{"bekendtgoerelseNoegle":{"noticeId":{"value":"053d37d0-1148-45c6-ac0f-663d8b7ca332"},"noticeVersion":{"value":"01"},"noticePublicationNumber":{"value":"00430675-2026"}},"htmlDA":"\n\n \n 1 Køber1.1 KøberOfficielt navn: Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation\n Køberens retlige status: Central regeringsmyndighed\n Køberen er en ordregivende enhed\n Den ordregivende myndigheds aktivitet: Forsvarsområdet\n \n \n 2 Procedure2.1 ProcedureTitel: Framework Agreement regarding Chargers for Tactical Batteries\n Beskrivelse: This tender concerns charging, discharging and analysis of tactical soldier batteries.\n
If the charger does not have built-in adapter for required batteries, then\n a number of adapters are to be expected to cover charging of required batteries.
The\n purpose of this tender is to strengthen the soldier’s ability to charge their batteries\n or swap them for fully charged ones at every phase during their mission.
TRAINING,\n SERVICES AND SPARE PARTS:
Three types of training courses are required: ’Basic’,\n ’Advanced’ and ’Specialist’.
- “Basic” covers the general use of the charger.
-\n “Advanced” covers major repairs and troubleshooting.
- “Specialist” covers all\n the workings of the charger to a level where a Specialist can train both a Basic user\n and an Advanced user.
Supplier shall offer technical consulting and services\n for repair of products.
It is noted that the framework agreement grants\n DALO a right to purchase spare parts to the chargers and/or adapters under certain\n specified conditions (see the framework agreement for details (the framework agreement\n is only available to prequalified applicants)).\n Identifikator for proceduren: 461c0ef2-d95a-406c-b6b3-fe8f8d0a690b\n Intern ID: fb68cc5b-f5aa-41b3-9ecc-8c8315a22b2c\n Udbudsprocedure: Begrænset\n Proceduren er en hasteprocedure: nej\n Hovedpunkterne i proceduren: REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION:
Please note that each candidate may only submit one\n request for participation for each lot.
DEADLINES:
- The deadline for\n applicants to submit questions is 29 July 2026 at 23:59 (local Danish time), cf. section\n \"Additional information deadline\". Due to technical reasons, the deadline is displayed\n as 23:55; however, the correct deadline is 23:59.
- DALO will respond to submitted\n questions no later than 5 August 2026 at 23:59 (local Danish time).
- Application\n deadline, cf. section \"Time limit for receipt of tenders or requests to participate\":\n 12 August 2026 at 10:00 (am) (local Danish time).
PREQUALIFICATION QUESTIONNARE:
DALO\n has prepared a prequalification questionnaire (“PQQ”) which the candidates are encouraged\n to use when submitting their applications. The PQQ contains enclosures and templates\n for providing information etc. in accordance with the requirements in this Contract\n Notice. However, it is emphasised that it is the sole responsibility of the candidate\n that the information provided fulfils the requirements. The PQQ is available in the\n electronic procurement system.
SELF-DECLARATION REGARDING NON-EXCLUSION AND\n DEBT:
When submitting the request for participation/prequalification, the candidate\n must submit a declaration stating that the candidate (1) is not subject to any of\n the mandatory grounds for exclusion stated in Article 39(1) of the Defence and Security\n Directive and (2) to which degree the candidate has unpaid overdue debt in relation\n to taxes or social security contributions under Danish law or under the law of the\n country in which the candidate is established. DALO reserves the right, at any time\n during the tender process, to let the candidate rectify a missing or inadequately\n completed self-declaration.
A template for the declaration is provided in\n the electronic tendering system, which the candidate must use.
If the candidate\n is composed of a group of entities (e.g. a consortium), including temporary joint\n ventures, or relies its technical and/or professional capacity on other entities,\n a declaration must be submitted for each participating entity.
Even if a\n candidate or a tenderer is subject to an exclusion ground, it will not be excluded\n if it has provided sufficient documentation that it is reliable. DALO will decide\n whether the documentation is sufficient. DALO’s assessment will be made according\n to the guidelines in section 138(1)-(4) of the Danish Act no. 1564 of 15 December\n 2015, as amended (the “Public Procurement Act”).
SELF-DECLARATION REGARDING\n LABOUR CLAUSES, CSR OBLIGATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS:
As part of the request\n to participate, the candidate must also submit a self-declaration on compliance with\n labour clauses, CSR obligations and international sanctions. DALO reserves the right,\n at any time during the tender process, to let the candidate rectify a missing or inadequately\n completed self-declaration.
DALO has uploaded a template (available in the\n electronic tender system) which must be used as a declaration.
Where groups\n of entities (e.g. consortiums), including temporary joint ventures, participate jointly\n in the tender procedure, or the candidate relies its technical and/or professional\n capacity on other entities, the declaration must be provided separately for each of\n the participating entities.
LETTER OF COMFORT:
According to the Defence\n and Security Directive, a candidate may rely on the economic and financial standing\n and/or technical and/or professional capacity of other entities, regardless of the\n legal nature of the links with the entities. If a candidate intends to rely on other\n entities and wants the capacity of such other entities to be taken into account when\n DALO assesses the suitability of the candidate, the candidate must prove that the\n other entities will and are obliged to provide the relevant resources at the disposal\n of the candidate. A template for a declaration from the supporting entity to this\n effect is included in the PQQ referred to above.
APPLICATION DOCUMENTS:
A\n request to participate in the prequalification phase consists of the following completed\n documents:
- Prequalification Questionnare (PQQ)
- Enclosure 1 - Declaration\n regarding non-exclusion and debt to public authorities
- Enclosure 2 - Self-declaration\n on compliance with Corporate Social Responsibility and international sanctions
-\n Template 1 - Consortium Declaration (if relevant)
- Template 2 - Letter of comfort\n - Technical and professional capacity (if relevant)
- Template 3 - Information\n regarding technical and professional capacity\n 2.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Varer\n Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 31000000 Elektriske maskiner, apparatur, udstyr og forbrugsartikler; belysning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31111000 Adaptere\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31681500 Opladere\n \n 2.1.2 UdførelsesstedPostadresse: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n 2.1.3 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 199.500.000 Dansk krone\n Rammeaftalens maksimumværdi: 300.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 2.1.4 Generelle oplysninger\n \n The Defence and Security Directive (Directive 2009/81/EC) - The Defence and Security Directive (Directive 2009/81/EC) is implemented in Danish\n law by Ministerial Order for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts\n and service contracts in the fields of defence and security (Ministerial Order No.\n 1077 of 29 June 2022), which also contains supplementary provisions.\n \n 2.1.5 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Det højeste antal delkontrakter, for hvilket en tilbudsgiver kan indgive tilbud: 6\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Det højeste antal delkontrakter, for hvilket der kan tildeles kontrakter til én tilbudsgiver: 6\n \n \n 2.1.6 UdelukkelsesgrundeKilder til grundlag for udelukkelse: Bekendtgørelse\n Korruption: See Article 39(1)(b) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Svig: See Article 39(1)(c) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Hvidvaskning af penge eller finansiering af terrorisme: See Article 39(1)(e) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Deltagelse i en kriminel organisation: See Article 39(1)(a) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Terrorhandlinger eller strafbare handlinger med forbindelse til terroraktivitet: See Article 39(1)(d) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af bidrag til sociale sikringsordninger: DALO will exclude a tenderer which has unpaid overdue debt of DKK 100,000 or more\n to public authorities in relation to social security contributions under Danish law\n or under the law of the country in which the tenderer is established, unless the tenderer\n has provided or will provide collateral for the overdue debt or has entered into an\n instalment agreement which has not been breached.\n Tilsidesættelse af forpligtelser vedrørende betaling af skatter og afgifter: DALO will exclude a tenderer which has unpaid overdue debt of DKK 100,000 or more\n to public authorities in relation to taxes under Danish law or under the law of the\n country in which the tenderer is established, unless the tenderer has provided or\n will provide collateral for the overdue debt or has entered into an instalment agreement\n which has not been breached.\n \n \n \n 5 Delkontrakt5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0001Titel: LOT 1 - Vehicle Charger\n Beskrivelse: Charger for tactical batteries for integration in vehicles.
The Vehicle Charger\n shall be integrated in and be powered by military vehicles, both wheeled and tracked,\n while moving in terrain and at standstill. The Vehicle Charger shall be installed\n inside or outside the vehicle and shall display battery status for each battery docked.\n Intern ID: d7b30507-1af2-4c52-aa71-a6caf8841ce5\n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Varer\n Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 31000000 Elektriske maskiner, apparatur, udstyr og forbrugsartikler; belysning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31111000 Adaptere\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31681500 Opladere\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedPostadresse: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark)\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 100.000.000 Dansk krone\n Rammeaftalens maksimumværdi: 150.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Dette udbud er også egnet for små og mellemstore virksomheder (SMV'er): ja\n Oplysninger om tidligere bekendtgørelser:ID for den foregående bekendtgørelse: 117908-2025\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 1:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 1 is DKK 100.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 1 is DKK 150.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT\n 1 are set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of\n the framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values\n is the uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below.\n Hence, the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value\n of the framework agreement for LOT 1 at the present moment, while the maximum value\n constitutes the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT\n 1 in its duration.
The uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework\n agreement for LOT 1 is primarily caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs\n of the Danish Defence through the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 1,\n including in particular uncertainty about specific deployments and mission areas,\n which is not possible to foresee for the entire span of the framework agreement under\n LOT 1. Thus, changes to the operational needs of the Danish Defence compared to the\n existing situation and needs may cause a significantly larger expenditure under the\n framework agreement under LOT 1 than what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION\n OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited\n for the second stage of the procedure\" and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited\n for the second stage of the procedure\" it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates\n by applying the criteria stated in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives\n no more than 5 compliant requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular\n legal form is required. If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g.\n a consortium), the participants shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint\n one supplier to represent the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The\n agreement will be concluded by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry\n of Defence, including all units of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the\n Chief of Defence, is entitled to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and\n conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please\n note that, due to a technical error, the contracting authority has been required to\n indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure will take place in successive\n stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.” For the avoidance of\n doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Referencer på specificerede leverancerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of chargers for tactical\n batteries that are designed for installation and integration in vehicles. Such Vehicles\n include those used by the military, police, emergency services, security services\n or similar. The chargers must be powered by the vehicle itself and be capable of operating\n under conditions associated with such use, including vibration, mechanical stress\n and varying and potentially challenging operational and environmental conditions.
The\n list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description\n should include a clear indication of which specific parts of the deliveries that are\n similar to the procurement described in section \"Description of the procurement\" and\n the requirement specification in relation to the lot in respect of which prequalification\n is applied for. The description should also include a description of the candidates’\n participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should contain\n information on the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume and value of the\n deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred,\n but not necessary; if no country-specific information is included, the candidate is\n asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery).
When\n specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date of commencement\n and completion. If this is not possible, for example if the delivery in question was\n performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc.,\n it should be stated in the description of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only\n the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request\n to participate will be considered when assessing which candidate has documented the\n most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only\n the part of the delivery which is completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery\n (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the\n time of the deadline for submission of request to participate, this particular part\n will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it\n is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with regard to size,\n value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed\n at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n Kriteriet vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive udelukket\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterSprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk\n Frist for anmodning om yderligere oplysninger: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Obligatorisk angivelse af underentreprise: Ingen angivelse med hensyn til underentreprise\n Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk, dansk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Oplysninger om finansiering og betaling: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Underentreprise:Der gælder ingen forpligtelse med hensyn til underentreprise.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale uden fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint\n apply:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed\n with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting\n the day after the contracting entity has sent notification to the candidates involved,\n provided that the notification includes an account of the reasons for the decision,\n see section 7(1).
In accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be\n filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar\n days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of\n the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The\n deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2)\n Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity\n has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into\n if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.\n
3) Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement\n calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates\n and tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from\n the day after the contracting entity has submitted notification of its decision, see\n section 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must\n inform the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously\n with the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating\n whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4).\n If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must\n also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see\n section 12(1).
The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance\n note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0002Titel: LOT 2 - Desktop Charger\n Beskrivelse: Charger/discharger for tactical batteries for use in office-like environments.
The\n Desktop Charger shall be used in static and protected environments (places like offices,\n laboratories, containers and tents) powered by AC source. The Desktop Charger shall\n charge and recondition batteries and discharge batteries to a selective SoC (state\n of charge) for transport.\n Intern ID: 7dcad820-68f9-4a45-b80a-ef48aefc69a6\n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Varer\n Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 31000000 Elektriske maskiner, apparatur, udstyr og forbrugsartikler; belysning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31111000 Adaptere\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31681500 Opladere\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedPostadresse: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 23.000.000 Dansk krone\n Rammeaftalens maksimumværdi: 35.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Dette udbud er også egnet for små og mellemstore virksomheder (SMV'er): ja\n Oplysninger om tidligere bekendtgørelser:ID for den foregående bekendtgørelse: 117908-2025\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 2:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 2 is DKK 23.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 2 is DKK 35.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 2 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 2 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 2 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 2 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 2, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 2. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 2 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tenderprocedure.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Referencer på specificerede leverancerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries that are designed for\n use in office-like or similar controlled environments. Such office-likes environments\n include office facilities, laboratories, containers (including military containers),\n tents, or similar settings.
The list should preferably include a short description\n of each delivery. The description should include a clear indication of which specific\n parts of the deliveries that are similar to the procurement described in section \"Description\n of the procurement\" and the requirement specification in relation to the lot in respect\n of which prequalification is applied for. The description should also include a description\n of the candidates’ participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description\n should contain information on the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume\n and value of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries\n are preferred, but not necessary; if no country-specific information is included,\n the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the\n delivery).
When specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should\n state the date of commencement and completion. If this is not possible, for example\n if the delivery in question was performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement,\n licence agreement, etc., it should be stated in the description of the delivery how\n the date is specified.
Only the deliveries (references) performed at the\n time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered when assessing\n which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery\n in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the delivery which is completed at\n the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate which will be included\n in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery\n has not been completed at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate,\n this particular part will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference).\n Therefore, it is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with\n regard to size, value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference)\n that has been completed at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n Kriteriet vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive udelukket\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterSprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk\n Frist for anmodning om yderligere oplysninger: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Obligatorisk angivelse af underentreprise: Ingen angivelse med hensyn til underentreprise\n Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk, dansk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Oplysninger om finansiering og betaling: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Underentreprise:Der gælder ingen forpligtelse med hensyn til underentreprise.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale uden fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint\n apply:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed\n with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting\n the day after the contracting entity has sent notification to the candidates involved,\n provided that the notification includes an account of the reasons for the decision,\n see section 7(1).
In accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be\n filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar\n days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of\n the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The\n deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2)\n Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity\n has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into\n if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3)\n Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated\n from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and\n tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the\n day after the contracting entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform\n the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with\n the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating\n whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4).\n If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must\n also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see\n section 12(1).
The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance\n note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0003Titel: LOT 3 - Power Scavenger\n Beskrivelse: Power Scavenger for tactical batteries for a single soldier.
The Power Scavenger\n shall be rugged for use in operational environments subject to weather and climate\n conditions. The Power Scavenger shall be powered by DC source (including, but not\n limited to AC/DC power bricks, vehicles, batteries, solar, wind, hydro and fuel cell).\n Charger shall mount to vest via MOLLE system or equivalent.\n Intern ID: d8ab0584-6e13-497a-be93-3f39990e205e\n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Varer\n Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 31000000 Elektriske maskiner, apparatur, udstyr og forbrugsartikler; belysning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31111000 Adaptere\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31681500 Opladere\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedPostadresse: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 16.500.000 Dansk krone\n Rammeaftalens maksimumværdi: 25.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Dette udbud er også egnet for små og mellemstore virksomheder (SMV'er): ja\n Oplysninger om tidligere bekendtgørelser:ID for den foregående bekendtgørelse: 117908-2025\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 3:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 3 is DKK 16.500.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 3 is DKK 25.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 3 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 3 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 3 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 1 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 3, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 3. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 3 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Referencer på specificerede leverancerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of chargers for tactical\n batteries that are designed to be used by individual personnel and which are designed\n for use in operational environments, including exposure to varying weather conditions.\n Such individual personnel include military personnel, police personnel, emergency\n services personnel, security personnel or similar personnel.
The list should\n preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description should include\n a clear indication of which specific parts of the deliveries that are similar to the\n procurement described in section \"Description of the procurement\" and the requirement\n specification in relation to the lot in respect of which prequalification is applied\n for. The description should also include a description of the candidates’ participation/role\n in the performance of the deliveries. The description should contain information on\n the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume and value of the deliveries,\n the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred, but not\n necessary; if no country-specific information is included, the candidate is asked\n to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery).
When\n specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date of commencement\n and completion. If this is not possible, for example if the delivery in question was\n performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc.,\n it should be stated in the description of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only\n the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request\n to participate will be considered when assessing which candidate has documented the\n most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only\n the part of the delivery which is completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery\n (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the\n time of the deadline for submission of request to participate, this particular part\n will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it\n is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with regard to size,\n value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed\n at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n Kriteriet vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive udelukket\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterSprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk\n Frist for anmodning om yderligere oplysninger: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Obligatorisk angivelse af underentreprise: Ingen angivelse med hensyn til underentreprise\n Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Oplysninger om finansiering og betaling: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Underentreprise:Der gælder ingen forpligtelse med hensyn til underentreprise.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale uden fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint\n apply:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed\n with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting\n the day after the contracting entity has sent notification to the candidates involved,\n provided that the notification includes an account of the reasons for the decision,\n see section 7(1).
In accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be\n filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar\n days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of\n the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The\n deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2)\n Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity\n has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into\n if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3)\n Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated\n from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and\n tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the\n day after the contracting entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform\n the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with\n the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating\n whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4).\n If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must\n also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see\n section 12(1).
The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance\n note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0004Titel: LOT 4 - Radio Power Adapter\n Beskrivelse: Adapter with built-in power supply for radio and charger for radio battery.
