years.

As\n a minimum requirement, a total yearly turnover of at least DKK 20 million each year\n in the three most recent available annual reports/financial statements is required.\n

If the applicant relies on the capacity of other entities or in the case\n of a group of economic operators (eg. such as a consortium), the yearly turnover is\n calculated as the applicant's and these other entities' total yearly turnover in each\n of the three most recent available annual reports/financial statements.

In\n the case of a consortium, the yearly turnover is calculated as the companies' total\n yearly turnover in each of the three most recent available annual reports/financial\n statements.

The information is provided in ESPD section IV.B

Kriterium: Finansielt forhold

Beskrivelse: Concerning the financial ratios specified in the relevant notice, the procurement\n documents or the ESPD, the economic operator declares that the actual values for the\n required ratios are as follows:

Applicant's solvency ratio in the three\n most recent available financial years.

As a minimum requirement, the applicant\n must demonstrate an average solvency ratio of at least 20,0% over the three (3) most\n recent available annual reports or financial statements. The solvency ratio shall\n be stated with one (1) decimal.

The solvency ratio for a given financial\n year is calculated as the applicant’s total equity divided by the applicant’s total\n assets, expressed as a percentage. The Solvency ratio is thus calculated as follows:\n (Total Equity/Total Assets) x 100 = solvency ratio.

If the applicant relies\n on the capacities of other entities, the solvency ratio for a given financial year\n is calculated as the combined total equity of the applicant and these other entities\n divided by their combined total assets, expressed as a percentage. Hereafter the average\n solvency ratio is calculated over the three (3) most recent available annual reports\n or financial statements.

In the case of a group of economic operators (e.g.,\n such as a consortium), the solvency ratio for a given financial year is calculated\n as the combined total equity of all participating companies divided by their combined\n total assets, expressed as a percentage. Hereafter the average solvency ratio is calculated\n over the three (3) most recent available annual reports or financial statements.
\n
The information is provided in ESPD section IV.B. The applicant is requested\n to clearly state \"solvency ratio\" in the response.

If the applicant relies\n on the economic and financial capacity of other entities, the contracting authority\n requires that the applicant and the respective entities be jointly and severally liable\n for the execution of the contract. The ESPD serves as preliminary proof that the applicant\n meets the minimum suitability requirements in relation to economic and financial capacity.

Kriterium: Finansielt forhold

Beskrivelse: Concerning the financial ratios specified in the relevant notice, the procurement\n documents or the ESPD, the economic operator declares that the actual values for the\n required ratios are as follows:

Applicant's EBIT margin in the three most\n recent available financial years.

As a minimum requirement, the applicant\n must demonstrate an average EBIT margin of at least 2,0% over the three (3) most recent\n available annual reports or financial statements. The EBIT margin shall be stated\n with one (1) decimal.

The EBIT margin for a given financial year is calculated\n as the applicant’s EBIT divided by the applicant’s Revenue, expressed as a percentage.\n The EBIT margin is thus calculated as follows: (EBIT/Revenue) * 100 = EBIT margin.\n

If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities, the EBIT margin\n for a given financial year is calculated as the combined EBIT of the applicant and\n these other entities divided by their combined Revenue, expressed as a percentage.\n Hereafter the average EBIT margin is calculated over the three (3) most recent available\n annual reports or financial statements.

In the case of a group of economic\n operators (e.g., such as a consortium), the EBIT ratio for a given financial year\n is calculated as the combined combined EBIT of all participating companies divided\n by their combined Revenue, expressed as a percentage. Hereafter the EBIT margin is\n calculated over the three (3) most recent available annual reports or financial statements.
\n
The information is provided in ESPD section IV.B. The applicant is requested\n to clearly state \"EBIT margin\" in the response.

If the applicant relies\n on the economic and financial capacity of other entities, the contracting authority\n requires that the applicant and the respective entities be jointly and severally liable\n for the execution of the contract. The ESPD serves as preliminary proof that the applicant\n meets the minimum suitability requirements in relation to economic and financial capacity.

Kriterium: Referencer på specificerede leverancer

Beskrivelse: // Minimum requirements for the required level:

As a minimum requirement\n the applicant must submit at least one (1) reference documenting experience with the\n delivery of train simulators relating to CBTC train control systems or similar.
\n
// Selection criteria:

If DSB receives 3 or fewer applications that\n meet the above minimum requirements for financial, technical and professional capacity,\n all 3 applicants will be prequalified without selection. If DSB receives 3 applications\n or more, selection will be made based on the applicant's references as described below.
\n
For selection purposes, the applicant can provide up to 3 most significant comparable\n references that the applicant has performed in the last 5 years, due to the long-lasting\n characteristics of the services. The applicant shall be able to give a contact person\n for the reference upon request.

