Få besked, når der er ændringer til dette udbud Gem dette udbud under "Mine udbud"

Reduction of food loss and food waste: Support for the development of a voluntary agreement on reduction of food waste and food loss, and delivery of a catalogue of initiatives to reduce food waste and food loss along the supply chain

This procurement procedure comprises of 2 separate tasks:

1) Support for the Danish Think Tank on Prevention of Food Loss and Food Waste in the development of a voluntary agreement between businesses in the supply chain, and

2) the delivery of a catalogue describing initiatives to reduce food waste and food loss along the whole supply chain, building the ‘business case’ for a voluntary agreement and providing recommendations and suggestions for impactful activities.

The actual detailed description and the requirements of the tendered project appear from the specification of requirements, Appendix 2.

18/06/2019
We have received the following questions, which have been answered below:

Regarding the first separate task: Support in developing the voluntary agreement, should the work being done here be regarded purely as advisory support for the think tank who then produces process descriptions itself, or does the work also entail the production of specific process descriptions?

The work includes the production of the specific process description in writing.

What is meant by “in-depth description of the decision procedures” as a part of the delivery in the first specific task?

The voluntary agreement is an agreement between multiple companies and the organisers. We need a step by step description of the decision procedures, including input for the articles of association, and who has the mandate to decide what, but also a description of questions that could occur, and that could be a matter of “greyzone”.

In what format should the offer include presentations of team members?
The presentation of team members should include CVs and a description of relevant experience within the field of voluntary agreements.

Should we be ready to start the project in July?

We expect the work to start up in end of August.

The tender indicates an equal split of the budget for the two tasks, is this fixed? Our view is that the second deliverable is less complex.

Both tasks are equal as important to us, but we are open to discuss how much time that will be delegated to each task.

Do you have any specific priorities on the list of tasks? This could help us to focus the budget allocation on the most important points

All tasks are important to us. In the offer you should include a description of how you see the tasks in the tender resolved in the best way. If you do not believe that you can deliver certain tasks within the budget you should leave them out, with an explanation as to why you have left them out. We will choose the offer that fits our award criteria best. The offer that you have submitted will then work as a supplement to the contract.

Åbn udbudsdetaljer (gældende version 18-06-2019) Luk udbudsdetaljer (gældende version 18-06-2019)
Titel Reduction of food loss and food waste: Support for the development of a voluntary agreement on reduction of food waste and food loss, and delivery of a catalogue of initiatives to reduce food waste and food loss along the supply chain
Dokumenttype Varer og tjenesteydelser med klar grænseoverskridende interesse
Opgavebeskrivelse This procurement procedure comprises of 2 separate tasks:

1) Support for the Danish Think Tank on Prevention of Food Loss and Food Waste in the development of a voluntary agreement between businesses in the supply chain, and

2) the delivery of a catalogue describing initiatives to reduce food waste and food loss along the whole supply chain, building the ‘business case’ for a voluntary agreement and providing recommendations and suggestions for impactful activities.

The actual detailed description and the requirements of the tendered project appear from the specification of requirements, Appendix 2.

18/06/2019
We have received the following questions, which have been answered below:

Regarding the first separate task: Support in developing the voluntary agreement, should the work being done here be regarded purely as advisory support for the think tank who then produces process descriptions itself, or does the work also entail the production of specific process descriptions?

The work includes the production of the specific process description in writing.

What is meant by “in-depth description of the decision procedures” as a part of the delivery in the first specific task?

The voluntary agreement is an agreement between multiple companies and the organisers. We need a step by step description of the decision procedures, including input for the articles of association, and who has the mandate to decide what, but also a description of questions that could occur, and that could be a matter of “greyzone”.

In what format should the offer include presentations of team members?
The presentation of team members should include CVs and a description of relevant experience within the field of voluntary agreements.

Should we be ready to start the project in July?

We expect the work to start up in end of August.

The tender indicates an equal split of the budget for the two tasks, is this fixed? Our view is that the second deliverable is less complex.

Both tasks are equal as important to us, but we are open to discuss how much time that will be delegated to each task.

Do you have any specific priorities on the list of tasks? This could help us to focus the budget allocation on the most important points

All tasks are important to us. In the offer you should include a description of how you see the tasks in the tender resolved in the best way. If you do not believe that you can deliver certain tasks within the budget you should leave them out, with an explanation as to why you have left them out. We will choose the offer that fits our award criteria best. The offer that you have submitted will then work as a supplement to the contract.
Deadline 28-06-2019 kl. 23.55
Udbudstype Udbud under tærskelværdierne
Opgavetype Tjenesteydelser
Tildelingskriterier Bedste forhold mellem pris og kvalitet
Uddybning af tildelingskriterier The evaluation of the financially most advantageous tender will be based on the criteria below with the weighting stated:

1. Project solution 30 %
Description of procedure, quality assurance, methodology and schedule for implementation of the specific project.