The\n Radio Power Adapter shall be rugged subject to tactical use and weather conditions.\n The Radio Power Adapter shall be installed between the radio and the radio battery,\n and shall power the radio and charge the radio battery simultaneously from external\n DC source or a soldier worn battery.\n Intern ID: 3a975cc8-8bc9-4c3f-b38c-14061d357f7e\n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Varer\n Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 31000000 Elektriske maskiner, apparatur, udstyr og forbrugsartikler; belysning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31111000 Adaptere\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31681500 Opladere\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedPostadresse: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 20.000.000 Dansk krone\n Rammeaftalens maksimumværdi: 30.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Dette udbud er også egnet for små og mellemstore virksomheder (SMV'er): ja\n Oplysninger om tidligere bekendtgørelser:ID for den foregående bekendtgørelse: 117908-2025\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 4:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 4 is DKK 20.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 4 is DKK 30.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 4 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 4 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 4 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 4 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 4, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 4. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 4 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Referencer på specificerede leverancerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of radio power adapters\n or similar power solutions that are designed to be used with communication equipment\n and capable of operating under varying weather conditions, delivered to, for example,\n military personnel, police personnel, emergency services, security services or similar.
The\n list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description\n should include a clear indication of which specific parts of the deliveries that are\n similar to the procurement described in section \"Description of the procurement\" and\n the requirement specification in relation to the lot in respect of which prequalification\n is applied for. The description should also include a description of the candidates’\n participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should contain\n information on the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume and value of the\n deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred,\n but not necessary; if no country-specific information is included, the candidate is\n asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery).
When\n specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date of commencement\n and completion. If this is not possible, for example if the delivery in question was\n performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc.,\n it should be stated in the description of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only\n the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request\n to participate will be considered when assessing which candidate has documented the\n most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only\n the part of the delivery which is completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery\n (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the\n time of the deadline for submission of request to participate, this particular part\n will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it\n is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with regard to size,\n value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed\n at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n Kriteriet vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive udelukket\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterSprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk\n Frist for anmodning om yderligere oplysninger: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Obligatorisk angivelse af underentreprise: Ingen angivelse med hensyn til underentreprise\n Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk, dansk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Oplysninger om finansiering og betaling: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Underentreprise:Der gælder ingen forpligtelse med hensyn til underentreprise.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale uden fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint\n apply:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed\n with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting\n the day after the contracting entity has sent notification to the candidates involved,\n provided that the notification includes an account of the reasons for the decision,\n see section 7(1).
In accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be\n filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar\n days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of\n the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The\n deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2)\n Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity\n has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into\n if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3)\n Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated\n from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and\n tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the\n day after the contracting entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform\n the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with\n the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating\n whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4).\n If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must\n also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see\n section 12(1).
The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance\n note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0005Titel: LOT 5 - Workshop Rack\n Beskrivelse: Bulk charger/discharger/analyser for tactical batteries in a rack for workshop use.
The\n Workshop Rack shall be used in a static and protected workshop environment powered\n by AC source. The Workshop Rack shall charge, discharge and analyse multiple batteries\n simultaneously. Multiple different battery types shall be serviced at the same time.\n The Workshop Rack shall be able to export the collected battery data for long term\n analysis.\n Intern ID: dfb97f0b-e826-48b8-964b-32861c613aed\n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Varer\n Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 31000000 Elektriske maskiner, apparatur, udstyr og forbrugsartikler; belysning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31111000 Adaptere\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31681500 Opladere\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedPostadresse: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 20.000.000 Dansk krone\n Rammeaftalens maksimumværdi: 30.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Dette udbud er også egnet for små og mellemstore virksomheder (SMV'er): ja\n Oplysninger om tidligere bekendtgørelser:ID for den foregående bekendtgørelse: 117908-2025\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 5:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 5 is DKK 20.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 5 is DKK 30.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 5 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 5 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 5 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 5 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 5, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 5. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 5 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Referencer på specificerede leverancerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of charger-, discharger-,\n analyser- and data extraction systems for tactical batteries integrated in rack-based\n solutions that are designed for workshop use, and which are designed for operation\n in static, controlled and protected indoor environments powered by standard wall outlets.\n Such environments include workshops, laboratories or similar facilities.
The\n list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description\n should include a clear indication of which specific parts of the deliveries that are\n similar to the procurement described in section \"Description of the procurement\" and\n the requirement specification in relation to the lot in respect of which prequalification\n is applied for. The description should also include a description of the candidates’\n participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should contain\n information on the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume and value of the\n deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred,\n but not necessary; if no country-specific information is included, the candidate is\n asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery).
When\n specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date of commencement\n and completion. If this is not possible, for example if the delivery in question was\n performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc.,\n it should be stated in the description of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only\n the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request\n to participate will be considered when assessing which candidate has documented the\n most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only\n the part of the delivery which is completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery\n (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the\n time of the deadline for submission of request to participate, this particular part\n will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it\n is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with regard to size,\n value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed\n at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n Kriteriet vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive udelukket\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterSprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk\n Frist for anmodning om yderligere oplysninger: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Obligatorisk angivelse af underentreprise: Ingen angivelse med hensyn til underentreprise\n Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk, dansk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and
follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the
tender documents.\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Oplysninger om finansiering og betaling: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Underentreprise:Der gælder ingen forpligtelse med hensyn til underentreprise.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale uden fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint
apply:
Complaints\n regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed with The Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n entity has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes an account of the reasons for the decision, see section 7(1).
In\n accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar days after the contracting entity\n has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union that the contracting\n entity has entered into an agreement. The deadline is calculated from the day after\n the day when the notice was published.
2) Thirty calendar days calculated from\n the day after the day when the contracting entity has notified the candidates concerned\n that an agreement based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or\n a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into if the notification has included\n an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3) Six months after the\n contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated from the day after\n the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and tenderers concerned,\n see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day after the contracting\n entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section 185(2) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform the contracting entity\n of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with the lodging of the\n complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating whether the complaint\n has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4). If the complaint has not\n been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must also state whether it is\n requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see section 12(1).
The\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance note concerning complaints\n is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Delkontrakt: LOT-0006Titel: LOT 6 - Field Suitcase\n Beskrivelse: Bulk charger/discharger/analyser for tactical batteries in a suitcase for fielded\n use.
The Field Suitcase shall be rugged subject to tactical use and weather\n conditions. The Field Suitcase shall charge, discharge and analyse multiple batteries\n simultaneously. Multiple different battery types shall be serviced at the same time.\n The Field Suitcase shall be able to export the collected battery data for long term\n analysis.\n Intern ID: da43a13f-eedf-4084-a10c-e8f634b8151c\n 5.1.1 FormålKontraktens hovedformål: Varer\n Supplerende kontrakttype: Tjenesteydelser\n Primær klassifikation (cpv): 31000000 Elektriske maskiner, apparatur, udstyr og forbrugsartikler; belysning\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31111000 Adaptere\n Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 31681500 Opladere\n \n 5.1.2 UdførelsesstedPostadresse: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n \n 5.1.4 FornyelseHøjeste antal fornyelser: 0\n \n 5.1.5 VærdiAnslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 20.000.000 Dansk krone\n Rammeaftalens maksimumværdi: 30.000.000 Dansk krone\n \n 5.1.6 Generelle oplysningerReserveret deltagelse: Deltagelse uden forbehold.\n Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler\n Dette udbud er også egnet for små og mellemstore virksomheder (SMV'er): ja\n Oplysninger om tidligere bekendtgørelser:ID for den foregående bekendtgørelse: 117908-2025\n \n Yderligere oplysninger: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 6:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 6 is DKK 20.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 6 is DKK 30.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 6 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 6 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 6 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 6 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 6, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 6. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 6 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 UdvælgelseskriterierKilder til udvælgelseskriterier: Bekendtgørelse\n Kriterium: Referencer på specificerede leverancerBeskrivelse af udvælgelseskriterium: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of portable charger-,\n discharger-, analyser- and data extraction systems for tactical batteries integrated\n in transportable suitcases or similar portable enclosures that are used to be used\n in forward or operational environments.
The list should preferably include\n a short description of each delivery. The description should include a clear indication\n of which specific parts of the deliveries that are similar to the procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\" and the requirement specification in relation\n to the lot in respect of which prequalification is applied for. The description should\n also include a description of the candidates’ participation/role in the performance\n of the deliveries. The description should contain information on the date of the deliveries,\n the size/quantity/volume and value of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries\n (specific names/countries are preferred, but not necessary; if no country-specific\n information is included, the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information\n as possible about the delivery).
When specifying the date for the deliveries,\n the candidate should state the date of commencement and completion. If this is not\n possible, for example if the delivery in question was performed on an ongoing basis\n under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc., it should be stated in the description\n of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only the deliveries (references)\n performed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered\n when assessing which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries.\n If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the delivery which\n is completed at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate\n which will be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Consequently,\n if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate, this particular part will not be included in the assessment\n of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it is important that the candidate clearly\n states which part (e.g. with regard to size, value, quantity or volume etc.) of an\n ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed at the time of the deadline for\n submission of request to participate.
The selection of candidates will be\n based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented the most relevant previous\n deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described in section \"Description\n of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the previous deliveries will\n be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the list of references submitted\n by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the information submitted is unclear\n or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively in the selection process.