In the selection process, DSB will, based\n on an overall assessment of all three references, emphasize the best demonstration\n of:

- Broad and extensive experience in delivering highly customized desktop\n simulator solutions (including software and hardware) with specifications most similar\n to the services described in the tender, see Appendix 3. By “broad” experience is\n understood; a solution with high degree of customization and/or with a scope in contract\n value/amount simulators covered by the Solution similar to that requested by DSB.\n By extensive is understood; solutions that are used directly for certification-related\n education purposes.

- Experience in delivering desktop simulator solution\n including support and maintenance of the delivered software and hardware, with requirements\n for high functional availability (corresponding to 99% and calculated as stated in\n appendix 8) and solution stability (corresponding to low number of high severity incidents\n measured as stated in appendix 8) and with a long lifespan (corresponding to 15 years,\n as requested by DSB), for a customer with similar characteristics in terms of complexity\n and responsibility as DSB.

- Experience with deliveries highly customized\n to customer's specifications, with a high degree of direct customer-involvement and\n cooperation and with English as the working language

- Experience in developing\n simulators for infrastructure based on Siemens Trainguard MT CBTC or similar
\n
Only references related to deliveries that has been accepted for operation or\n has been completed at the time of application, will be considered in the assessment\n of which applicants have documented the most relevant deliveries, see above regarding\n selection criteria/limitation of candidates. If it is an ongoing task, only the part\n of the deliveries that have already been completed at the time of application will\n be included in the assessment of the reference.

Each reference should contain\n a brief description of the delivery. The description of the delivery should include\n a clear description of the delivery and how it relates to the listed selection criterion,\n as well as the applicant's role(s) in the execution of the delivery. Furthermore,\n the reference should include the economic value of the delivery (amount), date of\n the delivery, and name of the customer (recipient). When indicating the date of the\n delivery, the applicant should specify the start and end date of the delivery. If\n this is not possible, e.g., because the tasks are performed continuously, the applicant\n should indicate in the description of the delivery, how the date is specified.
\n
A maximum of 3 references can be provided, regardless of whether the applicant\n is a single company, relies on the technical capacity of other entities, or is a consortium.\n If the applicant relies on the professional qualifications or professional experience\n of other entities regarding the execution of specific parts of the deliveries covered\n by the contract, see the description under \"Subject\" and \"Description of the tender,\"\n the specific parts of the services under the contract must be performed by the entity\n on which the applicant relies.

The ESPD serves as preliminary evidence of\n how the applicant meets the selection criterion. Before the award decision, the tenderer\n to whom the contracting authority intends to award the contract must provide documentation\n that the information in the ESPD is correct. The applicant will not be required to\n provide additional documentation for technical and professional capacity. However,\n the contracting authority reserves the right to contact the applicant, or the customer\n specified in the reference to verify the information about the reference, including\n the times specified for the reference.

Kriteriet vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren

Højeste antal udvalgte tilbud: 3

Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:

Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 3

Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 3

Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive

5.1.10 Tildelingskriterier

Kriterium:

Type: Omkostninger

Navn: Cost

Beskrivelse: Evaluation of the sub criterion “Cost” is based on the total evaluation-technical\n price cf. Appendix 10.a – Price Specifications. The calculation is based on Appendix\n 10.a – Price Specifications in accordance with the charges offered by the tenderer.

Kategori for tildelingskriteriet tærskel: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)

Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 20

Kriterium:

Type: Kvalitet

Navn: Quality of the Solution

Beskrivelse: Evaluation of the sub criterion “Quality of the Solution” is based on the Tenderer’s\n reply to the following evaluable requirements (appendix 3); ID-4 (\"Functionality,\n process and flow of the Roles\" - weighted 35%); ID-42 (\"Simulated Environment - Scope\n & Durability\" - weighted 35%); and ID-108 (\"Building and play-out of Simulated Training\n Exercises and Scenarios\" - weighted 30%).

DSB will conduct an overall evaluation\n of the Sub sub-criterions based on the Tenderers fulfillment of the requirements in\n Appendix 3.

Kategori for tildelingskriteriet tærskel: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)

Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 40

Kriterium:

Type: Kvalitet

Navn: Supply Efficiency

Beskrivelse: Evaluation of the sub sub-criterion \"Supply Efficiency\" is based on the stated date\n of the Milestone: “(Partial) Delivery #1 Site Acceptance Test approved” as stated\n by the Tenderer in appendix 1.b (Supplier’s Time and Activity Plan).

DSB\n will conduct an overall evaluation based on the date of the Milestone and the descriptive\n scale in Appendix A.