2. Staff-related qualifications 70 %
Professional competencies and relevant experience of the supplier with similar projects
Dokumenter
Ordregiver S/I Tænketank om Forebyggelse af Madspild og Fød // CVR:40398953
Skønnet kontraktsum 180000 DKK
Udvælgelseskriterier The supplier is selected on the basis of the award criterion: Best price quality (the financially most advantageous tender)
Adresse Slotsholmen 12
1216
København k
WWW: www.mfvm.dk
CPV kode 90713000-8 - Rådgivning i forbindelse med miljøspørgsmål
Udbudsform Offentligt/åbent udbud
SMV venligt Ja
Kontaktperson Emilie Müller
Kontakt E-mail: emimm@mfvm.dk
Telefon: +45 93597075
Åbn kommentarer til ændringer eller aflysning Luk kommentarer til ændringer eller aflysning


[18-06-2019 14:50:05]
18/06/2019
We have received the following questions, which have been answered below:

Regarding the first separate task: Support in developing the voluntary agreement, should the work being done here be regarded purely as advisory support for the think tank who then produces process descriptions itself, or does the work also entail the production of specific process descriptions?

The work includes the production of the specific process description in writing.

What is meant by “in-depth description of the decision procedures” as a part of the delivery in the first specific task?

The voluntary agreement is an agreement between multiple companies and the organisers. We need a step by step description of the decision procedures, including input for the articles of association, and who has the mandate to decide what, but also a description of questions that could occur, and that could be a matter of “greyzone”.

In what format should the offer include presentations of team members?
The presentation of team members should include CVs and a description of relevant experience within the field of voluntary agreements.

Should we be ready to start the project in July?

We expect the work to start up in end of August.

The tender indicates an equal split of the budget for the two tasks, is this fixed? Our view is that the second deliverable is less complex.

Both tasks are equal as important to us, but we are open to discuss how much time that will be delegated to each task.

Do you have any specific priorities on the list of tasks? This could help us to focus the budget allocation on the most important points

All tasks are important to us. In the offer you should include a description of how you see the tasks in the tender resolved in the best way. If you do not believe that you can deliver certain tasks within the budget you should leave them out, with an explanation as to why you have left them out. We will choose the offer that fits our award criteria best. The offer that you have submitted will then work as a supplement to the contract.

Åbn tidligere version 27-05-2019 Luk tidligere version 27-05-2019
Titel Reduction of food loss and food waste: Support for the development of a voluntary agreement on reduction of food waste and food loss, and delivery of a catalogue of initiatives to reduce food waste and food loss along the supply chain
Dokumenttype Varer og tjenesteydelser med klar grænseoverskridende interesse
Opgavebeskrivelse This procurement procedure comprises of 2 separate tasks:

1) Support for the Danish Think Tank on Prevention of Food Loss and Food Waste in the development of a voluntary agreement between businesses in the supply chain, and

2) the delivery of a catalogue describing initiatives to reduce food waste and food loss along the whole supply chain, building the ‘business case’ for a voluntary agreement and providing recommendations and suggestions for impactful activities.

The actual detailed description and the requirements of the tendered project appear from the specification of requirements, Appendix 2.
Deadline 28-06-2019 kl. 23.55
Udbudstype Udbud under tærskelværdierne
Opgavetype Tjenesteydelser
Tildelingskriterier Bedste forhold mellem pris og kvalitet
Uddybning af tildelingskriterier The evaluation of the financially most advantageous tender will be based on the criteria below with the weighting stated:

1. Project solution 30 %
Description of procedure, quality assurance, methodology and schedule for implementation of the specific project.


2. Staff-related qualifications 70 %
Professional competencies and relevant experience of the supplier with similar projects
Dokumenter
Ordregiver S/I Tænketank om Forebyggelse af Madspild og Fød // CVR:40398953
Skønnet kontraktsum 180000 DKK
Udvælgelseskriterier The supplier is selected on the basis of the award criterion: Best price quality (the financially most advantageous tender)
Adresse Slotsholmen 12
1216
København k
WWW: www.mfvm.dk
CPV kode 90713000-8 - Rådgivning i forbindelse med miljøspørgsmål
Udbudsform Offentligt/åbent udbud
SMV venligt Ja
Kontaktperson Emilie Müller
Kontakt E-mail: emimm@mfvm.dk
Telefon: +45 93597075