In\n the evaluation, DALO will take the following into account, in particular:
- The\n degree of correspondence between the delivered products and the requirements of this\n lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
- More recent deliveries\n will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant than older deliveries,\n as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant operational capacity,
-\n The documented volume of deliveries under the reference. Substantial documented delivery\n volume will be considered particularly positive, as it demonstrates proven capacity\n to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical context of the deliveries,\n as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered the most relevant and will\n be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO countries which will\n be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n Kriteriet vil blive anvendt til at udvælge de ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren\n \n Oplysninger om den anden fase i en procedure, der afvikles i to faser:Mindsteantallet af ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Det højeste antal ansøgere, som skal opfordres til at deltage i anden fase af proceduren: 5\n Proceduren afvikles i successive faser. I hver fase kan nogle ansøgere blive udelukket\n \n \n 5.1.10 TildelingskriterierKriterium:\n \n Beskrivelse: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 TilbudsdokumenterSprog, som udbudsdokumenterne er officielt tilgængelige på: engelsk\n Frist for anmodning om yderligere oplysninger: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Adresse på udbudsdokumenterne: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 TilbudsvilkårVilkår for indgivelse:Obligatorisk angivelse af underentreprise: Ingen angivelse med hensyn til underentreprise\n Elektronisk indgivelse: Påkrævet\n Indgivelsesadresse: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Sprog, som tilbud og ansøgninger om deltagelse kan indgives på: engelsk, dansk\n Elektronisk katalog: Ikke tilladt\n Alternative tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Tilbudsgivere kan indgive mere end ét tilbud: Ikke tilladt\n Frist for modtagelse af anmodninger om deltagelse: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Betingelser for kontraktens udførelse:Udførelsen af kontrakten skal ske inden for rammerne af programmer for beskyttet beskæftigelse: Nej\n Vilkår relateret til kontraktens udførelse: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrævet\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk bestilling: nej\n Der vil blive anvendt elektronisk betaling: ja\n Oplysninger om finansiering og betaling: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Underentreprise:Der gælder ingen forpligtelse med hensyn til underentreprise.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TeknikkerRammeaftale:Rammeaftale uden fornyet iværksættelse af konkurrence\n Det maksimale antal deltagere: 1\n \n Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem\n \n \n 5.1.16 Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgangOrganisation med ansvar for klager: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Oplysninger om klagefrister: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint
apply:
Complaints\n regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed with The Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n entity has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes an account of the reasons for the decision, see section 7(1).
In\n accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar days after the contracting entity\n has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union that the contracting\n entity has entered into an agreement. The deadline is calculated from the day after\n the day when the notice was published.
2) Thirty calendar days calculated from\n the day after the day when the contracting entity has notified the candidates concerned\n that an agreement based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or\n a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into if the notification has included\n an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3) Six months after the\n contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated from the day after\n the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and tenderers concerned,\n see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day after the contracting\n entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section 185(2) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform the contracting entity\n of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with the lodging of the\n complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating whether the complaint\n has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4). If the complaint has not\n been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must also state whether it is\n requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see section 12(1).
The\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance note concerning complaints\n is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n \n 8 Organisationer8.1 ORG-0001Officielt navn: Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation\n Registreringsnummer: 16 28 71 80\n Postadresse: Lautrupbjerg 1-5 \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)\n \n \n E-mail: FMI-LA-FKO07@mil.dk\n \n Internetadresse: https://www.fmi.dk\n Denne organisations roller:\n Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0002Officielt navn: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Registreringsnummer: 37 79 55 26\n \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Vestjylland (DK041)\n \n E-mail: klfu@naevneneshus.dk\n \n Internetadresse: https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/\n Denne organisations roller:Organisation med ansvar for klager\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0003Officielt navn: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n Registreringsnummer: 10 29 48 19\n Postadresse: Carl Jacobsens Vej 35 \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n \n \n Internetadresse: https://www.kfst.dk\n Denne organisations roller:Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0004Officielt navn: Mercell Holding ASA\n Registreringsnummer: 980921565\n Postadresse: Askekroken 11 \n \n \n Landsdel (NUTS): Oslo (NO081)\n \n \n E-mail: publication@mercell.com\n \n \n Internetadresse: http://mercell.com/\n Denne organisations roller:\n \n \n \n Oplysninger om bekendtgørelsenBekendtgørelsens ID: 053d37d0-1148-45c6-ac0f-663d8b7ca332 - 01\n Formulartype: Konkurrencevilkår\n Bekendtgørelsestype: Udbuds- eller koncessionsbekendtgørelse – standardordningen\n Afsendelsesdato for bekendtgørelsen: 19-06-2026 13:13 +00:00\n Dato for afsendelse af bekendtgørelsen (eSender): 19-06-2026 13:15 +00:00\n Bekendtgørelsens officielle sprog: engelsk \n Bekendtgørelsesnummer: 00430675-2026\n \n Offentliggørelsesdato: 24-06-2026\n \n \n","htmlEN":"\n\n \n 1 Buyer1.1 BuyerOfficial name: Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation\n Legal type of the buyer: Central government authority\n The buyer is a contracting entity\n Activity of the contracting authority: Defence\n \n \n 2 Procedure2.1 ProcedureTitle: Framework Agreement regarding Chargers for Tactical Batteries\n Description: This tender concerns charging, discharging and analysis of tactical soldier batteries.\n
If the charger does not have built-in adapter for required batteries, then\n a number of adapters are to be expected to cover charging of required batteries.
The\n purpose of this tender is to strengthen the soldier’s ability to charge their batteries\n or swap them for fully charged ones at every phase during their mission.
TRAINING,\n SERVICES AND SPARE PARTS:
Three types of training courses are required: ’Basic’,\n ’Advanced’ and ’Specialist’.
- “Basic” covers the general use of the charger.
-\n “Advanced” covers major repairs and troubleshooting.
- “Specialist” covers all\n the workings of the charger to a level where a Specialist can train both a Basic user\n and an Advanced user.
Supplier shall offer technical consulting and services\n for repair of products.
It is noted that the framework agreement grants\n DALO a right to purchase spare parts to the chargers and/or adapters under certain\n specified conditions (see the framework agreement for details (the framework agreement\n is only available to prequalified applicants)).\n Procedure identifier: 461c0ef2-d95a-406c-b6b3-fe8f8d0a690b\n Internal identifier: fb68cc5b-f5aa-41b3-9ecc-8c8315a22b2c\n Type of procedure: Restricted\n The procedure is accelerated: no\n Main features of the procedure: REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION:
Please note that each candidate may only submit one\n request for participation for each lot.
DEADLINES:
- The deadline for\n applicants to submit questions is 29 July 2026 at 23:59 (local Danish time), cf. section\n \"Additional information deadline\". Due to technical reasons, the deadline is displayed\n as 23:55; however, the correct deadline is 23:59.
- DALO will respond to submitted\n questions no later than 5 August 2026 at 23:59 (local Danish time).
- Application\n deadline, cf. section \"Time limit for receipt of tenders or requests to participate\":\n 12 August 2026 at 10:00 (am) (local Danish time).
PREQUALIFICATION QUESTIONNARE:
DALO\n has prepared a prequalification questionnaire (“PQQ”) which the candidates are encouraged\n to use when submitting their applications. The PQQ contains enclosures and templates\n for providing information etc. in accordance with the requirements in this Contract\n Notice. However, it is emphasised that it is the sole responsibility of the candidate\n that the information provided fulfils the requirements. The PQQ is available in the\n electronic procurement system.
SELF-DECLARATION REGARDING NON-EXCLUSION AND\n DEBT:
When submitting the request for participation/prequalification, the candidate\n must submit a declaration stating that the candidate (1) is not subject to any of\n the mandatory grounds for exclusion stated in Article 39(1) of the Defence and Security\n Directive and (2) to which degree the candidate has unpaid overdue debt in relation\n to taxes or social security contributions under Danish law or under the law of the\n country in which the candidate is established. DALO reserves the right, at any time\n during the tender process, to let the candidate rectify a missing or inadequately\n completed self-declaration.
A template for the declaration is provided in\n the electronic tendering system, which the candidate must use.
If the candidate\n is composed of a group of entities (e.g. a consortium), including temporary joint\n ventures, or relies its technical and/or professional capacity on other entities,\n a declaration must be submitted for each participating entity.
Even if a\n candidate or a tenderer is subject to an exclusion ground, it will not be excluded\n if it has provided sufficient documentation that it is reliable. DALO will decide\n whether the documentation is sufficient. DALO’s assessment will be made according\n to the guidelines in section 138(1)-(4) of the Danish Act no. 1564 of 15 December\n 2015, as amended (the “Public Procurement Act”).
SELF-DECLARATION REGARDING\n LABOUR CLAUSES, CSR OBLIGATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS:
As part of the request\n to participate, the candidate must also submit a self-declaration on compliance with\n labour clauses, CSR obligations and international sanctions. DALO reserves the right,\n at any time during the tender process, to let the candidate rectify a missing or inadequately\n completed self-declaration.
DALO has uploaded a template (available in the\n electronic tender system) which must be used as a declaration.