Kategori for tildelingskriteriet tærskel: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)

Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 20

Kriterium:

Type: Kvalitet

Navn: Delivery

Beskrivelse: Evaluation of the sub criterion “Quality of the Solution” is based on the Tenderer’s\n reply to the following evaluable requirements in appendix 1, ID-1 (\"Supplier’s Time\n and Activity Plan\" - weighted 50%) and in appendix 14, ID-1 (\"Requirements regarding\n Supplier’s Project Organization\" - weighted 50%).

DSB will conduct an overall\n evaluation of the Sub sub-criterions based on the Tenderers fulfillment of the requirements\n in Appendix 1 and 14.

Kategori for tildelingskriteriet tærskel: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)

Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 20

5.1.11 Udbudsdokumenter

Sprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk

Frist for anmodning om yderligere oplysninger: 10-10-2025 10:00 +00:00

Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=439546&B=

5.1.12 Udbudsvilkår

Vilkår for indgivelse:

Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet

Indgivelsesadresse: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=439546&B=

Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk

Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt

Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt

Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt

Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 17-10-2025 10:00 +00:00

Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:

Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej

Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The contract incorporates considerations of social responsibility as formulated in\n the conventions underlying the principles of the UN
Global Compact and as formulated\n in the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, to the relevant extent. Additionally,\n contractual requirements are set in accordance with ILO Convention 94 on labor clauses\n in public contracts and Circular no. 9471 of June 30, 2014.

Transfer of\n personal data, as defined under the EU Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection\n Regulation), to third countries or international organizations by the Data Processor\n or Sub-Data Processor is not allowed under the Contract.

Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet

Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: ja

Oplysninger om finansiering og betaling: The financing and payment terms will be stated in the tender material. Reference is\n also made to the required electronic invoicing and the possibility of electronic ordering\n in accordance with Executive Order no. 798 of June 28, 2007 on public payments, etc.\n with subsequent amendments. The Executive Order can be accessed at www.retsinformation.dk

5.1.15 Teknikker

Rammeaftale:

Ingen rammeaftale

Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:

Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem

5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgang

Organisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for Udbud

Oplysninger om klagefrister: In accordance with the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement etc. (the\n act can be accessed at www.retsinformation.dk), the following deadlines apply for\n filing a complaint:A complaint about not being selected must be submitted to the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days, cf. section 7, subsection 1\n of the act, from the day after the notification is sent to the affected applicants\n about who has been selected, when the notification is accompanied by a justification\n for the decision in accordance with section 2, subsection 1, no. 1 of the act.In other\n situations, a complaint about procurement, cf. section 7, subsection 2 of the act,\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:45 calendar\n days from the day after the contracting authority publishes a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union about conclusion of the contract. No later than at the\n same time as a complaint is submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement,\n the complainant must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint\n is being submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the\n complaint is submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6, subsection 4 of\n the act. In cases where the complaint is not submitted during the standstill period,\n the complainant must also indicate whether a suspensive effect of the complaint is\n requested, cf. section 12, subsection 1 of the act. The email address of the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement is provided under \"Organization\". The complaint guidance\n of the Complaints Board for Public Procurement can be found at
https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/vejledning/

Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: DSB

Organisation, der sikrer adgang til udbudsdokumenterne offline: DSB

Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

Organisation, der modtager ansøgninger om deltagelse: DSB

Organisation, der behandler tilbud: DSB

2 Procedure

2.1 Procedure

Title: New Simulators for S-train drivers

Description: The scope of the Contract is to provide a new, full-stack Solution regarding Desktop\n simulators for S-train drivers for DSB to implement in the S-train driver Education\n Program. The Solution is expected to operate until the new S-trains (driverless) have\n been implemented, including a period of mixed traffic. However, the scope of this\n Contract is only the education of drivers for the current S-train type.

The\n new Desktop Simulator Solution is to be used to train new S-train drivers in basic\n Education, as well as yearly follow-up training for all S-train drivers. The Simulated\n Environment of the Solution shall prioritize functional fidelity and be able to simulate\n part of the infrastructure (as Simulated Train Front View), parts of the train (as\n Simulated Control and Instrument Panel) and parts of the training material (as Simulated\n Training and Exercise Scenarios) with the functional and physical fidelity defined\n in appendix 3, Requirement specification. The Solution shall also support DSB’s creation\n of own Simulated Training Exercises and Scenarios.

The Solution should\n cover the development of a full-stack Solution of Software and Hardware in collaboration\n with the Customer, possibilities for Further Development, as well as the Support and\n Maintenance of the Solution and related Services for the duration of the Contract\n period.

DSB aims at implementing the new Solution in the DSB Education\n Program for courses starting by April 2027. To achieve this, DSB aims for (Partial)\n Delivery of the required Solution early 2027 which at least covers certain prioritized\n requirements (see Appendix A, C, 1 and 3), depending on the tenderer’s capacity. The\n plan and scope of the tender is informed by previous market dialogue (see prior information\n notice). DSB is open to different delivery models, simulation methods and timelines\n as reflected in the tender material (cf. appendix 1 and 3) and tender procedure.

Procedure identifier: e5ae55c3-4b51-47c3-bfbb-1c49bab10a7a

Internal identifier: A-25354

Type of procedure: Negotiated with prior publication of a call for competition / competitive with negotiation

The procedure is accelerated: no

Main features of the procedure: 3 applicants are prequalified to submit tendersA negotiated tender is carried out,\n cf. the tender specifications. The contracting authority will not pay any participation\n fees to the tenderers.

After receiving initial tenders, the contracting\n authority shall hold individual negotiation meetings with all tenderers who have submitted\n an initial tender in due time. The negotiations shall be conducted in accordance with\n the principle of equal treatment, and all tenderers shall be given the same time for\n negotiations with the contracting authority.

In relation to the negotiations,\n DSB does not consider the following aspects to be fundamental elements pursuant to\n the Public Procurement Act (reference), which implies that DSB reserves the right\n to discuss these aspects during negotiations and, if necessary, amend the material\n on that basis:
- Scope and number of priority requirements (market ‘P1’, cf. Appendix\n 3)
- Stated allocation of DSB's estimated resources (cf. Appendix 14)
- Subdivision\n of Support & Maintenance into Hardware and Software (cf. Appendices 7 and 10.a)
-\n Scope and warranties in regard to Support and Maintenance (see Appendices 7 and 10a)
-\n Choice of price regulation index (see Appendix 10)

The negotiation process\n is described in more detail in the tender conditions.

2.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract: Supplies

Additional nature of the contract: Services

Main classification (cpv): 34152000 Training simulators

Additional classification (cpv): 30230000 Computer-related equipment

Additional classification (cpv): 34943000 Train-monitoring system

Additional classification (cpv): 48931000 Training software package

Additional classification (cpv): 80000000 Education and training services

2.1.2 Place of performance

Postal address: Telegade 2

Town: Taastrup

Postcode: 2630

Country subdivision (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Country: Denmark

2.1.3 Value

Estimated value excluding VAT: 3.400.000 Euro

2.1.4 General information

Additional information: Participation in the tender can only take place electronically via the Contracting\n Entity's electronic tendering system. To access the tender material, the applicant\n must be registered or register as a user. If the application contains multiple versions\n of the same document, the latest uploaded version will be the valid one. All communication\n related to the tender procedure, including questions and answers, must take place\n via the electronic tendering system.

The Contracting Entity prefers that\n questions regarding prequalification be submitted no later than 06.10.2025, at 12.00.\n Questions submitted after this date will be answered if they are received in time\n for the Contracting Entity to obtain the necessary information and provide answers\n no later than six days before the application deadline. Questions received later than\n six days before the deadline cannot be expected to be answered. Interested parties\n are advised to stay informed via the electronic tendering system.

If the\n applicant experiences problems with the system, support can be contacted via email\n at dksupport@eu-supply.com or by phone (+45-7020 8014).

The applicant must\n submit an ESPD as its application as preliminary proof of the conditions mentioned\n in Section 148, paragraph 1, numbers 1-3 of the Public Procurement Act, cf. the regulation\n on procedures for entering into contracts within water and energy supply, transport,\n and postal services Section 11. It is not necessary for the applicant to sign its\n ESPD document.

If the applicant is a consortium then the applicant must\n submit a consortium declaration. In the case of a consortium, a separate ESPD must\n be submitted for each participating economic operator. If the applicant is a consortium,\n each participant's ESPD document must be signed by the respective participant. It\n is not necessary for the leading applicant submitting the application to sign its\n ESPD document. If the applicant relies on the capacity of other entities, an ESPD\n must be submitted for each entity on which it relies, and the ESPD document must be\n signed by the supporting entity. The applicant must also submit a support declaration\n in which the entity or entities on which the applicant relies declare to be jointly\n and severally liable with the applicant if awarded the contract. The template is attached\n as an appendix to the tender conditions. Before the award decision, the tenderer to\n whom the Contracting Entity intends to award the contract must provide documentation\n for the information given in the ESPD in accordance with Sections 151 and 152, paragraph\n 3 of the Public Procurement Act, cf. the implementation regulation Section 11. This\n documentation will consist of a Service Certificate \"Serviceattest\" (issued no earlier\n than six months before the tender deadline) and annual accounts/auditor's statement\n for Danish tenderers, cf. the tender conditions. Equivalent documentation will be\n provided for foreign tenderers. If the application is submitted by a consortium, a\n correctly completed consortium declaration must also be submitted for the consortium\n as a whole. If the applicant relies on the economic and financial or technical and\n professional capacity of supporting entities, the applicant must also submit a correctly\n completed support declaration in which the supporting entity/entities legally commit\n to making their resources available. In the event of changes to the composition of\n the tenderer, the rules in Section 147 of the Public Procurement Act apply in full.
\n
The Contracting Entity's estimate of the Contracts' value is based on the Contracting\n Entity's expectation of the offered prices for initial development and implementation,\n yearly support and maintenance of software and hardware, options as well as estimated\n number of services-as-per-hour for the entire Contract period, including price adjustments.
\n
The estimated contract value represents DSB's budget. If the winning tender is\n significantly above the expected budget in relation to development, support and maintenance\n of the solution, corresponding to an estimated EUR 1,75 million (approx. DKK 13 million),\n there is a risk that DSB may decide to cancel the tender.