Where groups\n of entities (e.g. consortiums), including temporary joint ventures, participate jointly\n in the tender procedure, or the candidate relies its technical and/or professional\n capacity on other entities, the declaration must be provided separately for each of\n the participating entities.
LETTER OF COMFORT:
According to the Defence\n and Security Directive, a candidate may rely on the economic and financial standing\n and/or technical and/or professional capacity of other entities, regardless of the\n legal nature of the links with the entities. If a candidate intends to rely on other\n entities and wants the capacity of such other entities to be taken into account when\n DALO assesses the suitability of the candidate, the candidate must prove that the\n other entities will and are obliged to provide the relevant resources at the disposal\n of the candidate. A template for a declaration from the supporting entity to this\n effect is included in the PQQ referred to above.
APPLICATION DOCUMENTS:
A\n request to participate in the prequalification phase consists of the following completed\n documents:
- Prequalification Questionnare (PQQ)
- Enclosure 1 - Declaration\n regarding non-exclusion and debt to public authorities
- Enclosure 2 - Self-declaration\n on compliance with Corporate Social Responsibility and international sanctions
-\n Template 1 - Consortium Declaration (if relevant)
- Template 2 - Letter of comfort\n - Technical and professional capacity (if relevant)
- Template 3 - Information\n regarding technical and professional capacity\n 2.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Additional nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 31000000 Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting\n Additional classification (cpv): 31111000 Adapters\n Additional classification (cpv): 31681500 Rechargers\n \n 2.1.2 Place of performancePostal address: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Additional information: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n 2.1.3 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 199.500.000 Danish krone\n Maximum value of the framework agreement: 300.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 2.1.4 General information\n \n The Defence and Security Directive (Directive 2009/81/EC) - The Defence and Security Directive (Directive 2009/81/EC) is implemented in Danish\n law by Ministerial Order for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts\n and service contracts in the fields of defence and security (Ministerial Order No.\n 1077 of 29 June 2022), which also contains supplementary provisions.\n \n 2.1.5 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Maximum number of lots for which one tenderer can submit tenders: 6\n \n Terms of contract:Maximum number of lots for which contracts can be awarded to one tenderer: 6\n \n \n 2.1.6 Grounds for exclusionSources of grounds for exclusion: Notice\n Corruption: See Article 39(1)(b) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Fraud: See Article 39(1)(c) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Money laundering or terrorist financing: See Article 39(1)(e) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Participation in a criminal organisation: See Article 39(1)(a) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities: See Article 39(1)(d) of the Defense and Security Directive.\n Breaching obligation relating to payment of social security contributions: DALO will exclude a tenderer which has unpaid overdue debt of DKK 100,000 or more\n to public authorities in relation to social security contributions under Danish law\n or under the law of the country in which the tenderer is established, unless the tenderer\n has provided or will provide collateral for the overdue debt or has entered into an\n instalment agreement which has not been breached.\n Breaching obligation relating to payment of taxes: DALO will exclude a tenderer which has unpaid overdue debt of DKK 100,000 or more\n to public authorities in relation to taxes under Danish law or under the law of the\n country in which the tenderer is established, unless the tenderer has provided or\n will provide collateral for the overdue debt or has entered into an instalment agreement\n which has not been breached.\n \n \n \n 5 Lot5.1 Lot: LOT-0001Title: LOT 1 - Vehicle Charger\n Description: Charger for tactical batteries for integration in vehicles.
The Vehicle Charger\n shall be integrated in and be powered by military vehicles, both wheeled and tracked,\n while moving in terrain and at standstill. The Vehicle Charger shall be installed\n inside or outside the vehicle and shall display battery status for each battery docked.\n Internal identifier: d7b30507-1af2-4c52-aa71-a6caf8841ce5\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Additional nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 31000000 Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting\n Additional classification (cpv): 31111000 Adapters\n Additional classification (cpv): 31681500 Rechargers\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performancePostal address: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Additional information: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark)\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 100.000.000 Danish krone\n Maximum value of the framework agreement: 150.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): yes\n Information about previous notices:Identifier of the previous notice: 117908-2025\n \n Additional information: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 1:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 1 is DKK 100.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 1 is DKK 150.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT\n 1 are set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of\n the framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values\n is the uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below.\n Hence, the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value\n of the framework agreement for LOT 1 at the present moment, while the maximum value\n constitutes the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT\n 1 in its duration.
The uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework\n agreement for LOT 1 is primarily caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs\n of the Danish Defence through the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 1,\n including in particular uncertainty about specific deployments and mission areas,\n which is not possible to foresee for the entire span of the framework agreement under\n LOT 1. Thus, changes to the operational needs of the Danish Defence compared to the\n existing situation and needs may cause a significantly larger expenditure under the\n framework agreement under LOT 1 than what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION\n OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited\n for the second stage of the procedure\" and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited\n for the second stage of the procedure\" it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates\n by applying the criteria stated in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives\n no more than 5 compliant requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular\n legal form is required. If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g.\n a consortium), the participants shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint\n one supplier to represent the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The\n agreement will be concluded by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry\n of Defence, including all units of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the\n Chief of Defence, is entitled to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and\n conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please\n note that, due to a technical error, the contracting authority has been required to\n indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure will take place in successive\n stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.” For the avoidance of\n doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: References on specified deliveriesDescription of selection criterion: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of chargers for tactical\n batteries that are designed for installation and integration in vehicles. Such Vehicles\n include those used by the military, police, emergency services, security services\n or similar. The chargers must be powered by the vehicle itself and be capable of operating\n under conditions associated with such use, including vibration, mechanical stress\n and varying and potentially challenging operational and environmental conditions.
The\n list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description\n should include a clear indication of which specific parts of the deliveries that are\n similar to the procurement described in section \"Description of the procurement\" and\n the requirement specification in relation to the lot in respect of which prequalification\n is applied for. The description should also include a description of the candidates’\n participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should contain\n information on the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume and value of the\n deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred,\n but not necessary; if no country-specific information is included, the candidate is\n asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery).
When\n specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date of commencement\n and completion. If this is not possible, for example if the delivery in question was\n performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc.,\n it should be stated in the description of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only\n the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request\n to participate will be considered when assessing which candidate has documented the\n most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only\n the part of the delivery which is completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery\n (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the\n time of the deadline for submission of request to participate, this particular part\n will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it\n is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with regard to size,\n value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed\n at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsLanguages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English\n Deadline for requesting additional information: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Address of the procurement documents: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Obligatory indication of subcontracting: No subcontracting indication\n Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English, Danish\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Subcontracting:No subcontracting obligation applies.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, without reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint\n apply:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed\n with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting\n the day after the contracting entity has sent notification to the candidates involved,\n provided that the notification includes an account of the reasons for the decision,\n see section 7(1).
In accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be\n filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar\n days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of\n the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The\n deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2)\n Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity\n has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into\n if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.\n
3) Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement\n calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates\n and tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from\n the day after the contracting entity has submitted notification of its decision, see\n section 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must\n inform the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously\n with the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating\n whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4).\n If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must\n also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see\n section 12(1).
The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance\n note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure: Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0002Title: LOT 2 - Desktop Charger\n Description: Charger/discharger for tactical batteries for use in office-like environments.
The\n Desktop Charger shall be used in static and protected environments (places like offices,\n laboratories, containers and tents) powered by AC source. The Desktop Charger shall\n charge and recondition batteries and discharge batteries to a selective SoC (state\n of charge) for transport.\n Internal identifier: 7dcad820-68f9-4a45-b80a-ef48aefc69a6\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Additional nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 31000000 Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting\n Additional classification (cpv): 31111000 Adapters\n Additional classification (cpv): 31681500 Rechargers\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performancePostal address: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Additional information: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 23.000.000 Danish krone\n Maximum value of the framework agreement: 35.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): yes\n Information about previous notices:Identifier of the previous notice: 117908-2025\n \n Additional information: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 2:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 2 is DKK 23.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 2 is DKK 35.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 2 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 2 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 2 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 2 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 2, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 2. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 2 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tenderprocedure.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: References on specified deliveriesDescription of selection criterion: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries that are designed for\n use in office-like or similar controlled environments. Such office-likes environments\n include office facilities, laboratories, containers (including military containers),\n tents, or similar settings.
The list should preferably include a short description\n of each delivery. The description should include a clear indication of which specific\n parts of the deliveries that are similar to the procurement described in section \"Description\n of the procurement\" and the requirement specification in relation to the lot in respect\n of which prequalification is applied for. The description should also include a description\n of the candidates’ participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description\n should contain information on the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume\n and value of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries\n are preferred, but not necessary; if no country-specific information is included,\n the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the\n delivery).
When specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should\n state the date of commencement and completion. If this is not possible, for example\n if the delivery in question was performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement,\n licence agreement, etc., it should be stated in the description of the delivery how\n the date is specified.
Only the deliveries (references) performed at the\n time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered when assessing\n which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery\n in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the delivery which is completed at\n the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate which will be included\n in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery\n has not been completed at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate,\n this particular part will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference).\n Therefore, it is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with\n regard to size, value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference)\n that has been completed at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsLanguages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English\n Deadline for requesting additional information: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Address of the procurement documents: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Obligatory indication of subcontracting: No subcontracting indication\n Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English, Danish\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Subcontracting:No subcontracting obligation applies.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, without reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint\n apply:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed\n with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting\n the day after the contracting entity has sent notification to the candidates involved,\n provided that the notification includes an account of the reasons for the decision,\n see section 7(1).
In accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be\n filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar\n days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of\n the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The\n deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2)\n Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity\n has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into\n if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3)\n Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated\n from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and\n tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the\n day after the contracting entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform\n the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with\n the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating\n whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4).\n If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must\n also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see\n section 12(1).
The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance\n note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0003Title: LOT 3 - Power Scavenger\n Description: Power Scavenger for tactical batteries for a single soldier.
The Power Scavenger\n shall be rugged for use in operational environments subject to weather and climate\n conditions. The Power Scavenger shall be powered by DC source (including, but not\n limited to AC/DC power bricks, vehicles, batteries, solar, wind, hydro and fuel cell).\n Charger shall mount to vest via MOLLE system or equivalent.\n Internal identifier: d8ab0584-6e13-497a-be93-3f39990e205e\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Additional nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 31000000 Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting\n Additional classification (cpv): 31111000 Adapters\n Additional classification (cpv): 31681500 Rechargers\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performancePostal address: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Additional information: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 16.500.000 Danish krone\n Maximum value of the framework agreement: 25.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): yes\n Information about previous notices:Identifier of the previous notice: 117908-2025\n \n Additional information: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 3:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 3 is DKK 16.500.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 3 is DKK 25.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 3 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 3 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 3 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 1 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 3, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 3. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 3 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: References on specified deliveriesDescription of selection criterion: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of chargers for tactical\n batteries that are designed to be used by individual personnel and which are designed\n for use in operational environments, including exposure to varying weather conditions.\n Such individual personnel include military personnel, police personnel, emergency\n services personnel, security personnel or similar personnel.
The list should\n preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description should include\n a clear indication of which specific parts of the deliveries that are similar to the\n procurement described in section \"Description of the procurement\" and the requirement\n specification in relation to the lot in respect of which prequalification is applied\n for. The description should also include a description of the candidates’ participation/role\n in the performance of the deliveries. The description should contain information on\n the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume and value of the deliveries,\n the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred, but not\n necessary; if no country-specific information is included, the candidate is asked\n to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery).
When\n specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date of commencement\n and completion. If this is not possible, for example if the delivery in question was\n performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc.,\n it should be stated in the description of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only\n the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request\n to participate will be considered when assessing which candidate has documented the\n most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only\n the part of the delivery which is completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery\n (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the\n time of the deadline for submission of request to participate, this particular part\n will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it\n is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with regard to size,\n value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed\n at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsLanguages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English\n Deadline for requesting additional information: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Address of the procurement documents: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Obligatory indication of subcontracting: No subcontracting indication\n Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Subcontracting:No subcontracting obligation applies.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, without reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint\n apply:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed\n with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting\n the day after the contracting entity has sent notification to the candidates involved,\n provided that the notification includes an account of the reasons for the decision,\n see section 7(1).
In accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be\n filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar\n days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of\n the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The\n deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2)\n Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity\n has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into\n if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3)\n Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated\n from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and\n tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the\n day after the contracting entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform\n the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with\n the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating\n whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4).\n If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must\n also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see\n section 12(1).
The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance\n note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0004Title: LOT 4 - Radio Power Adapter\n Description: Adapter with built-in power supply for radio and charger for radio battery.
The\n Radio Power Adapter shall be rugged subject to tactical use and weather conditions.\n The Radio Power Adapter shall be installed between the radio and the radio battery,\n and shall power the radio and charge the radio battery simultaneously from external\n DC source or a soldier worn battery.\n Internal identifier: 3a975cc8-8bc9-4c3f-b38c-14061d357f7e\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Additional nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 31000000 Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting\n Additional classification (cpv): 31111000 Adapters\n Additional classification (cpv): 31681500 Rechargers\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performancePostal address: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Additional information: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 20.000.000 Danish krone\n Maximum value of the framework agreement: 30.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): yes\n Information about previous notices:Identifier of the previous notice: 117908-2025\n \n Additional information: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 4:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 4 is DKK 20.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 4 is DKK 30.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 4 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 4 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 4 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 4 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 4, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 4. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 4 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: References on specified deliveriesDescription of selection criterion: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of radio power adapters\n or similar power solutions that are designed to be used with communication equipment\n and capable of operating under varying weather conditions, delivered to, for example,\n military personnel, police personnel, emergency services, security services or similar.
The\n list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description\n should include a clear indication of which specific parts of the deliveries that are\n similar to the procurement described in section \"Description of the procurement\" and\n the requirement specification in relation to the lot in respect of which prequalification\n is applied for. The description should also include a description of the candidates’\n participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should contain\n information on the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume and value of the\n deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred,\n but not necessary; if no country-specific information is included, the candidate is\n asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery).
When\n specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date of commencement\n and completion. If this is not possible, for example if the delivery in question was\n performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc.,\n it should be stated in the description of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only\n the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request\n to participate will be considered when assessing which candidate has documented the\n most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only\n the part of the delivery which is completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery\n (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the\n time of the deadline for submission of request to participate, this particular part\n will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it\n is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with regard to size,\n value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed\n at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsLanguages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English\n Deadline for requesting additional information: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Address of the procurement documents: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Obligatory indication of subcontracting: No subcontracting indication\n Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English, Danish\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Subcontracting:No subcontracting obligation applies.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, without reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint\n apply:
Complaints regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed\n with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting\n the day after the contracting entity has sent notification to the candidates involved,\n provided that the notification includes an account of the reasons for the decision,\n see section 7(1).
In accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be\n filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar\n days after the contracting entity has published a notice in the Official Journal of\n the European Union that the contracting entity has entered into an agreement. The\n deadline is calculated from the day after the day when the notice was published.
2)\n Thirty calendar days calculated from the day after the day when the contracting entity\n has notified the candidates concerned that an agreement based on a framework agreement\n with reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into\n if the notification has included an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3)\n Six months after the contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated\n from the day after the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and\n tenderers concerned, see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the\n day after the contracting entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section\n 185(2) of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform\n the contracting entity of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with\n the lodging of the complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating\n whether the complaint has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4).\n If the complaint has not been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must\n also state whether it is requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see\n section 12(1).
The Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance\n note concerning complaints is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0005Title: LOT 5 - Workshop Rack\n Description: Bulk charger/discharger/analyser for tactical batteries in a rack for workshop use.
The\n Workshop Rack shall be used in a static and protected workshop environment powered\n by AC source. The Workshop Rack shall charge, discharge and analyse multiple batteries\n simultaneously. Multiple different battery types shall be serviced at the same time.\n The Workshop Rack shall be able to export the collected battery data for long term\n analysis.\n Internal identifier: dfb97f0b-e826-48b8-964b-32861c613aed\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Additional nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 31000000 Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting\n Additional classification (cpv): 31111000 Adapters\n Additional classification (cpv): 31681500 Rechargers\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performancePostal address: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Additional information: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 20.000.000 Danish krone\n Maximum value of the framework agreement: 30.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): yes\n Information about previous notices:Identifier of the previous notice: 117908-2025\n \n Additional information: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 5:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 5 is DKK 20.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 5 is DKK 30.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 5 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 5 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 5 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 5 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 5, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 5. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 5 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: References on specified deliveriesDescription of selection criterion: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of charger-, discharger-,\n analyser- and data extraction systems for tactical batteries integrated in rack-based\n solutions that are designed for workshop use, and which are designed for operation\n in static, controlled and protected indoor environments powered by standard wall outlets.\n Such environments include workshops, laboratories or similar facilities.
The\n list should preferably include a short description of each delivery. The description\n should include a clear indication of which specific parts of the deliveries that are\n similar to the procurement described in section \"Description of the procurement\" and\n the requirement specification in relation to the lot in respect of which prequalification\n is applied for. The description should also include a description of the candidates’\n participation/role in the performance of the deliveries. The description should contain\n information on the date of the deliveries, the size/quantity/volume and value of the\n deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries (specific names/countries are preferred,\n but not necessary; if no country-specific information is included, the candidate is\n asked to provide as much generic information as possible about the delivery).
When\n specifying the date for the deliveries, the candidate should state the date of commencement\n and completion. If this is not possible, for example if the delivery in question was\n performed on an ongoing basis under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc.,\n it should be stated in the description of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only\n the deliveries (references) performed at the time of the deadline for the request\n to participate will be considered when assessing which candidate has documented the\n most relevant previous deliveries. If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only\n the part of the delivery which is completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate which will be included in the assessment of the delivery\n (reference). Consequently, if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the\n time of the deadline for submission of request to participate, this particular part\n will not be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it\n is important that the candidate clearly states which part (e.g. with regard to size,\n value, quantity or volume etc.) of an ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed\n at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate.
The\n selection of candidates will be based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented\n the most relevant previous deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the\n previous deliveries will be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the\n list of references submitted by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the\n information submitted is unclear or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively\n in the selection process.