The Contracting\n Entity may request applicants to supplement, clarify, or complete the application\n in accordance with Article 76, number 4 of the Utilities Directive if applications\n or tenders do not meet the formal requirements of the tender material. For information\n on the negotiation process, refer to the tender conditions. The Contracting Entity\n will conduct negotiations as described in the tender specifications. The tendered\n Contract is not divided into lots. The reason for this is that it is not considered\n commercially and economically advantageous due to the scope and nature of the Contract.\n Legal basis: Directive 2014/25/E

Legal basis:

Directive 2014/25/EU

2.1.6 Grounds for exclusion

Sources of grounds for exclusion: Notice

Corruption: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction\n rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly\n in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention\n on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or\n officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in\n Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating\n corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground\n also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority\n (contracting entity) or the economic operator

Fraud: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction\n rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly\n in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the\n Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ\n C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).

Money laundering or terrorist financing: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or\n terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which\n an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?\n As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of\n the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system\n for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005,\n p. 15).

Participation in a criminal organisation: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a\n criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which\n an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?\n As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008\n on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).

Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences\n or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five\n years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues\n to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of\n 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground\n also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as\n referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.

Child labour and including other forms of trafficking in human beings: Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative,\n management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control\n therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other\n forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years\n ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to\n be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament\n and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human\n beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA\n (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).

Grave professional misconduct: Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable,\n see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.

Misrepresentation, withheld information, unable to provide required documents and obtained confidential information of this procedure: Can the economic operator confirm that:a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation\n in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds\n for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,b) It has withheld such\n information,c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents\n required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, andd) It has undertaken\n to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting\n entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages\n in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that\n may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?

Conflict of interest due to its participation in the procurement procedure: Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national\n law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in\n the procurement procedure?

Direct or indirect involvement in the preparation of this procurement procedure: Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting\n authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the\n procurement procedure?

Breaching of obligations set under purely national exclusion grounds: Section 134a of the Public Procurement Act applies: A contracting authority must exclude\n an applicant or tenderer from participating in a procurement procedure if the applicant\n or tenderer is established in a country that is listed on the EU list of non-cooperative\n tax jurisdictions and has not acceded to the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement\n or other trade agreements that oblige Denmark to open the market for public contracts\n to tenderers established in the respective country.

Breaching obligation relating to payment of social security contributions: Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social\n security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member\n State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country\n of establishment?

Breaching obligation relating to payment of taxes: Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes,\n both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting\n authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?

Business activities are suspended: Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs\n not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory\n under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the\n economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Bankruptcy: Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion\n of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national\n law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless\n able to perform the contract.

Arrangement with creditors: Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not\n be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under\n the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic\n operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Insolvency: Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information\n needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory\n under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the\n economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Assets being administered by liquidator: Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the\n court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this\n case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility\n of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Analogous situation like bankruptcy, insolvency or arrangement with creditors under national law: Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from\n a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not\n be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under\n the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic\n operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

5 Lot

5.1 Lot technical ID: LOT-0000

Title: New Simulators for S-train drivers

Internal identifier: A-25354

5.1.1 Purpose

Main nature of the contract: Supplies

Additional nature of the contract: Services

Main classification (cpv): 34152000 Training simulators

Additional classification (cpv): 30230000 Computer-related equipment

Additional classification (cpv): 34943000 Train-monitoring system

Additional classification (cpv): 48931000 Training software package

Additional classification (cpv): 80000000 Education and training services

Options:

Description of the options: The Supplier shall provide following Options, and DSB shall be entitled to order Options\n at a Notice specified in Appendix 3 or in accordance with an agreed Time Schedule\n with DSB:

- Addition of the system FOCON to the Simulated Environment
\n
- Additional Simulated Train Route (out and return journey) implemented in the\n Solution

- One (1) or three (3) additional complete Student Desktop Simulators

5.1.2 Place of performance

Postal address: Telegade 2

Town: Taastrup

Postcode: 2630

Country subdivision (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)

Country: Denmark

Additional information:

5.1.3 Estimated duration

Duration: 13 Year

5.1.4 Renewal

Maximum renewals: 2

Other information about renewals: DSB may notify the Supplier in writing at least 6 months prior to the expiry of the\n Contract, cf. above, of DSB’s desire to extend the Contract for up to 2 additional\n period of 12months, up to a total of 24 months. The extension(s) shall be on the same\n terms and conditions, including prices, in effect at the initial expiry of the Contract.

5.1.5 Value

Estimated value excluding VAT: 3.400.000 Euro

5.1.6 General information

Reserved participation: Participation is not reserved.

Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.

The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes

Information about previous notices:

Identifier of the previous notice: 143385-2025

5.1.9 Selection criteria

Sources of selection criteria: Notice

Criterion: General yearly turnover

Description: Its general yearly turnover for the number of financial years required in the relevant\n notice, the procurement documents or the ESPD is as follows:

Applicant's\n total yearly turnover in the three most recent available financial years.

As\n a minimum requirement, a total yearly turnover of at least DKK 20 million each year\n in the three most recent available annual reports/financial statements is required.\n

If the applicant relies on the capacity of other entities or in the case\n of a group of economic operators (eg. such as a consortium), the yearly turnover is\n calculated as the applicant's and these other entities' total yearly turnover in each\n of the three most recent available annual reports/financial statements.

In\n the case of a consortium, the yearly turnover is calculated as the companies' total\n yearly turnover in each of the three most recent available annual reports/financial\n statements.

The information is provided in ESPD section IV.B

Criterion: Financial ratio

Description: Concerning the financial ratios specified in the relevant notice, the procurement\n documents or the ESPD, the economic operator declares that the actual values for the\n required ratios are as follows:

Applicant's solvency ratio in the three\n most recent available financial years.

As a minimum requirement, the applicant\n must demonstrate an average solvency ratio of at least 20,0% over the three (3) most\n recent available annual reports or financial statements. The solvency ratio shall\n be stated with one (1) decimal.

The solvency ratio for a given financial\n year is calculated as the applicant’s total equity divided by the applicant’s total\n assets, expressed as a percentage. The Solvency ratio is thus calculated as follows:\n (Total Equity/Total Assets) x 100 = solvency ratio.

If the applicant relies\n on the capacities of other entities, the solvency ratio for a given financial year\n is calculated as the combined total equity of the applicant and these other entities\n divided by their combined total assets, expressed as a percentage. Hereafter the average\n solvency ratio is calculated over the three (3) most recent available annual reports\n or financial statements.

In the case of a group of economic operators (e.g.,\n such as a consortium), the solvency ratio for a given financial year is calculated\n as the combined total equity of all participating companies divided by their combined\n total assets, expressed as a percentage. Hereafter the average solvency ratio is calculated\n over the three (3) most recent available annual reports or financial statements.
\n
The information is provided in ESPD section IV.B. The applicant is requested\n to clearly state \"solvency ratio\" in the response.

If the applicant relies\n on the economic and financial capacity of other entities, the contracting authority\n requires that the applicant and the respective entities be jointly and severally liable\n for the execution of the contract. The ESPD serves as preliminary proof that the applicant\n meets the minimum suitability requirements in relation to economic and financial capacity.

Criterion: Financial ratio

Description: Concerning the financial ratios specified in the relevant notice, the procurement\n documents or the ESPD, the economic operator declares that the actual values for the\n required ratios are as follows:

Applicant's EBIT margin in the three most\n recent available financial years.

As a minimum requirement, the applicant\n must demonstrate an average EBIT margin of at least 2,0% over the three (3) most recent\n available annual reports or financial statements. The EBIT margin shall be stated\n with one (1) decimal.

The EBIT margin for a given financial year is calculated\n as the applicant’s EBIT divided by the applicant’s Revenue, expressed as a percentage.\n The EBIT margin is thus calculated as follows: (EBIT/Revenue) * 100 = EBIT margin.\n

If the applicant relies on the capacities of other entities, the EBIT margin\n for a given financial year is calculated as the combined EBIT of the applicant and\n these other entities divided by their combined Revenue, expressed as a percentage.\n Hereafter the average EBIT margin is calculated over the three (3) most recent available\n annual reports or financial statements.