In the evaluation, DALO will take the following\n into account, in particular:
- The degree of correspondence between the delivered\n products and the requirements of this lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
-\n More recent deliveries will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant\n than older deliveries, as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant\n operational capacity,
- The documented volume of deliveries under the reference.\n Substantial documented delivery volume will be considered particularly positive, as\n it demonstrates proven capacity to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical\n context of the deliveries, as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered\n the most relevant and will be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO\n countries which will be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsLanguages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English\n Deadline for requesting additional information: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Address of the procurement documents: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Obligatory indication of subcontracting: No subcontracting indication\n Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English, Danish\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and
follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the
tender documents.\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Subcontracting:No subcontracting obligation applies.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, without reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint
apply:
Complaints\n regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed with The Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n entity has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes an account of the reasons for the decision, see section 7(1).
In\n accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar days after the contracting entity\n has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union that the contracting\n entity has entered into an agreement. The deadline is calculated from the day after\n the day when the notice was published.
2) Thirty calendar days calculated from\n the day after the day when the contracting entity has notified the candidates concerned\n that an agreement based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or\n a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into if the notification has included\n an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3) Six months after the\n contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated from the day after\n the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and tenderers concerned,\n see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day after the contracting\n entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section 185(2) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform the contracting entity\n of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with the lodging of the\n complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating whether the complaint\n has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4). If the complaint has not\n been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must also state whether it is\n requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see section 12(1).
The\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance note concerning complaints\n is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n 5.1 Lot: LOT-0006Title: LOT 6 - Field Suitcase\n Description: Bulk charger/discharger/analyser for tactical batteries in a suitcase for fielded\n use.
The Field Suitcase shall be rugged subject to tactical use and weather\n conditions. The Field Suitcase shall charge, discharge and analyse multiple batteries\n simultaneously. Multiple different battery types shall be serviced at the same time.\n The Field Suitcase shall be able to export the collected battery data for long term\n analysis.\n Internal identifier: da43a13f-eedf-4084-a10c-e8f634b8151c\n 5.1.1 PurposeMain nature of the contract: Supplies\n Additional nature of the contract: Services\n Main classification (cpv): 31000000 Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting\n Additional classification (cpv): 31111000 Adapters\n Additional classification (cpv): 31681500 Rechargers\n \n 5.1.2 Place of performancePostal address: Lilholtvej 4B \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Sydjylland (DK032)\n \n Additional information: The deliveries shall be delivered DAP Incoterms 2020 at the place of performance,\n Lilholtvej 4B, 6500 Vojens (Denmark).\n \n 5.1.3 Estimated duration\n \n \n 5.1.5 ValueEstimated value excluding VAT: 20.000.000 Danish krone\n Maximum value of the framework agreement: 30.000.000 Danish krone\n \n 5.1.6 General informationReserved participation: Participation is not reserved.\n Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.\n This procurement is also suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): yes\n Information about previous notices:Identifier of the previous notice: 117908-2025\n \n Additional information: THE ESTIMATED / MAXIMUM VALUE OF LOT 6:
The estimated value of the framework agreement\n for LOT 6 is DKK 20.000.000,00, and the maximum value of the framework agreement for\n LOT 6 is DKK 30.000.000,00. The estimated value and the maximum value for LOT 6 are\n set out in the sections \"Estimated value excluding VAT\" and \"Maximum value of the\n framework agreement\". The reason for the difference between the stated values is the\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement, see below. Hence,\n the estimated value constitutes DALO’s most qualified estimate of the value of the\n framework agreement for LOT 6 at the present moment, while the maximum value constitutes\n the maximum value of purchases under the framework agreement under LOT 6 in its duration.
The\n uncertainty regarding the final value of the framework agreement for LOT 6 is primarily\n caused by uncertainty regarding the operational needs of the Danish Defence through\n the duration of the framework agreement under LOT 6, including in particular uncertainty\n about specific deployments and mission areas, which is not possible to foresee for\n the entire span of the framework agreement under LOT 6. Thus, changes to the operational\n needs of the Danish Defence compared to the existing situation and needs may cause\n a significantly larger expenditure under the framework agreement under LOT 6 than\n what is expected at the moment.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATES:
Regarding the\n sections \"Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n and \"Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\"\n it is specified that DALO will select 5 candidates by applying the criteria stated\n in the section \"Selection criteria\", unless DALO receives no more than 5 compliant\n requests for participation.
LEGAL FORM:
No particular legal form is required.\n If the agreement is awarded to a group of suppliers (e.g. a consortium), the participants\n shall undertake joint and several liability and appoint one supplier to represent\n the group.
CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT:
The agreement will be concluded\n by DALO. However, all divisions of the Danish Ministry of Defence, including all units\n of the Danish Defence subject to the command of the Chief of Defence, is entitled\n to use the agreement for procurement on the terms and conditions of the agreement.
INFORMATION\n ABOUT SUCCESSIVE STAGES:
Please note that, due to a technical error, the contracting\n authority has been required to indicate in this contract notice that: “The procedure\n will take place in successive stages. In each stage, some participants may be eliminated.”\n For the avoidance of doubt, no successive stages will be used in this tender procedure.\n \n 5.1.9 Selection criteriaSources of selection criteria: Notice\n Criterion: References on specified deliveriesDescription of selection criterion: The request to participate must include the most important similar deliveries (references)\n carried out prior to the deadline for request to participate. “Similar deliveries”\n shall mean deliveries which, in terms of design, function, complexity and technical\n specifications, correspond to the lot, including deliveries of portable charger-,\n discharger-, analyser- and data extraction systems for tactical batteries integrated\n in transportable suitcases or similar portable enclosures that are used to be used\n in forward or operational environments.
The list should preferably include\n a short description of each delivery. The description should include a clear indication\n of which specific parts of the deliveries that are similar to the procurement described\n in section \"Description of the procurement\" and the requirement specification in relation\n to the lot in respect of which prequalification is applied for. The description should\n also include a description of the candidates’ participation/role in the performance\n of the deliveries. The description should contain information on the date of the deliveries,\n the size/quantity/volume and value of the deliveries, the recipients of the deliveries\n (specific names/countries are preferred, but not necessary; if no country-specific\n information is included, the candidate is asked to provide as much generic information\n as possible about the delivery).
When specifying the date for the deliveries,\n the candidate should state the date of commencement and completion. If this is not\n possible, for example if the delivery in question was performed on an ongoing basis\n under a framework agreement, licence agreement, etc., it should be stated in the description\n of the delivery how the date is specified.
Only the deliveries (references)\n performed at the time of the deadline for the request to participate will be considered\n when assessing which candidate has documented the most relevant previous deliveries.\n If the delivery in question is ongoing, it is only the part of the delivery which\n is completed at the time of the deadline for submission of request to participate\n which will be included in the assessment of the delivery (reference). Consequently,\n if a part of the delivery has not been completed at the time of the deadline for submission\n of request to participate, this particular part will not be included in the assessment\n of the delivery (reference). Therefore, it is important that the candidate clearly\n states which part (e.g. with regard to size, value, quantity or volume etc.) of an\n ongoing delivery (reference) that has been completed at the time of the deadline for\n submission of request to participate.
The selection of candidates will be\n based on an evaluation of which candidates have documented the most relevant previous\n deliveries in relation to the agreement/procurement described in section \"Description\n of the procurement\". In the evaluation, the nature of the previous deliveries will\n be taken into account. The evaluation will be based on the list of references submitted\n by the candidates, see above. Please note that if the information submitted is unclear\n or unintelligible, this may be regarded negatively in the selection process.
In\n the evaluation, DALO will take the following into account, in particular:
- The\n degree of correspondence between the delivered products and the requirements of this\n lot, including functionality and technical characteristics,
- More recent deliveries\n will be assessed more favourably and will be deemed more relevant than older deliveries,\n as more recent deliveries demonstrate current and relevant operational capacity,
-\n The documented volume of deliveries under the reference. Substantial documented delivery\n volume will be considered particularly positive, as it demonstrates proven capacity\n to supply the deliveries at scale,
- The geographical context of the deliveries,\n as deliveries made to NATO countries will be considered the most relevant and will\n be assessed more favourably than deliveries made to non-NATO countries which will\n be considered of comparatively lower relevance.\n The criteria will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure\n \n Information about the second stage of a two-stage procedure:Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure: 5\n The procedure will take place in successive stages. At each stage, some participants may be eliminated\n \n \n 5.1.10 Award criteriaCriterion:\n \n Description: See Enclosure B – The award criterion and the evaluation method (lowest price) (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)Award criterion number: 100\n \n \n \n 5.1.11 Procurement documentsLanguages in which the procurement documents are officially available: English\n Deadline for requesting additional information: 29-07-2026 21:55 +00:00\n Address of the procurement documents: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial\n \n 5.1.12 Terms of procurementTerms of submission:Obligatory indication of subcontracting: No subcontracting indication\n Electronic submission: Required\n Address for submission: https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/homepage\n Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: English, Danish\n Electronic catalogue: Not allowed\n \n Tenderers may submit more than one tender: Not allowed\n Deadline for receipt of requests to participate: 12-08-2026 08:00 +00:00\n \n Terms of contract:The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No\n Conditions relating to the performance of the contract: The agreement contains requirements regarding labour clause, CSR requirements and\n international sanctions, as well as provisions regarding risk assessment and follow-up\n actions. In connection with the tendering for the agreement, the risk profile is assessed\n to the following follow-up action (risk level): B. Further information regarding the\n requirements and follow-up action is available on DALO’s webpage and will be included\n in the tender documents.\n Electronic invoicing: Required\n Electronic ordering will be used: no\n Electronic payment will be used: yes\n Financial arrangement: Payment shall take place no later than 30 days after the supplier has forwarded a\n satisfactory invoice to DALO. The specific payment terms will be included in the tender\n documents.