In the case of a group of economic\n operators (e.g., such as a consortium), the EBIT ratio for a given financial year\n is calculated as the combined combined EBIT of all participating companies divided\n by their combined Revenue, expressed as a percentage. Hereafter the EBIT margin is\n calculated over the three (3) most recent available annual reports or financial statements.
\n
The information is provided in ESPD section IV.B. The applicant is requested\n to clearly state \"EBIT margin\" in the response.

If the applicant relies\n on the economic and financial capacity of other entities, the contracting authority\n requires that the applicant and the respective entities be jointly and severally liable\n for the execution of the contract. The ESPD serves as preliminary proof that the applicant\n meets the minimum suitability requirements in relation to economic and financial capacity.

Criterion: References on specified deliveries

Description: // Minimum requirements for the required level:

As a minimum requirement\n the applicant must submit at least one (1) reference documenting experience with the\n delivery of train simulators relating to CBTC train control systems or similar.
\n
// Selection criteria:

If DSB receives 3 or fewer applications that\n meet the above minimum requirements for financial, technical and professional capacity,\n all 3 applicants will be prequalified without selection. If DSB receives 3 applications\n or more, selection will be made based on the applicant's references as described below.
\n
For selection purposes, the applicant can provide up to 3 most significant comparable\n references that the applicant has performed in the last 5 years, due to the long-lasting\n characteristics of the services. The applicant shall be able to give a contact person\n for the reference upon request.

In the selection process, DSB will, based\n on an overall assessment of all three references, emphasize the best demonstration\n of:

- Broad and extensive experience in delivering highly customized desktop\n simulator solutions (including software and hardware) with specifications most similar\n to the services described in the tender, see Appendix 3. By “broad” experience is\n understood; a solution with high degree of customization and/or with a scope in contract\n value/amount simulators covered by the Solution similar to that requested by DSB.\n By extensive is understood; solutions that are used directly for certification-related\n education purposes.

- Experience in delivering desktop simulator solution\n including support and maintenance of the delivered software and hardware, with requirements\n for high functional availability (corresponding to 99% and calculated as stated in\n appendix 8) and solution stability (corresponding to low number of high severity incidents\n measured as stated in appendix 8) and with a long lifespan (corresponding to 15 years,\n as requested by DSB), for a customer with similar characteristics in terms of complexity\n and responsibility as DSB.

- Experience with deliveries highly customized\n to customer's specifications, with a high degree of direct customer-involvement and\n cooperation and with English as the working language

- Experience in developing\n simulators for infrastructure based on Siemens Trainguard MT CBTC or similar
\n
Only references related to deliveries that has been accepted for operation or\n has been completed at the time of application, will be considered in the assessment\n of which applicants have documented the most relevant deliveries, see above regarding\n selection criteria/limitation of candidates. If it is an ongoing task, only the part\n of the deliveries that have already been completed at the time of application will\n be included in the assessment of the reference.

Each reference should contain\n a brief description of the delivery. The description of the delivery should include\n a clear description of the delivery and how it relates to the listed selection criterion,\n as well as the applicant's role(s) in the execution of the delivery. Furthermore,\n the reference should include the economic value of the delivery (amount), date of\n the delivery, and name of the customer (recipient). When indicating the date of the\n delivery, the applicant should specify the start and end date of the delivery. If\n this is not possible, e.g., because the tasks are performed continuously, the applicant\n should indicate in the description of the delivery, how the date is specified.
\n
A maximum of 3 references can be provided, regardless of whether the applicant\n is a single company, relies on the technical capacity of other entities, or is a consortium.\n If the applicant relies on the professional qualifications or professional experience\n of other entities regarding the execution of specific parts of the deliveries covered\n by the contract, see the description under \"Subject\" and \"Description of the tender,\"\n the specific parts of the services under the contract must be performed by the entity\n on which the applicant relies.

The ESPD serves as preliminary evidence of\n how the applicant meets the selection criterion. Before the award decision, the tenderer\n to whom the contracting authority intends to award the contract must provide documentation\n that the information in the ESPD is correct. The applicant will not be required to\n provide additional documentation for technical and professional capacity. However,\n the contracting authority reserves the right to contact the applicant, or the customer\n specified in the reference to verify the information about the reference, including\n the times specified for the reference.

The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure

Maximum number of tenders passing: 3

Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:

Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 3

Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 3

The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated

5.1.10 Award criteria

Criterion:

Type: Cost

Name: Cost

Description: Evaluation of the sub criterion “Cost” is based on the total evaluation-technical\n price cf. Appendix 10.a – Price Specifications. The calculation is based on Appendix\n 10.a – Price Specifications in accordance with the charges offered by the tenderer.

Category of award threshold criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)

Award criterion number: 20

Criterion:

Type: Quality

Name: Quality of the Solution

Description: Evaluation of the sub criterion “Quality of the Solution” is based on the Tenderer’s\n reply to the following evaluable requirements (appendix 3); ID-4 (\"Functionality,\n process and flow of the Roles\" - weighted 35%); ID-42 (\"Simulated Environment - Scope\n & Durability\" - weighted 35%); and ID-108 (\"Building and play-out of Simulated Training\n Exercises and Scenarios\" - weighted 30%).

DSB will conduct an overall evaluation\n of the Sub sub-criterions based on the Tenderers fulfillment of the requirements in\n Appendix 3.

Category of award threshold criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)

Award criterion number: 40

Criterion:

Type: Quality

Name: Supply Efficiency

Description: Evaluation of the sub sub-criterion \"Supply Efficiency\" is based on the stated date\n of the Milestone: “(Partial) Delivery #1 Site Acceptance Test approved” as stated\n by the Tenderer in appendix 1.b (Supplier’s Time and Activity Plan).

DSB\n will conduct an overall evaluation based on the date of the Milestone and the descriptive\n scale in Appendix A.

Category of award threshold criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)

Award criterion number: 20

Criterion:

Type: Quality

Name: Delivery

Description: Evaluation of the sub criterion “Quality of the Solution” is based on the Tenderer’s\n reply to the following evaluable requirements in appendix 1, ID-1 (\"Supplier’s Time\n and Activity Plan\" - weighted 50%) and in appendix 14, ID-1 (\"Requirements regarding\n Supplier’s Project Organization\" - weighted 50%).

DSB will conduct an overall\n evaluation of the Sub sub-criterions based on the Tenderers fulfillment of the requirements\n in Appendix 1 and 14.

Category of award threshold criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)

Award criterion number: 20

5.1.11 Procurement documents

Languages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English

Deadline for requesting additional information: 10-10-2025 10:00 +00:00

Address of the procurement documents: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=439546&B=

5.1.12 Terms of procurement

Terms of submission:

Electronic submission: Required

Address for submission: https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=439546&B=

Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English

Electronic catalogue: Not allowed

Variants: Not allowed

Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed

Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 17-10-2025 10:00 +00:00

Terms of contract:

The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No

Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The contract incorporates considerations of social responsibility as formulated in\n the conventions underlying the principles of the UN
Global Compact and as formulated\n in the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, to the relevant extent. Additionally,\n contractual requirements are set in accordance with ILO Convention 94 on labor clauses\n in public contracts and Circular no. 9471 of June 30, 2014.

Transfer of\n personal data, as defined under the EU Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection\n Regulation), to third countries or international organizations by the Data Processor\n or Sub-Data Processor is not allowed under the Contract.

Electronic invoicing: Required

Electronic ordering will be used: yes

Financial arrangement: The financing and payment terms will be stated in the tender material. Reference is\n also made to the required electronic invoicing and the possibility of electronic ordering\n in accordance with Executive Order no. 798 of June 28, 2007 on public payments, etc.\n with subsequent amendments. The Executive Order can be accessed at www.retsinformation.dk

5.1.15 Techniques

Framework agreement:

No framework agreement

Information about the dynamic purchasing system:

No dynamic purchase system

5.1.16 Further information, mediation and review

Review organisation: Klagenævnet for Udbud

Information about review deadlines: In accordance with the Act on the Complaints Board for Public Procurement etc. (the\n act can be accessed at www.retsinformation.dk), the following deadlines apply for\n filing a complaint:A complaint about not being selected must be submitted to the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days, cf. section 7, subsection 1\n of the act, from the day after the notification is sent to the affected applicants\n about who has been selected, when the notification is accompanied by a justification\n for the decision in accordance with section 2, subsection 1, no. 1 of the act.In other\n situations, a complaint about procurement, cf. section 7, subsection 2 of the act,\n must be submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:45 calendar\n days from the day after the contracting authority publishes a notice in the Official\n Journal of the European Union about conclusion of the contract. No later than at the\n same time as a complaint is submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement,\n the complainant must notify the contracting authority in writing that a complaint\n is being submitted to the Complaints Board for Public Procurement, and whether the\n complaint is submitted during the standstill period, cf. section 6, subsection 4 of\n the act. In cases where the complaint is not submitted during the standstill period,\n the complainant must also indicate whether a suspensive effect of the complaint is\n requested, cf. section 12, subsection 1 of the act. The email address of the Complaints\n Board for Public Procurement is provided under \"Organization\". The complaint guidance\n of the Complaints Board for Public Procurement can be found at
https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/vejledning/

Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: DSB

Organisation providing offline access to the procurement documents: DSB

Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen

Organisation receiving requests to participate: DSB

Organisation processing tenders: DSB