If the contracting party (the successful tenderer) is required\n to develop an adapter for the charger, the successful tenderer will be compensated\n for its development costs in accordance with the framework agreement (will only be\n published to prequalified applicants), Appendix 1.A, Appendix 1.B and Appendix 2 (will\n only be published to prequalified applicants).\n Subcontracting:No subcontracting obligation applies.\n \n \n \n 5.1.15 TechniquesFramework agreement:Framework agreement, without reopening of competition\n Maximum number of participants: 1\n \n Information about the dynamic purchasing system:No dynamic purchase system\n \n \n 5.1.16 Further information, mediation and reviewReview organisation: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Information about review deadlines: Pursuant to the Danish Consolidation (Act no. 593 of 2 June 2016, as amended) on the\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement, the following time-limits for filing a complaint
apply:
Complaints\n regarding a candidate not being prequalified must be filed with The Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting\n entity has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification\n includes an account of the reasons for the decision, see section 7(1).
In\n accordance with section 7(2) other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board\n for Public Procurement within:
1) 45 calendar days after the contracting entity\n has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union that the contracting\n entity has entered into an agreement. The deadline is calculated from the day after\n the day when the notice was published.
2) Thirty calendar days calculated from\n the day after the day when the contracting entity has notified the candidates concerned\n that an agreement based on a framework agreement with reopening of competition or\n a dynamic purchasing system has been entered into if the notification has included\n an explanation of the relevant grounds for the decision.
3) Six months after the\n contracting entity entered into a framework agreement calculated from the day after\n the day when the contracting entity notified the candidates and tenderers concerned,\n see section 2(2).
4) 20 calendar days calculated from the day after the contracting\n entity has submitted notification of its decision, see section 185(2) of the Danish\n Public Procurement Act.
The complainant must inform the contracting entity\n of the complaint in writing not later than simultaneously with the lodging of the\n complaint to The Complaints Board for Public Procurement stating whether the complaint\n has been lodged in the standstill period, see section 6(4). If the complaint has not\n been lodged in the standstill period, the complainant must also state whether it is\n requested that the appeal be granted suspensory effect, see section 12(1).
The\n Complaints Board for Public Procurement’s own guidance note concerning complaints\n is available on the Complaints Boards website.\n Organisation providing more information on the review procedures: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n \n \n \n 8 Organisations8.1 ORG-0001Official name: Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation\n Registration number: 16 28 71 80\n Postal address: Lautrupbjerg 1-5 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Københavns omegn (DK012)\n \n Contact point: Qaim Jaffarson\n Email: FMI-LA-FKO07@mil.dk\n Telephone: +45 72 81 49 85\n Internet address: https://www.fmi.dk\n Roles of this organisation:\n Organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0002Official name: Danish Complaints Board for Public Procurement\n Registration number: 37 79 55 26\n Postal address: Toldboden 2 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Vestjylland (DK041)\n \n Email: klfu@naevneneshus.dk\n Telephone: +45 72 40 5600\n Internet address: https://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0003Official name: Danish Competition and Consumer Authority\n Registration number: 10 29 48 19\n Postal address: Carl Jacobsens Vej 35 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Byen København (DK011)\n \n \n Telephone: +45 41 71 50 00\n Internet address: https://www.kfst.dk\n Roles of this organisation:Organisation providing more information on the review procedures\n \n \n 8.1 ORG-0004Official name: Mercell Holding ASA\n Registration number: 980921565\n Postal address: Askekroken 11 \n \n \n Country subdivision (NUTS): Oslo (NO081)\n \n \n Email: publication@mercell.com\n \n \n Internet address: http://mercell.com/\n Roles of this organisation:\n \n \n \n Notice informationNotice identifier/version: 053d37d0-1148-45c6-ac0f-663d8b7ca332 - 01\n \n Notice type: Contract or concession notice – standard regime\n Notice dispatch date: 19-06-2026 13:13 +00:00\n Notice dispatch date (eSender): 19-06-2026 13:15 +00:00\n Languages in which this notice is officially available: English \n Notice publication number: 00430675-2026\n OJ S issue number: 119/2026\n Publication date: 24-06-2026\n \n \n","opsummeringDA":{"card":{"titel":"Framework Agreement regarding Chargers for Tactical Batteries","ordregiver":"Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation","ordregiverId":"ORG-16-28-71-80","ordregiverIdDatavasket":"16287180","publiceringsdato":"2026-06-24+02:00","cpvKode":"31000000","cpvTitel":"Elektriske maskiner, apparatur, udstyr og forbrugsartikler; belysning","formulartype":"Konkurrencevilkår","formulartypeKode":"competition","tidsfrister":["2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z"],"alleOrdregivere":["Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation"],"anslaaetVaerdi":"199500000","anslaaetVaerdiValuta":"DKK","beskrivelse":"This tender concerns charging, discharging and analysis of tactical soldier batteries. \n\nIf the charger does not have built-in adapter for required batteries, then a number of adapters are to be expected to cover charging of required batteries.\n\nThe purpose of this tender is to strengthen the soldier’s ability to charge their batteries or swap them for fully charged ones at every phase during their mission.\n\nTRAINING, SERVICES AND SPARE PARTS:\nThree types of training courses are required: ’Basic’, ’Advanced’ and ’Specialist’.\n\n- “Basic” covers the general use of the charger.\n- “Advanced” covers major repairs and troubleshooting.\n- “Specialist” covers all the workings of the charger to a level where a Specialist can train both a Basic user and an Advanced user. \n\nSupplier shall offer technical consulting and services for repair of products. \n\nIt is noted that the framework agreement grants DALO a right to purchase spare parts to the chargers and/or adapters under certain specified conditions (see the framework agreement for details (the framework agreement is only available to prequalified applicants)).","bkSubTypeKode":"18","bkSubType":"Udbudsbekendtgørelse – forsvarsdirektivet, standardordningen","erAendring":false},"indholdsType":"HENTET_FRA_TED","sekundaereOrdregivere":[],"udforelsesstedNutsCode":["DK032"],"udforelsesstedSubLand":["Sydjylland"],"udforelsesstedLand":["Danmark"],"udforelsesstedBy":["Vojens"],"tilbudsfrister":[],"intressentfrister":[],"deltagelsefrister":["2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z"],"svarfrister":[],"antalParts":0,"antalLots":6,"udbudsDokumenter":["https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial"]},"opsummeringEN":{"card":{"titel":"Framework Agreement regarding Chargers for Tactical Batteries","ordregiver":"Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation","ordregiverId":"ORG-16-28-71-80","ordregiverIdDatavasket":"16287180","publiceringsdato":"2026-06-24+02:00","cpvKode":"31000000","cpvTitel":"Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting","formulartype":"Competition","formulartypeKode":"competition","tidsfrister":["2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z"],"alleOrdregivere":["Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation"],"anslaaetVaerdi":"199500000","anslaaetVaerdiValuta":"DKK","beskrivelse":"This tender concerns charging, discharging and analysis of tactical soldier batteries. \n\nIf the charger does not have built-in adapter for required batteries, then a number of adapters are to be expected to cover charging of required batteries.\n\nThe purpose of this tender is to strengthen the soldier’s ability to charge their batteries or swap them for fully charged ones at every phase during their mission.\n\nTRAINING, SERVICES AND SPARE PARTS:\nThree types of training courses are required: ’Basic’, ’Advanced’ and ’Specialist’.\n\n- “Basic” covers the general use of the charger.\n- “Advanced” covers major repairs and troubleshooting.\n- “Specialist” covers all the workings of the charger to a level where a Specialist can train both a Basic user and an Advanced user. \n\nSupplier shall offer technical consulting and services for repair of products. \n\nIt is noted that the framework agreement grants DALO a right to purchase spare parts to the chargers and/or adapters under certain specified conditions (see the framework agreement for details (the framework agreement is only available to prequalified applicants)).","bkSubTypeKode":"18","bkSubType":"Contract notice – defence directive, standard regime","erAendring":false},"indholdsType":"HENTET_FRA_TED","sekundaereOrdregivere":[],"udforelsesstedNutsCode":["DK032"],"udforelsesstedSubLand":["Sydjylland"],"udforelsesstedLand":["Denmark"],"udforelsesstedBy":["Vojens"],"tilbudsfrister":[],"intressentfrister":[],"deltagelsefrister":["2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z","2026-08-12T08:00:00Z"],"svarfrister":[],"antalParts":0,"antalLots":6,"udbudsDokumenter":["https://www.ethics.dk/ethics/eo#/65c63ef7-0cc0-4d7d-9bd2-79b947bef6a9/publicMaterial"]}}